Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill US General Find Immunity from Obama's Selective Wrath for Leakers?
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/06/28Published on Friday, June 28, 2013 by Common Dreams
Will US General Find Immunity from Obama's Selective Wrath for Leakers?
Retired vice chairman of Joint Chiefs credited as director of Stuxnet attack against Iran is now focus of DOJ investigation
- Jon Queally, staff writer
<edit>
James Cartwright as vice-chairman of the joint chiefs of staff in 2011. (Photograph: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Reporting by NBC News indicates that (Ret.) US Marine Gen. James Cartwright, who served as vice chairman on Obama's Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been named as the focus of Justice Department investigation ordered by the White House to determine which officials may have been the source for revealing details about a US cyber-attack against Iran in 2010
<edit>
News about the Justice Department's investigation against Cartwright comes as the Obama faces heightened criticism for both how his country conducts itself relative to cyber-surveillance abroad and specifically for a seemingly double-standard when it comes to government leaks of classified information.
As many have pointed out, the Obama administration has proven itself very adept at taking advantage of anonymous leaks of classified information that reflect positively on the White House, but have been by far the most aggressive prosecutors when it comes to going after those who leak information unfavorable to government policies.
And, as historian and foreign policy expert Juan Cole writes on Friday, the news should also highlight some of the damning bits of information that have come to light in recent months about how the US government has not only handled internal leaks, but also about how it has used its surveillance capabilities to target journalists and other American civilians:
more...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 545 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will US General Find Immunity from Obama's Selective Wrath for Leakers? (Original Post)
Karmadillo
Jun 2013
OP
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)1. Juan Cole: Top Ten Ways the Beltway Press Will Treat Gen. Cartwright Differently from Snowden
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/28-1
<edit>
High government officials in Washington routinely leak classified information, as part of turf battles inside the government. Cartwright may have been using Sanger to ensure that Stuxnet was not wholly abandoned (it was his baby). That such leaks are so routine, and are part of Washingtons way of doing business, is what makes the harsh espionage charges against people like Edward Snowden so hypocritical. He who is without leaks should cast the first stone.
The Cartwright story (and remember that he is only a suspect) intersects with Edward Snowdens revelations about National Security Administration spying in many ways. It seems likely that suspicion is now falling on Cartwright because the NSA knows David Sangers phone number and has been looking at everyone he talked to on the phone in the months leading up to his article. We know that the NSA has been repeatedly requesting massive amounts of US phone information and storing it for easy search. Since Sangers article is proof that an illegal act was committed, as Obama said at the time, getting a FISA warrant to go through Sangers already-stored records would have been childs play. When the PATRIOT Act was proposed, the FBI promised it would be used only for counter-terrorism. But that promise has for many years rung hollow.
<edit>
Since Cartwright is a member of the inside-the-Beltway elite, you can bet that the courtier press will not treat him the way they have Edward Snowden, even if he proves guilty. Here will be the differences:
1.No one will obsess about the exercise habits of Gen. Cartwrights wife.
2.Gen. Cartwright will not be characterized as a 63-year-old hacker.
3.Gen. Cartwright will not be described as nerdy or flaky.
4.David Gregory will not ask that David Sanger be prosecuted for espionage because he aided and abetted Cartwrights leaking.
5.We wont get stories every day about where in McLean, Virginia, Gen. Cartwright is living.
6.Gen. Cartwright wont be accused of being a spy for Iran.
7.No lurid stories will be rehearsed on the Sunday afternoon shows about Cartwrights allegedly overly familiar relationship with a young female aide in 2009, with heavy innuendo as to what the episode said about his reckless character.
8.No FBI informants will be placed inside the elite Alfalfa Club in DC that Cartwright was known to attend.
9.Cartwrights loyalty to the United States wont be impugned by anchors or congressmen.
10.Dirt wont be dug up on David Sangers private life in an attempt to discredit his reporting on Cartwrights Stuxnet.
more...
<edit>
High government officials in Washington routinely leak classified information, as part of turf battles inside the government. Cartwright may have been using Sanger to ensure that Stuxnet was not wholly abandoned (it was his baby). That such leaks are so routine, and are part of Washingtons way of doing business, is what makes the harsh espionage charges against people like Edward Snowden so hypocritical. He who is without leaks should cast the first stone.
The Cartwright story (and remember that he is only a suspect) intersects with Edward Snowdens revelations about National Security Administration spying in many ways. It seems likely that suspicion is now falling on Cartwright because the NSA knows David Sangers phone number and has been looking at everyone he talked to on the phone in the months leading up to his article. We know that the NSA has been repeatedly requesting massive amounts of US phone information and storing it for easy search. Since Sangers article is proof that an illegal act was committed, as Obama said at the time, getting a FISA warrant to go through Sangers already-stored records would have been childs play. When the PATRIOT Act was proposed, the FBI promised it would be used only for counter-terrorism. But that promise has for many years rung hollow.
<edit>
Since Cartwright is a member of the inside-the-Beltway elite, you can bet that the courtier press will not treat him the way they have Edward Snowden, even if he proves guilty. Here will be the differences:
1.No one will obsess about the exercise habits of Gen. Cartwrights wife.
2.Gen. Cartwright will not be characterized as a 63-year-old hacker.
3.Gen. Cartwright will not be described as nerdy or flaky.
4.David Gregory will not ask that David Sanger be prosecuted for espionage because he aided and abetted Cartwrights leaking.
5.We wont get stories every day about where in McLean, Virginia, Gen. Cartwright is living.
6.Gen. Cartwright wont be accused of being a spy for Iran.
7.No lurid stories will be rehearsed on the Sunday afternoon shows about Cartwrights allegedly overly familiar relationship with a young female aide in 2009, with heavy innuendo as to what the episode said about his reckless character.
8.No FBI informants will be placed inside the elite Alfalfa Club in DC that Cartwright was known to attend.
9.Cartwrights loyalty to the United States wont be impugned by anchors or congressmen.
10.Dirt wont be dug up on David Sangers private life in an attempt to discredit his reporting on Cartwrights Stuxnet.
more...
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. du rec.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)3. k and r