General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUpdated: Greenpeace, NRDC and Sierra Club on President Obama's climate plan
Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:42 AM - Edit history (1)
Obama's Climate Action Plan Will Protect Our Health and Our Communities
President Obama has announced a robust plan for tackling climate change and reducing dangerous carbon pollution. This marks an historic turning point. No longer will power plants be allowed to dump unlimited amounts of carbon into our atmosphere, threatening our health and environment. Instead, we can clean up our skies and leave future generations with a more stable climate.
Without this kind of presidential leadership, our children and grandchildren would be left to cope with the devastating consequences of unchecked climate change. We cant pass this burden on to them, especially when we can already see what climate disruption can do to peoples lives. From the Colorado residents who lost their homes in recent fires to the children who suffer more asthma attacks because of dirtier air, Americans are reeling from climate impacts right now.
President Obamas plan will help us turn the tide. It will make a profound and lasting difference in Americas fight against climate change.
Most significantly the plan will reduce carbon pollution from power plantsthe largest source of global warming emissions in the country. America has set limits for arsenic, lead, and mercury, but we let power plants release as much carbon pollution as they want even though it has serious implications for our health. Several states have stepped in and required power plants to cut carbon. Now its time for the Environmental Protection Agency to close this loophole and reduce this climate threat.
Setting carbon limits is something the EPA can do right now. It already has the authorityand the dutyunder the Clean Air Act to create carbon standards for power plants. The agency can give states the flexibility to figure how to meet those standards. NRDCs experts outlined a similar approach, and we concluded it can cut carbon pollution 26 percent by 2020 and save people money on electricity bills. This represents real and far-reaching carbon reductions.
- more -
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/fbeinecke/obamas_climate_action_plan_wil.html
Doug Howell
Seattle, WA Today President Barack Obama announced his administration's next steps for building a legacy of action to fight the climate crisis. The plan includes new energy efficiency standards for federal buildings and appliances, scales up responsible clean energy production on public lands with an ambitious new commitment to power 6 million homes by 2020, and uses the full authority of the Clean Air Act to cut dangerous carbon pollution from power plants.
"Today's climate announcement from the White House demonstrates the kind of bold leadership we've been waiting for to put us on the right path to fighting the ever-growing climate crisis. We are heartened by his commitment to taking this giant step forward toward meeting our carbon reduction and clean energy goals.
"This news should dramatically impact our Washington utilities. Last month Puget Sound Energy (PSE), a major owner of the Colstrip coal fired power plant in Montana--the largest climate polluter in the Northwest--released its 20 year energy plan without accounting for carbon in its final recommendation. With this additional information, we call on PSE to re-consider the economic risks associated with continuing to rely on its dirty and increasingly expensive coal plant.
"Rather, the commitment to establish new energy efficiency standards for federal buildings and appliances and the promise to increase responsible clean energy production on public lands, is the recipe for a sustainable energy future in Washington.
"The President is stepping up to reduce the carbon pollution that is destabilizing our climate, threatening our economy, and endangering our communities. We now look to our local leaders, regulators and Puget Sound Energy to ensure we take responsibility for this dangerous climate disrupting pollution."
http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2013/06/president-obama-releases-bold-climate-plan
Updated to add:
Today, in his speech at Georgetown University, President Obama challenged us to answer the essential question for every future energy policy decision we face what will the net climate impact be if this project goes forward?
It was a bold, monumental speech, the best by not only this president, but any president to date on the climate crisis. Greenpeace supporters have told Obama for years that the longer he waited to take sides, the worse climate change would get. Todays speech showed that the time has clearly gotten late enough for him to publicly side with the people, not the fossil fuel industry.
We proudly stand with the President in the fight against carbon pollution, but we know that this fight wont be won with words alone.
The President framed the Keystone decision this way:
Our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The net effects of the pipelines impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward.
Within this frame, its clear theres no room in our future for the Keystone pipeline, fracking, Arctic drilling, or giving away our public lands to the coal industry. Each of these projects will have a significant negative climate impact and not be in our national interest.
- more -
http://greenpeaceblogs.org/2013/06/25/president-unveils-obama-climate-pollution-test-for-future-energy-projects/
sheshe2
(83,875 posts)http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/fbeinecke/obamas_climate_action_plan_wil.html
As the Sierra Club said
This is leadership, ProSense~ It will lead this Country forward!
The President said to speak up for the facts! These are the facts!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)politicasista
(14,128 posts)I may be on Ignore, but just kicking a late night thread.
Cha
(297,574 posts)thanks ProSense
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Cha
(297,574 posts)with his gravitas solidly behind it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110211403
thank you, for these statements from our Environmental groups, ProSense.
And, thanks to Greenpeace, NRDC, and Sierra Club for their continuing work for the health of our Planet!
Logical
(22,457 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)agentS
(1,325 posts)The 'hinge' is slightly relevant because even if the pipeline is NOT built, the bitumen will be going to market somewhere. I seriously doubt the Canadian First Nations folks can effectively stop this thing. So we're stuck with that and I'm not seeing it as a big 'hinge' anymore.
The second 'hinge' is the roaring economies of Asia. If those emerging markets trim their oil usage or improve their vehicle emission standards and their power plants (Which China has taken steps to do) then the world stands a chance of making substantive drops in CO2 emissions.
One of our big 'hinges' was introducing CAFEE standards (Gas mileage) and Tesla Motors making a strong showing. IF we can burn LESS gas, and use MORE energy from non-polluting sources, the US will certainly reduce its carbon 'burden'.