Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 03:40 PM Jul 2013

Gun "Accidentally" Kills 16 Year Old In Louisiana

A 23-year-old Louisiana man accidentally fired an assault rifle while showing it off to a group of friends, killing a 16-year-old, police said.

Christian Cardon, of Gretna, was booked Sunday on a count of negligent homicide, according to the Times-Picayune. His friend, Trey Stahl, was found by first responders lying on the kitchen floor with a bullet wound to his neck. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

Cardon was allegedly showing off his AR-15 assault rifle in the kitchen. He told police that he pulled the trigger to clear the gun, and it discharged. He said he left the rifle's magazine in his vehicle before he brought the weapon inside, and that he didn't realize the gun had a live round in the chamber.

He faces a maximum sentence of five years in jail.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/christian-cardon-trey-stahl_n_3529644.html


Wow!! Maximum of 5 whole years. Seems fair for taking the life of a teenager.

I'm sure he'll be much more careful after he gets out and starts using weapons again. <sarcasm>

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun "Accidentally" Kills 16 Year Old In Louisiana (Original Post) SoCalMusicLover Jul 2013 OP
What crime other than Negligent Homicide would you charge him with? hack89 Jul 2013 #1
Seems like the right charge, but I consider the penalty inadequate. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2013 #5
I'm not at all convinced that "rigorous training" is the cure here. You can be rigorously trained an CTyankee Jul 2013 #55
I'm not suggesting it's a crime prevention measure. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2013 #57
I want to thank you for your clearheaded assessment of reasonable gun safety laws such as CTyankee Jul 2013 #65
Five Years For Taking A Life? SoCalMusicLover Jul 2013 #15
The law is the law. 5 years is not an uncommon sentence for negligent homicide. hack89 Jul 2013 #20
He'll Find A Way SoCalMusicLover Jul 2013 #22
Good. our laws are working. nt galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #2
training is important Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #3
I would support legislations that forced a person ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #4
I like that. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2013 #6
Fuckin' A Right. Iggo Jul 2013 #31
That's and excellent idea. MH1 Jul 2013 #61
I would add, Jenoch Jul 2013 #16
Unfortunately, people don't follow basic rules. Even folks who "teach" those basic rules screw up. Hoyt Jul 2013 #51
But, but . . . guns are just inanimate objects BainsBane Jul 2013 #7
Well, the gun was unharmed. Robb Jul 2013 #8
the gun was not unharmed...it was victimized by a 23yo dumbass. ileus Jul 2013 #12
The Gun Will Go On To Lead A Productive Life SoCalMusicLover Jul 2013 #13
Post of the year alcibiades_mystery Jul 2013 #39
"he pulled the trigger to clear the gun" NickB79 Jul 2013 #9
and why the hell have it pointed at someone? MH1 Jul 2013 #63
Looking at that headline, it seems that guns actually DO kill people. Arkansas Granny Jul 2013 #10
Wut??? you clear the chamber by pulling the trigger... ileus Jul 2013 #11
nice bullshit headline ProdigalJunkMail Jul 2013 #14
like this car drove into walmart Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #18
If we took a poll Jenoch Jul 2013 #17
Not a responsible gun owner Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #19
Unfortunately, right now, everyone is a responsible gun owner... Marrah_G Jul 2013 #66
But He WAS A Responsible Gun Owner SoCalMusicLover Jul 2013 #21
You are mistaken. Jenoch Jul 2013 #23
no he was not Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #24
you can be irresponsible with lots of things and kill people ProdigalJunkMail Jul 2013 #26
Guns don't kill people idiots with guns kill people upaloopa Jul 2013 #29
but that isn't how it's portrayed by many here ProdigalJunkMail Jul 2013 #32
Yes there is little logic in most of tbese threads. upaloopa Jul 2013 #35
I disagree. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2013 #30
Not everyone. Just people who want guns. upaloopa Jul 2013 #33
I think everyone should Jenoch Jul 2013 #43
I am speaking for people like my wife. She hates guns upaloopa Jul 2013 #45
I was thinking of people Jenoch Jul 2013 #46
I disagree. Guns represent violence and killing to some upaloopa Jul 2013 #49
"...parents have the duty to raise their kids as they see fit." Jenoch Jul 2013 #50
another death caused by the NRA sigmasix Jul 2013 #25
Why would close friends and family, Jenoch Jul 2013 #34
I have friends and family that are teabagger gun nuts sigmasix Jul 2013 #47
Wow, that's a lot of NRA. Jenoch Jul 2013 #48
you're lucky sigmasix Jul 2013 #53
How do you know they are Jenoch Jul 2013 #54
the ballcaps, tshirts and membership decals on their trucks sigmasix Jul 2013 #58
Are you having similar problems Jenoch Jul 2013 #60
we live in the city here now sigmasix Jul 2013 #67
define murder... ProdigalJunkMail Jul 2013 #41
Here's the correct headline from the article you linked. CokeMachine Jul 2013 #27
Thanks Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #37
take a guess... n/t ProdigalJunkMail Jul 2013 #40
Here's the time stamp. CokeMachine Jul 2013 #44
So was this guy trained to use this weapon upaloopa Jul 2013 #28
It is evident that he was not trained to handle that weapon. Jenoch Jul 2013 #36
or any weapon nt Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #38
I have read about Jenoch Jul 2013 #42
Gun Handling 101: Big-time fail. (nt) Paladin Jul 2013 #56
In a just world, he would be banned from owning or even touching guns FOR LIFE. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #52
You never see a headline "Gun hits target" or "Gun shoots deer". bluedigger Jul 2013 #59
enter the first rule of firearm safety onethatcares Jul 2013 #62
The guy that pulled the trigger made a horrible mistake and will pay for it. rrneck Jul 2013 #64
Another responsible gun owner, until he was not. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #68

