General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy couldn't both Zimmerman AND Martin have been on top in the fight?
I have been in a few tussles and positions can change in a second. This point in the trial seems to have such importance, so I can't understand why no one brings this up.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)because you notice they have a gun in a holster on their side, you might still scream for help and be reluctant to retreat. Don't you think?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)ground techniques, slips an arm free, gets his gun and shoots you... you are dead.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Who has been beat up is silent?
Well you can try selling that one to a jury.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)but I also believe TM was mostly trying to hold him down because he saw he was armed.
GZ *only* began screaming for help AFTER witness John Good came outside and asked them what was happening.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)And I think the 6 women jurors are smart enough to make the right decision.
First, if that account is accurate then it totally impeaches Zimmerman (again) because he claimed that he was crying for help and nobody came. John Good testified on Friday that he stepped outside, yelled loudly to them "What's going on!" and to "Cut it out!" and then (and only then) did he start to hear calls for help. THEN he told them he was calling 911. So, Zimmerman lied that nobody came to help, he KNEW without any doubt that police were on their way (both from his own prior phone call and now this witness who says he's calling) and he STILL shoots an unarmed kid.
I firmly believe the jurors are smart enough to understand this.
John2
(2,730 posts)to this FBI expert testimony, and I find it striking the prosecution didn't ask certain questions to him.
Given, that a person can not testify against themselves, I find it striking the prosecution didn't ask this expert if they asked George Zimmerman to reproduce the same scream he gave that night in different conditions and compare it to that scream. Why wouldn't that be incrimination or exculpatory evidence? Why the prosecution wouldn't use that line of inquiry? You can't ask Trayvon to reproduce it but Zimmerman is still alive. That line of questioning was never asked by the prosecution. And I agree, the prosecution does not impress me right now. I was even displease with their conduct with Jenteal and Good. They seem very passive in proving their case to me.
When i was about sixteen I got in a fight with this miscreant who is now in prison.
I was on top and foolishly got off because I didn't have the heart to mount and pound someone.
I then lost the "privileged" position and ended up with a black eye and a swollen jaw.
dkf
(37,305 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)A friend of mine eventually pulled him off.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Doesn't that argument actually bolster Zimmerman's case that he was in danger of further and greater bodily harm?
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)or if this is just a 'show trial' ....
firenewt
(298 posts)When Zimmerman is declared 'not guilty' the shit will really hit the fan.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Watching this trial, they have so little compared to what you'd normally see at a murder trial.