Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
War? What is it good for? (Original Post) kentuck Jun 2013 OP
"War" by Edwin Starr (Original Video - 1969) Purveyor Jun 2013 #1
OK, everybody! You know the answer! Brigid Jun 2013 #2
Did you know that was the original title of Tolstoy's "War and Peace"? tularetom Jun 2013 #3
One of the most decorated Marines of all times spoke out loud against the multinational corruption think Jun 2013 #4
The Third Reich would have won had the allied powers not intervened. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #5
yup sometimes the alternative can be worse. loli phabay Jun 2013 #6
I have a hard time... Bigmack Jun 2013 #11
Contemplate Nazi Germany with atomic weapons Lurks Often Jun 2013 #13
Are you at all familiar with WWII weapons...? Bigmack Jul 2013 #21
And where do you think the Germans would have been in 5 years? Lurks Often Jul 2013 #22
And where do you think Russia would have been in 5 years...? Bigmack Jul 2013 #25
Also, when speaking of war, in general... kentuck Jul 2013 #26
Most of the thread has been "would have been" history Lurks Often Jul 2013 #31
"Hard to think of that as better than any alternative." - How about the total eradication of Jews? Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #15
I don't take you for stupid... Bigmack Jul 2013 #17
No, I talk like someone who understands what could have happened had the axis won. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #19
I can do math, too. 4 million is less than 85 million. nt Bigmack Jul 2013 #20
Bravo! A history teacher who can do math? Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #29
Another great quote from Butler on corporate war mongering: think Jun 2013 #7
And when you ask them, "How much should we give?" Ooh, they only answer "More! More! More!" yoh pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #8
Thanks for the CCR kentuck Jun 2013 #9
You and me both, bro pinboy3niner Jul 2013 #18
. In_The_Wind Jun 2013 #14
K&R!!-NT Anansi1171 Jun 2013 #10
To quote Country Joe McDonald Doc_Technical Jun 2013 #12
War is only good for those who MAKE WAR... The less than 1% Suffer KoKo Jun 2013 #16
1%, Military Contractors, Wall Street, Military Industrial Complex, Military (Generals in Particular KoKo Jul 2013 #23
That was the working title for Tolstoy's "War and Peace" egduj Jul 2013 #24
War! What is it good for? Profit! Sing it again y'all!!! Initech Jul 2013 #27
All wars are hell on earth. But some are necessary. Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #28
I've sort of been interested in studying why ancient civilizations went to war Cleita Jul 2013 #30

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
2. OK, everybody! You know the answer!
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jun 2013

Nice and loud so I can hear you!

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!

For Smedley Butler.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
4. One of the most decorated Marines of all times spoke out loud against the multinational corruption
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jun 2013

K&R

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
5. The Third Reich would have won had the allied powers not intervened.
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:39 PM
Jun 2013

Nothing is so black and white. War is a despicable thing. Most of the time it is not needed nor wanted. But there are always exceptions.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
11. I have a hard time...
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:07 PM
Jun 2013

.. being that dispassionate about it.

The Allies certainly never went to war to save the Jews. Power struggle in Europe.. nothing more. Been going on for centuries. Trade wars, wars of religion, ethnic wars, nationalist wars....

Hitler won in Western Europe. He couldn't invade England or the US. Napoleon could have told him about invading Russia. How long would the 3rd Reich have held together? Empires rise and fall... look at our own.

85 million dead people in WWII, and that doesn't count the wounded and maimed, or the psychologically scarred, or the misery.

Hard to think of that as better than any alternative.





 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
13. Contemplate Nazi Germany with atomic weapons
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jun 2013

and very long range bombers and/or missiles. How long do you think it would have been before New York, Boston or Washington DC disappeared in a mushroom cloud?

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
21. Are you at all familiar with WWII weapons...?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:39 PM
Jul 2013

Reliable long range missiles and bombers that could travel those distances weren't developed until at least 20 years later. Even early ICBMs had a range of around 3500 miles. That's short of the 5000 miles to the US. You honestly think that Germany could have sent bombers across the Atlantic or over the pole in numbers enough to get thru US defenses?

Please... don't use the mushroom cloud thing. First of all, the US is the only country to deploy those mushroom clouds. Second, do you remember the last time we were told we might get nuked...? Bush told us about a smoking gun with a mushroom cloud.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
22. And where do you think the Germans would have been in 5 years?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jul 2013

5 years of no pressure from England & the US and it is likely they would have come up with long range missiles and/or planes and if you don't think Hitler would have used atomic weapons you are either very naive or very ignorant.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
25. And where do you think Russia would have been in 5 years...?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jul 2013

Berlin.