hack89

(39,171 posts)
1. What crime other than Negligent Homicide would you charge him with?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jul 2013

Five years is a typical max sentence for Negligent Homicide.

Here is the Louisiana law:

2006 Louisiana Laws - RS 14:32 — Negligent homicide

§32. Negligent homicide

A. Negligent homicide is the killing of a human being by criminal negligence.

B. The violation of a statute or ordinance shall be considered only as presumptive evidence of such negligence.

C. Whoever commits the crime of negligent homicide shall be imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than five years, fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both. However, if the victim was killed as a result of receiving a battery and was under the age of ten years, the offender shall be imprisoned at hard labor, without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, for not less than two nor more than five years.

Amended by Acts 1980, No. 708, §1; Acts 1991, No. 864, §1.


http://law.justia.com/codes/louisiana/2006/146/78409.html
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
5. Seems like the right charge, but I consider the penalty inadequate.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 03:57 PM
Jul 2013

This incident also points up the need for rigorous training before exercising one's right to possess deadly weapons. Not checking the chamber? I simply cannot imagine ever doing that.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
55. I'm not at all convinced that "rigorous training" is the cure here. You can be rigorously trained an
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 09:42 AM
Jul 2013

at the same time be a seriously unhinged zealot or a determined criminally inclined individual. Such people are not likely to be fazed by rigorous training in gun use. In fact, I think the opposite is true.

I'm sure you can't imagine ever doing what he did. But that is a problem right there. The fact is that there are incredibly irresponsible, ignorant and lazy people who can nonetheless get guns. It's out there every day as long as we fail as a nation to pass reasonable gun safety laws.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
57. I'm not suggesting it's a crime prevention measure.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 09:58 AM
Jul 2013

This thread's not about criminal use of firearms, it's about an accident that happened when an idiot violated multiple absolutely basic principles of gun safety. Rigorous training helps prevent this sort of tragedy by making those principles completely automatic. That's why I say I can't imagine doing that: it's automatic for me to check the chamber of any purportedly "unloaded" gun, to keep my finger away from the trigger unless the weapon's pointed on-target, and to never point it at anything I don't want to destroy. It's fully ingrained behavior.

I do agree wholeheartedly that the ease with which irresponsible, completely untrained persons can obtain firearms is a big problem. I support mandatory training requirements. I understand the argument against requiring government permission to exercise a constitutional right, but I think it's a useful compromise. Firearms accidents aren't remotely the problem criminal misuse of guns is, or course. But required training seems like a way to reduce those comparatively small numbers even further.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
65. I want to thank you for your clearheaded assessment of reasonable gun safety laws such as
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jul 2013

mandatory training requirements.

