Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,079 posts)
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:38 AM Jun 2013

Robert Reich on Clarence Thomas...

https://www.facebook.com/RBReich?hc_location=stream

Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham, Clarence Thomas, and I all took a course at Yale Law School together called "Civil and Political Rights," taught by Professor Thomas Emerson. Bill was not the most reliable or disciplined attendee (he was often off working on some election), but when he was there he answered every question correctly. Hillary was always an active and enthusiastic participant. I tried as best I could. Clarence, however, sat in the back of the classroom the whole semester with a scowl on his face, never raising his hand, never answering a question, never offering a single word. That was over forty years ago but it seems like only yesterday.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich on Clarence Thomas... (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2013 OP
Here is Clarence Thomas' philosophy in a nutshell. ananda Jun 2013 #1
yes indeed especially the African-Americans. Why does he hate his own community? southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #4
He doesn't hate us JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #5
Stand corrected. Really it is sooo sad for a man to be that way. southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #8
That was my first thought, too... We People Jun 2013 #9
Or rather JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #10
scowl on his face, never raising his hand, never answering a question, never offering a single word" PearliePoo2 Jun 2013 #2
Same old same old. Bake Jun 2013 #11
consistant - the emphasis on con leftyohiolib Jun 2013 #3
hard to think of anyone more undeserving of being on the SCOTUS RussBLib Jun 2013 #6
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose Arugula Latte Jun 2013 #7
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2013 #12

ananda

(28,870 posts)
1. Here is Clarence Thomas' philosophy in a nutshell.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:42 AM
Jun 2013

I used affirmative action and every social safety program available and got mine.

Now that I have mine, screw everybody else.

JustAnotherGen

(31,834 posts)
5. He doesn't hate us
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:35 AM
Jun 2013

He's ashamed of us.

Something happened WITHING him many many years ago that he felt a need to distance himself from other black Americans.


And it has nothing to do with who he married. My parents - same family dynamic.

It has to do with something in him where he is deeply deeply ashamed of himself - and the rest of us.

We People

(619 posts)
9. That was my first thought, too...
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe he's trying very hard not to acknowledge his past as long as he was appointed by a Bush. So he wants nothing to do with anything but bootstraps/right wing philosophy.

JustAnotherGen

(31,834 posts)
10. Or rather
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jun 2013

He DOES acknowledge his past - he just doesn't like something that happened in it. I also wonder if that's how he SURVIVED it.

I can't stand him - he has no business sitting in Marshall's seat - but I'm going to at least try to understand him.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
2. scowl on his face, never raising his hand, never answering a question, never offering a single word"
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:45 AM
Jun 2013

Nothing's changed...


Bake

(21,977 posts)
11. Same old same old.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jun 2013

He wasn't interested then and he's not interested now. He's got his orders.



Bake

RussBLib

(9,027 posts)
6. hard to think of anyone more undeserving of being on the SCOTUS
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:38 AM
Jun 2013

well, maybe Rick Perry, Wayne Dahmer, Charles Speck, Charles Manson, etc....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich on Clarence ...