As long as you are playing "would have been" history.

kentuck

(111,102 posts)
26. Also, when speaking of war, in general...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:39 PM
Jul 2013

we are not just talking about America's involvement or not, but the involvement of the entire world.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
31. Most of the thread has been "would have been" history
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:05 AM
Jul 2013

and without England & the United States, Germany probably would have overrun Russia since it would have freed up divisions along with all the aviation assets that would not have been needed in Africa, Greece and the Balkans and probably some from France as well.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
15. "Hard to think of that as better than any alternative." - How about the total eradication of Jews?
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:14 PM
Jun 2013

Gypsies? Homosexuals? Dissidents? Socialists? Communists? Academics?

The total emancipation of the final solution from any restriction. The total establishment of the aryan as the prime human being. The cleansing of the African continent?

Do not take me for stupid. I know plenty about the horrors of the Third Reich just as I know the atrocities committed by the allied forces.

I also understand the motivation behind the entrance of the allied forces into the war. That does not change my position one bit. To make any attempt to equate the morality of the Nazis with the allied forces is absolutely absurd. It means you likely know little about what actually happened.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
17. I don't take you for stupid...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 01:26 AM
Jul 2013

... I take you for arrogant.

And undereducated.

I taught history for 30 years... MA in Modern History.

4 years in the Marine Corps... Vietnam.

You talk like World War II was fought to protect Jews and Communists.

No.

85 million dead.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
19. No, I talk like someone who understands what could have happened had the axis won.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 01:39 AM
Jul 2013

As it turns out, war is a pretty dangerous affair and people die in dangerous affairs.

So because you fought in an immoral war it means all wars are immoral? Is that what you're getting at?

85 million dead. The vast majority of those were victims of the the Axis powers.

After the war ended, we liberated roughly 4 million people from concentration camps. But that doesn't bode well with your preconceived narrative. And you're a history teacher so that means whatever I say is wrong, right? Spare me. Some of the most historically illiterate people I know have degrees in history.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
7. Another great quote from Butler on corporate war mongering:
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:48 PM
Jun 2013

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”

http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/115545.Smedley_D_Butler


pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
18. You and me both, bro
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 01:39 AM
Jul 2013

I lost way too many friends in Vietnam for nothing.

I had a roommate who was awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously. But it really blows me away to see the image of Butler's TWO Medal of Honor ribbons.

Doc_Technical

(3,526 posts)
12. To quote Country Joe McDonald
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jun 2013

"There's plenty good money to be made
By supplying the Army with the tools of it's trade"

The purpose of war is to make billionaires into trillion-aires.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
16. War is only good for those who MAKE WAR... The less than 1% Suffer
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jun 2013

from it...but those who make it PROSPER. It's always been like that. Even in the so called Noble Wars...the results are still the same...but in those wars the 1% are Proud of their Dead...saying they Died for "Peace/Freedom/Liberation." It's a good excuse...but it's still the 1% that cause them through their actions or inactions...and the rest who suffer during and the aftermath.

War is Good for Nothing...In the End....imho

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
23. 1%, Military Contractors, Wall Street, Military Industrial Complex, Military (Generals in Particular
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jul 2013

Rand Corporation, Think Tanks that get Air Time on C-Span..Military Weapons Producers...Large Arms Manufacturers, Drone Suppliers, Robotic Arms and the rest of the MIC..all around the USA and DC Beltway!

That's who Profits.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
28. All wars are hell on earth. But some are necessary.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:55 PM
Jul 2013

Sometimes you have to defend what's yours, country, land, or people. Just like you and your family. If a home invader comes in, you defend, don't you? You don't just sit back and act like Ghandi?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
30. I've sort of been interested in studying why ancient civilizations went to war
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:27 PM
Jul 2013

and I end up going to one of the first wars in history that was recorded in song and poetry, not chiseled on the wall of a temple, or recounted on a clay tablet. That war was the Trojan war. No, it really wasn't about Helen. Agamemnon could not have assembled the war lords he did to get his brother Menelaus's woman and treasury back. It was a wonderful excuse to get rid of a problem. The inhabitants of the Troad exacted tribute from any ships who wanted to sail to the Black Sea and a wealth of goods they wanted to trade for with the inhabitants beyond there. The Hellenes were sea farers and traders and they had resented having to pay the Trojans for access to the places they wanted to trade. So there was war and both sides bled for it.

However, there was another faction in play here, the gods. They were the ones who set the whole thing in motion to begin with and after things got started, they sat up on Olympus watching the events and pitting one faction against the other, making bets with each other and sometimes, but not often getting involved. Of course there were the winners, the Greeks and the losers the Trojans, but the gods lost nothing. In fact they had gained so much in sacrifice and offerings that they generously allowed Helen to return unharmed to her husband, Menelaus, and both ended up in the Elysian fields.

Agamemnon didn't fare so well, however that's another story. My point is that the gods who set in motion global wars today are the real players here. Today they may be the global oil industrialists, or those who have so much money as to be untouchable even to the nations who pay them homage. They determine who will go to war, make sure we have all the right enemies to hate, even if they never were an enemy before and then they sit back and reap the profits. Our lives are cheap to them as much as the lives of humans were to the Greek gods.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»War? What is it good for?