As for the crime issues, a very good argument can be made that there are other remedies, unrelated to just gun issues per se, that can reduce crime. My city has had some success with "community policing," for instance. I would have to check the stats over a long period of time but there is the sense that this has been a good thing and a positive step. The problems that remain of course are our drug laws and inner city poverty. The point I am trying to make is that these problems won't go away with one solution and only one level of society. Each level can do a lot, if only they would. Right now we are choosing our Democratic candidate for mayor in an upcoming primary, which is like electing one since we are overwhelmingly a Democratic city. We are now shedding our "mayor for life" John DeStefano (of infamous Ricci SCOTUS case fame) for, I sincerely hope, a black woman who is currently my state senator. This is an absolutely critical election for our city, IMO.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
15. Five Years For Taking A Life?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jul 2013

Here's another thread from DU about someone facing 13 years for using chalk on a sidewalk.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023142360

We truly have a wonderful system here. I'm sure he'll be able to buy an even better assault weapon in a couple of years when he gets out. Although somehow I don't imagine he'll even spend that long in jail. After all, it was just an "accident."

Tell that to the family. I'm sure they'll find comfort in that.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
20. The law is the law. 5 years is not an uncommon sentence for negligent homicide.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:24 PM
Jul 2013

why are you mad at me? I am merely pointing out why he can only go to prison for 5 years.

And no - he will not be able to legally buy a gun again because he has been convicted of a felony.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
22. He'll Find A Way
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:10 PM
Jul 2013

There are so many holes in the gun buying system, I'm sure he won't have a problem finding a gun, even with a felony conviction.

That's even assuming he's convicted of a felony. By the time this is all over, and he cries about how it was an innocent accident, he might get let off with a citation.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
3. training is important
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 03:52 PM
Jul 2013

failed to clear his weapon and if followed basic rules, this sad episode would not happen. He will have to live with this for the rest of his life. He should get jail time for his negligence, not sure for how long.

BASIC RULES, everyone should be taught.

RULE I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED

RULE II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY

RULE III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET

RULE IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET

http://thefiringline.com/Misc/safetyrules.html

children should also be taught not to touch guns and to get an adult if they see one.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
16. I would add,
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:15 PM
Jul 2013

never attempt to 'clear' a gun by pulling the trigger.

I was once deer hunting at a cousin's place and one of the other guys there decided to check to see if his gun was on safe by pulling the trigger. It was not on safe and it was loaded. Fortunately, he had the muzzle pointing in the air. I let him have it with a louder than it should have been scolding. (I did not know the guy.) i hunted that day, but never returned.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
51. Unfortunately, people don't follow basic rules. Even folks who "teach" those basic rules screw up.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:31 AM
Jul 2013

We pay the price for folks prurient interest in guns.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
8. Well, the gun was unharmed.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:01 PM
Jul 2013

Let us now consult the Book of Gundamentslist Platitudes, chapter 3, verse 6-9:

And yea, though the child lay slain,
We shall come together in chastising the killer for their lack of gun safety skills,
And pick upon the nits of gun type and character;
The holy Gun no more than a plow, or hammer, or pools of Swimming.
Except only thy greatest Fools buy more swimming pools when their neighbors' child is drown'd.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
9. "he pulled the trigger to clear the gun"
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:02 PM
Jul 2013

Yeah, that would do it, if you're too stupid to pull back the charging handle. Dumb-ass.

MH1

(17,600 posts)
63. and why the hell have it pointed at someone?
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:46 PM
Jul 2013

yeah, the "what a dumb-ass" lines could go on for awhile.

and the kid is still dead.

Arkansas Granny

(31,518 posts)
10. Looking at that headline, it seems that guns actually DO kill people.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:03 PM
Jul 2013

Another responsible gun owner, I'm sure. A tragic accident that was totally avoidable.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
11. Wut??? you clear the chamber by pulling the trigger...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:07 PM
Jul 2013

Title should be 23yo "accidently" kills 16yo


I always pull the charging handle back on my AR's to check the chamber. As a bystander I also make sure never to stand in front of any firearms business end.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
14. nice bullshit headline
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jul 2013

the GUN didn't accidentally do anything... the idiot waving the weapon around then pulling the trigger killed someone.

sP

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
18. like this car drove into walmart
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jul 2013

At least these guys know how to write a headline

Man drives car into San Jose WalMart, attacks customers

http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/several-people-injured-after-car-crashes-san-jose-/nW8Fb/

OP story should have read "man shoots and kills teenager with rifle"

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
17. If we took a poll
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:19 PM
Jul 2013

I would bet that not a single Person would say the 23 year old was a responsible gun owner. This tragedy is another exanple why everyone should go through gun safety training.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
19. Not a responsible gun owner
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:23 PM
Jul 2013

that is correct, like I said training is important. 20+ years of "keep your weapon up and downrange".

