Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:44 AM Jun 2013

Business Week publishes story bashing Apple's new ad campaign.

Fails to mention that the source for the story is a PR firm working for Samsung.

http://verynicewebsite.net/2013/06/money-well-spent

In years past, Business Week has published stories saying that the iMac, iPods, Apple Store, iPhones, and iPads would all be failures.

I wonder who paid to have those 'news stories' published?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Business Week publishes story bashing Apple's new ad campaign. (Original Post) onehandle Jun 2013 OP
Their ads are why I don't care for Apple and tend to avoid their products. Sorry. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #1
To be fair, kentauros Jun 2013 #2
To be even more fairer Berlum Jun 2013 #3
Okay, kentauros Jun 2013 #6
We are adults, or I am. I know how they make i Pad. So when they tell me it is 'magical' Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #4
It doesn't look like Bloomberg fooled anyone... RevStPatrick Jun 2013 #5
It's just a sappy ad. HappyMe Jun 2013 #7
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
1. Their ads are why I don't care for Apple and tend to avoid their products. Sorry.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:01 PM
Jun 2013

I really hate their ads, almost all of them. The methods they use make me ill. I will now go read the article you linked to see if it agrees with me.
Link does not open and is not to Business Week....hmmmm.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
2. To be fair,
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:08 PM
Jun 2013

it is rather sappy in its composition. I've watched it, with the sound off, because that's one of the best ways to determine if an ad "works" in selling the product. What I viewed gave me the sense that it lacked anything that would convince me to even research the product. Happy, satisfied people aren't enough in the details department

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
6. Okay,
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jun 2013

though that says nothing about how well or not a particular ad campaign works. What you're pointing out is brand loyalty, which doesn't normally work as an advertising technique. What you want is to gain new people to become "brand loyal" but they won't be if that's all they see from the company.

Details are more important if you want new people to buy your product.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. We are adults, or I am. I know how they make i Pad. So when they tell me it is 'magical'
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:15 PM
Jun 2013

and 'empowering' that's too much for me. Active denial of how we make such things is horrific and if there is karma, that is what Jobs is learning now, in his life as an i-slug.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
5. It doesn't look like Bloomberg fooled anyone...
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:27 PM
Jun 2013

Most of the reader comments are about how Ace Metrix works for Samsung.
More "journalism" by press release.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Business Week publishes s...