Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:19 PM Jun 2013

Federal panel: Neb city's immigration law legal(bans employing or renting to those not here legally)

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — An eastern Nebraska city's ordinance that bans employing or renting property to people who are not in the U.S. legally is valid, a federal appeals panel ruled Friday, opening the door for Freemont to begin enforcing its law.

In 2010, voters in the city of about 26,000 easily approved the measure. The ordinance also required businesses to use federal E-verify software to check on potential employees.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp ruled that the part of the 2010 ordinance denying housing permits to those not in the country legally are discriminatory and interfere with federal law.

On Friday, two judges of a three-member panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that reasoning, leading the majority to reverse the ruling and vacate the lower court's injunction against that part of the ordinance.

Judge James Loken wrote that the plaintiffs — several U.S.-born Latino home renters and a Fremont landlord — failed to show the law was intended to discriminate against Latinos or that it intrudes on federal law

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/federal-panel-neb-citys-immigration-law-legal-0

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal panel: Neb city's immigration law legal(bans employing or renting to those not here legally) (Original Post) The Straight Story Jun 2013 OP
Uh Huh atreides1 Jun 2013 #1

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
1. Uh Huh
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:31 PM
Jun 2013

"Judge James Loken wrote that the plaintiffs — several U.S.-born Latino home renters and a Fremont landlord — failed to show the law was intended to discriminate against Latinos or that it intrudes on federal law."

Of course it wasn't intended to discriminate against Latinos, it was directed against the 0.1% Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders that live in Nebraska...


"Judge Steven Colloton agreed with the reversal and vacating of the injunction, but said the plaintiffs lacked standing in the case, noting that they did not show how they had been harmed by Fremont's law."

So they have to wait until they are discriminated against before they have standing?


Won't be much longer before Nebraska and other states pass this type of law, will it?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal panel: Neb city's...