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
66. Unfortunately, right now, everyone is a responsible gun owner...
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 08:21 AM
Jul 2013

...until they aren't.

We have more training and regulation for cars and motorcycles then we do for guns.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
21. But He WAS A Responsible Gun Owner
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:37 PM
Jul 2013

Because, everyone is a responsible gun owner, until they do something irresponsible.

We gotta have our guns though. So it's inevitable that we're going to have innocent, "accidental" deaths from time to time.

The nice thing about guns is that when you're "irresponsible," the worst thing that can happen is someone loses their life forever. Gun lovers can live with that, so long as nobody takes away their guns.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
23. You are mistaken.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:21 PM
Jul 2013
There are many irresponsible gun owners. This 23 year old is one example. A felon with a gun, a gun owner with underage children in the house and unlocked guns, a person who uses illegal drugs, these are all irresponsible gunowners.

You seem like you would be in favor of banning all private ownership of guns. How do you propose something like that could be accomplished?
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
24. no he was not
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:32 PM
Jul 2013

99% are and you never here about them but the 1% idiots are yes not responsible gun owners.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
26. you can be irresponsible with lots of things and kill people
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jul 2013

but guns are really the only inanimate object that gets blamed for the deaths... makes loads of sense.

sP

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
32. but that isn't how it's portrayed by many here
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:46 PM
Jul 2013

is it? the disconnect in logic when political 'mission' gets in the way is astounding.

sP

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
30. I disagree.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jul 2013

"everyone is a responsible gun owner, until they do something irresponsible"

I disagree. If you don't get proper training, commit that training to memory, then act according to that training from the start, you never were a responsible gun owner.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
33. Not everyone. Just people who want guns.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:47 PM
Jul 2013

Some people want nothing to do with guns and that is their right.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
43. I think everyone should
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jul 2013

have a general knowledge of firearms. Of course it is their right to remain ignorant about guns. If the 16 year old in this case had gun safety training he might have asked if the gun was unloaded and then asked that it be proven to him by pulling back the bolt. That is what I do.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
45. I am speaking for people like my wife. She hates guns
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 06:18 PM
Jul 2013

even though I have a .22 pistol. I keep the cylinder out of the frame and a gun lock on the frame. That is our compromise.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
46. I was thinking of people
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:21 PM
Jul 2013

younger than your wife should get firearms training. Teenagers should be taught about guns. It could save ther life and I can't think of a good reason not to have the training.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
49. I disagree. Guns represent violence and killing to some
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jul 2013

people and they want nothing to do with guns. Kids can make that decision when they are able to purchase a gun. Until then parents have the duty to raise their kids as they see fit.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
50. "...parents have the duty to raise their kids as they see fit."
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:07 AM
Jul 2013

Of course they do. I have never written anything about mandatory gun safety training. Such training could one day save the lives of those that go through such training.

sigmasix

(794 posts)
25. another death caused by the NRA
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:36 PM
Jul 2013

the NRA and it's followers have spent millions of dollars and thousands of man-hours to make the notion of responsible gun ownership a running joke. Through legislation designed to weaken gun responsibility enforcement, defund legal authorities that deal with illegal gun sales and expand gun rights to violent felons the NRA shares a great deal of responsibility for this 16 year-old's murder. But, like all extremist reactionary organizations, will not accept responsibility for their actions.
The NRA has created a legislative and moral atmosphere that is directly responsible for the tragic existence of irresponsible individuals given the right to own guns.

