Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:06 PM Jun 2013

Rachel Jeantel - English as a second language..


Speaks Creole and Spanish as primary..English is a second language...

I had no problem understanding her..she is of Haitian descent...

Why do people have a hard time with accents? I had no problem understanding her..

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Jeantel - English as a second language.. (Original Post) HipChick Jun 2013 OP
Because some Americans are close minded xenophobic racist bigots. Nt. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #1
I speak the Queen's English.. HipChick Jun 2013 #5
She sounds like she has a slight speech impediment. AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #2
She has braces on also,it can hamper your speech HipChick Jun 2013 #3
Ah, that must be it. Thanks for the info. nt AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #8
Is the redirect over? woolldog Jun 2013 #4
What was the redirect? HipChick Jun 2013 #7
it's when the prosecutor asks her more questions woolldog Jun 2013 #11
Really! that's very interesting flamingdem Jun 2013 #6
Unless they're trying to insinuate she doesn't understand English enough WolverineDG Jun 2013 #9
I didn't notice an accent. I only watched for a few minutes today, but pnwmom Jun 2013 #19
I think what the prosecutor was getting at was this: Marrah_G Jun 2013 #10
She is a hero (or heroine, if you prefer) JaneQPublic Jun 2013 #12
I think her syntax is affected by the different grammar structures DevonRex Jun 2013 #13
True..I speak 3 languages.. HipChick Jun 2013 #16
plus the sound isn't the greatest. Whisp Jun 2013 #14
Where did you find information of her ancestry and spoken languages ? NM_Birder Jun 2013 #15
Her last name...and she was asked about it in court HipChick Jun 2013 #17
I found it, thanks. NM_Birder Jun 2013 #20
Gives racists on the jury an excuse to dismiss her testimony. ieoeja Jun 2013 #18
I don't think the jury will dismiss her testimony based on her race. NM_Birder Jun 2013 #21

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
5. I speak the Queen's English..
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:13 PM
Jun 2013

yet, I have American's wrinkle their nose at me, and not understand my British accent

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
11. it's when the prosecutor asks her more questions
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:19 PM
Jun 2013

after the defense attorney is done with his cross exam.

Thought he would spend more time trying to smooth over inconsistencies and problems with her testimony etc

WolverineDG

(22,298 posts)
9. Unless they're trying to insinuate she doesn't understand English enough
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:17 PM
Jun 2013

to understand what she heard, this line of questioning is, imo, racist. I can understand what she's saying & she doesn't sound like she has any sort of accent to me.

pnwmom

(108,988 posts)
19. I didn't notice an accent. I only watched for a few minutes today, but
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:55 PM
Jun 2013

I did see her look confused when an attorney asked her a question with the word "derogatory" -- and I was pretty sure she didn't know the word and answered "yes" when she probably would have said "no" if she'd understood it.

But I blame the attorney for that. If I'd been him, I would have adjusted my questioning to the circumstances and asked my question much more clearly.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
10. I think what the prosecutor was getting at was this:
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:17 PM
Jun 2013

Sometimes language, especially multiple languages within a culture can have phrases and terms that people outside of that culture or region would not understand.

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
12. She is a hero (or heroine, if you prefer)
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:19 PM
Jun 2013

She, along with Wendy Davis and Edie Windsor.

Rachel's poise at such a young age is very inspiring.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
13. I think her syntax is affected by the different grammar structures
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:24 PM
Jun 2013

and it makes it difficult for people who aren't used to scrambling syntax in their heads. If you've taken other languages or speak other languages, or you're just linguistically talented, it's easy to understand her.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
14. plus the sound isn't the greatest.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:26 PM
Jun 2013

the Defense was muffling and mumbling in some parts.

she should be fluent in The Queen's English, donchaknow otherwise why take the stand. fuck.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
20. I found it, thanks.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:44 PM
Jun 2013

Don't see the relevance of her parents ancestry, but saw your thread and was curious.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
18. Gives racists on the jury an excuse to dismiss her testimony.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:54 PM
Jun 2013

Sat on a jury regarding a traffic accident. The defendant ran a red light and t-boned a car. Driver of the car claimed to have neurological damage.

Plaintiff brought in medical experts to testify.

Defendant said, "but he looks okay to me."


First vote, 9-3 in favor of defendant!

I pointed out that the 100% of the evidence presented in the trial favored the plaintiff. Brought about half of them over that quickly.

Most prominent argument in favor of defendant: the passenger in the car first said the plaintiff hit his head on the windshield then changed her testimony to side mirror. Passenger's first language was Spanish and clearly misspoke. But it gave them an excuse to dismiss her testimony.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
21. I don't think the jury will dismiss her testimony based on her race.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:04 PM
Jun 2013


I think the problem she has brought to the proceedings are the inconsistencies in some of her testimony, not her race, nor the implied racism on the jury.

An inconsistency, ANY inconsistency no matter how trivial will be pounced upon by either side, especially in a case like this, and most especially in this specific case. From what I have been able to see, the prosecution did a marginal job at best of preparing her for the stand.

Not the way I thought this case would start. Inconsistencies in testimony, along with the twitter dumping to hide juvenile language and behavior ? I think those are the reasons she put herself in a the crosshairs of the defense.

Was anticipating a more efficient presentation of the facts by the prosecution, no favors for Trayvon's justice so far.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Jeantel - English ...