General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWomen Losing Their Health Care Rights To Religious Freaks One State At A Time.
The GOP is making it clear that its main governance goal is to remove a woman's right to control her health, the size of her family and her future. The open assault on women's freedom by the GOP is about taking away even their ability to access birth control. Even women who are raped and suffer from incest are being denied any say in their future if they become pregnant.
The new GOP Taliban is doing this mayhem openly and in secret (the Ohio budget bill). They are making it clear that they will force their will despite all protest. Their belief is that they will be able to stop women from voting with the new SCOTUS ruling. They are getting more brazen all the time.
The religious freaks seem to be control of many legislative agendas
atreides1
(16,079 posts)And those religious freaks are not all men...there are more then enough women who are assisting in taking away a woman's right to choose, and eventually they will help in trying to keep women from voting.
You know what a Judas Goat is...well in the Republican/Tea Party they have a lot of Judas goats, who are women!!!
My apologies to anyone who may take offense to the description, but maybe it's time to quit playing nice.
janlyn
(735 posts)with a friend about the connection to religious zealotry and the degradation of womens rights throughout history. The disproportionate number of women killed during the spanish inquisition and the Salem witch trials, to name just 2 examples.
So what is it that make fundamentalists soooo afraid of women?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)The female, goddess-centered religions were largely brutally stomped down by the patriarchal, twisted monotheisms like Christianity and Islam. Of course "God" and the major players (Jesus, Mohammad, etc.) are all male in these off-kilter, off-balance belief systems, which have been a scourge upon the planet for centuries in so many ways.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)the USA, if they want to live the life of a Taliban then they need to seek countries in which the Taliban operate.
Triana
(22,666 posts)And what they are advocating/pushing is nothing less than sexual and reproductive slavery.
Reference:
http://www.thenation.com/article/166961/reproductive-rights-and-long-hand-slave-breeding#
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/04/california-judge-rules-assault-wasnt-rape-because-woman-wasnt-married/
ie:
That requires that we look to history and the Constitution. I found myself doing that a few weeks back, sitting in the DC living room of Pamela Bridgewater, talking about slavery as the TV news followed the debate over whether the State of Virginia should force a woman to spread her legs and endure a plastic wand shoved into her vagina. Pamela has a lot of titles that, properly, ought to compel me to refer to her now as Professor Bridgewaterlegal scholar, teacher at American University, reproductive rights activist, sex radicalbut she is my friend and sister, and we were two women sitting around talking, so I shall alternate between the familiar and the formal.
What a spectacle, Pamela exclaimed, Virginia, the birthplace of the slave breeding industry in America, is debating state-sanctioned rape. Imagine the woman who says No to this as a prerequisite for abortion. Will she be strapped down, her ankles shackled to stir-ups?
I suspect, said I, that partisans would say, If she doesnt agree, she is free to leave.?
Right, which means she is coerced into childbearing or coerced into taking other measures to terminate her pregnancy, which may or may not be safe. Or she relents and says Yes, and thats by coercion, too.
Scratch at modern life and theres a little slave era just below the surface, so were right back to your argument.
The article continues:
It's human rights abuse piled on top of human rights abuses of women in this country. It's immoral as hell. Evil, in fact. Evil pretentiously veiled with pretty religiosity and petty pretense.
The foregoing is the merest scaffolding of one of the building blocks of Bridgewaters argument, which continues thus. If we integrate the lost chapter of slave breeding into those two traditional but separate stories, if we reconcile female slave resistance to coerced breeding as, in part, a struggle for emancipation and, in part, a struggle for reproductive freedom, the two tales become one: a comprehensive narrative that fuses the pursuit of reproductive freedom into the pursuit of civil freedom.
Constitutionally, the fundamental civil freedom is enshrined in the Thirteenth Amendment. The amendments language is unadorned, so it was left to the political system to sort out what the abolition of slavery meant in all particulars. In a series of successive legal cases, the courts ruled that in prohibiting slavery the amendment also prohibits what the judiciary called its badges and incidents, and recognized Congresss power to pass all laws necessary and proper for abolishing all [of those] in the United States.
Bridgewater argues that because slavery depended on the slaveholders right to control the bodies and reproductive capacities of enslaved women, coerced reproduction was as basic to the institution as forced labor. At the very least it qualifies among those badges and incidents, certainly as much as the inability to make contracts. Therefore, sexual and reproductive freedom is not simply a matter of privacy; it is fundamental to our and the laws understanding of human autonomy and liberty. And so constraints on that freedom are not simply unconstitutional; they effectively reinstitute slavery.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)So much there I had never even considered.
I'm buying "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl" from Amazon.
Thanks for posting.
on edit: Loved this:
If there is an upside to the rights latest, seemingly loony and certainly grotesque multi-front assault on women, it is the clarion it sounds to humanists to take the high ground and ditch the anodyne talk of a womans right to choose for the weightier, fundamental assertion of a womans right to be.
Viva_Daddy
(785 posts)is subject to the Bible and all its bronze-age wisdom.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)They're not REALLY looking to take women back to the 11th century.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Or they would be trying that tactic too!
Bryn
(3,621 posts)I have known her since we were children and she was one of my neighbors.
All I posted is this:
Tweet of the Day:
There's never been one piece of legislation related to men's bodies in the US. But about 640, this year, to regulate women's.
She replied:
" If u are talking about abortion, this procedure is not about regulating female parts. It's about regulating a baby's body parts. Two separate issues. It's barbaric, and criminal, and needs to be stopped. Respect life, ALL life."
Then she defriended me before I could reply.
I am so disgusted!!