My wife and I have made a rule: no one is allowed to bring any gun onto our property- even close friends and family are not allowed to come armed on our property. We will not discuss our policy or waste time bebating with gundamentalists- we will just call the police and report the illegal presence of a gun on our property and let the grinning gun nut explain to LEOs the need for bringing a gun onto property that is well marked as private property with a "NO GUNS ALLOWED" policy. With any luck said gun nut will lose his/her gun rights over intentionally breaking the law with a gun.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
34. Why would close friends and family,
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:48 PM
Jul 2013

or anyone for that matter, bring guns onto your property? Is your property in the country where hunting occurs?

sigmasix

(794 posts)
47. I have friends and family that are teabagger gun nuts
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 04:42 AM
Jul 2013

and when they are on our property only my wife and I are allowed to have a gun. Florida law makes "accidental" gun discharges that lead to the death of someone else a joke. If a gun nut kills or harms one of my family members while ("cleaning&quot playing with his/her gun, said gun nut better get to the cops before I find him/her and "clean" my .357 at them.
We used to live in the woods of michigan- drunken NRA nuts out hunting on our property was a serious problem; the local NRA chapter really enjoyed mixing beer and firearms while trespassing on several private estates without permission. One day a few years ago I caught 5 proud, drunken NRA members trespassing on my land with loaded long rifles and AR 15 look-alikes- shooting at geese and duck well out of season. When I informed them that they were tresspassing they brandished their weapons and told me that I would be stupid to contact LEOs because they (the NRA sticker collectors) "know where my family sleeps"
I've never met an honorable NRA supporter, lot's of bigot filled conspiracy theory mongers, but no one with honor.
I suppose it would be impossible to be honorable while creating a moral and political atmosphere that leads to violent death at the hands of irresponsible gun owners.
My gun-nut friends know they have no chance of convincing me to beleive in the NRA's paranoia-manipulating lies and AntiAmerican aims.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
48. Wow, that's a lot of NRA.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:40 AM
Jul 2013

We have a couple hundred acres of hunting and farmland in Minnesota and have had no experiences similar to what you describe.

sigmasix

(794 posts)
53. you're lucky
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 04:49 AM
Jul 2013

NRA enthusiasts were so irresponsible in our neck of the woods that we had to make sure our children stayed indoors during hunting season- many close calls with trespassing NRA drunks firng their weapons in the air and in other deeply irresponsible and dangerous ways. On more than one occasion I caught NRA members tersspassers on my land shooting at whatever moves- our children used to like playing in the woods on our property, but all too often we had to keep them indoors because of the real danger the local NRA members represented to the life of our children. They never cleaned up their shell casings after tresspassing and shooting up our woods and one time I ran over an unspent bullet with my lawnmower- the bullet went off and punctured a whole in the deck of the riding mower, missing me by inches.
This has been my family's experience with NRA members and gun nut folks- I'm sure there are many stories like this, but the Right wing media has successfully scrubbed any story that refutes right wing gun nuttery and misanthropic hatred for "the other". NRA members are not given the right to be heroic protectors of all white women- why do these bigoted misogynists need to make beleive they are heros? Because their narrative is violently destructive to the rule of law and everyone knows that the NRA is working hard to destroy american cohesion and the bill of rights. The criminal activities of NRA members are ignored or trivialized by local good ole boy LEOs that are members and supporters of the aims of the NRA and the individual local NRA members that routinely use their guns for illegal activities like tresspassing, poaching and dangerous firearm discharging while drinking. Jethro, the local deputy is not going to arrest billyjoe, his fellow NRA member and shooting range pal.
Fuck the NRA and all their goons that tresspass on other's land and threaten the life of non-NRA members that want guns restricted to responsible adults.

Remember: NRA= "no responsible adults"

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
54. How do you know they are
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 09:33 AM
Jul 2013

all NRA nembers?

We generally have a more respecful shooting/huntint crowd in our area (northern Minnesota.) We have had our land for about 15 years and I can only recall a couple times we had tresspassers. Both times occured while we were not there and no guns were involved as far as we know. Our land is posted but not too well.

Have a safe Independence Day.

sigmasix

(794 posts)
58. the ballcaps, tshirts and membership decals on their trucks
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:12 PM
Jul 2013

From our experience, NRA members love to announce to everyone else how proud they are to be a member. The trucks of the tresspassers were always adorned with NRA membership stickers and they often wore caps and jackets with "NRA" printed across the front or back. We contacted the local LEOs several times concerning the tresspassing, but every time we did it, the trespassers got a call from someone associated with the county cops warning them to leave before the police arrived. We took photos and video of the tresspassers and were told by the county sherriff that there was nothing the police could do because the tresspassers have legal rights, when hunting, which couldn't be taken from them. Those rights include the ability to follow a hunted animal onto my property or through it. I asked what would happen If I met the NRA tresspassers with my own guns, in an attempt to protect my family from them and was told that if I did that the police would charge me with a crime. This was the woods of Michigan and the property was owned and well marked as a no hunting or tresspassing plot. NRA tresspassers would just tear my signs down or shoot them up with their man-sized courage machines. I've met many residents of the woods of Michigan with the same sort of story; It's like the local NRA has discovered a list of names of residents that are anti-NRA and decided to harrass and intimidate those that disagree with them by tresspassing and brandishing weapons to terrorize defensless American homeowners.
Big boys that treat guns like toys shouldn't have the right to own a gun- especially when they use their gun to terrorize their fellow Americans and destroy other's private property.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
60. Are you having similar problems
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

in Florida?

I guess we're lucky. Our property is recreational. We have a cattleman that has planted about 90 acres of clover that he cuts and bales three times a year. Another neighbor checks our gate everytime he drives by.

sigmasix

(794 posts)
67. we live in the city here now
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 06:03 PM
Jul 2013

I haven't experienced any of those problems here in florida. Of course we dont have 16 acres of wooded land with a pond on here so unless they wanna shoot the pool in the back yard they're gonna look pretty obvious with their shot guns and AR15s when they pull up in the driveway. We have a policy that expessly forbids anyone from bringing a gun onto our property here in florida. This is due to the ridiculousness of florida gun laws written by the NRA. In florida a gun owner can kill anyone and get away with it if they claim they were just cleaning the gun and accidently shot the victim. The most the murderer with a clean gun can expect for punishment is 5 years. Florida's NRA-written gun laws offer the perfect opportunity to commit murder and receive no real punishment.
My wife and children's lives are too important to trust to NRA supporters with cleaning kits and dirty guns.

 

CokeMachine

(1,018 posts)
27. Here's the correct headline from the article you linked.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:41 PM
Jul 2013
"Christian Cardon Accidentally Fired Assault Rifle, Killing 16-Year-Old Trey Stahl In Louisiana: Police"
Just an FYI ...
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
37. Thanks
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:50 PM
Jul 2013

Did it change or did the OP try and shape the story here? If this is the case the OP should be ashamed and should correct the headline.

 

CokeMachine

(1,018 posts)
44. Here's the time stamp.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jul 2013

The Huffington Post | By Andy Campbell Posted: 07/01/2013 1:20 pm EDT | Updated: 07/01/2013 1:20 pm EDT

The OP was posted at 12:40 PST which would be 3:40 EDT.

Looks like the OP just made up the headline to fit their narrative. Wasn't (isn't) there a rule on DU that the original headline must be used?? Maybe that's just LBN.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
42. I have read about
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jul 2013

situations like this where, usually, a young person, is handlng a semi-auto and thinks the gun is unloaded if the magazine is removed. They know little about the gun. Again, that's why I think EVERYONE should go through gun safety training.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
59. You never see a headline "Gun hits target" or "Gun shoots deer".
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

More evidence that guns are inherently evil when left to their own devices.

onethatcares

(16,169 posts)
62. enter the first rule of firearm safety
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jul 2013

along with the second and third.

Damn stupidity will get us all killed, if we're not careful.

btw, pulling the trigger will actually clear the gun,

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
64. The guy that pulled the trigger made a horrible mistake and will pay for it.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jul 2013

I have to wonder what the guy who got shot was thinking. He didn't do (or not do as the case may be) anything for which he deserved to die, but damn if somebody points a gun at me I'm not going to just stand there and wait to see what happens when he pulls the trigger. Why didn't anybody in that group think to say, "Whoa dude, fuckin' watchit with that thing!"

Tragedies like this don't happen for just one reason, but as the result of a combination of failures. One guy made a mistake that will cost him five years of his life. Another made a smaller one that cost him the rest of his life. How many others made the same small mistake and it won't cost them anything.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gun "Accidentally" Kills ...