General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichael Hastings: FBI Records Lead to Positive ID
So if the FBI wasn't investigating Hastings, what were they doing with his fingerprints on file?
The L.A. County Department of Coroner today confirmed that the burned body found in the charred Mercedes that crashed in Hollywood early Tuesday was indeed that of noted journalist Michael Hastings.
The remains of 33-year-old Michael Mahon Hastings were identified through fingerprint records "obtained from the FBI," coroner's Lt. Fred Corral told us:
<snip>
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_identified_hollywood_crash.php
morningfog
(18,115 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)One of the key questions is what the toxicology reports will show.
cali
(114,904 posts)and does the FBI have the fingerprints of everyone who has ever been convicted or charged with DUI?
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)The writer does have a history with alcohol and drugs, however. In his first book, I Lost My Love in Baghdad: A Modern War Story, Hastings says that he crashed a car in a drunk-driving accident when he was 19.
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_crash_engine_flew_speeding_recovery.php
The FBI has been collecting fingerprints from the states since 1999.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/fingerprints_biometrics/iafis/iafis
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I'm sure a lot of local police departments aren't fully linked in, like say DeSoto MO
Sharing of information is a good thing!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)This was nothing more than a tragic accident. The FBI was not investigating Hastings. The US government did not assassinate Hastings. The reason why he died is because he was driving like a bat out of hell and we have yet to see the toxicology reports.
Of course I'm in the minority and I'm sure a majority of DUers are thinking conspiracy.
That's only because the inmates are now running the asylum here.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Just that the CTers yell a lot louder.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)It's true. I read it right here at the DU.
Sid
cali
(114,904 posts)People who put words in others' mouths? I have made it crystal fucking clear in several threads that I think Hastings death was an accident and yet some little minds insist that I'm pushing some ct theory.
fuck that dishonest pile of stinking shit.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)so put your "despicable" where it belongs.
Sid
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Left me in stitches.
OH...BTW...it's now on the front page of DU.
Now the world can see how batshit crazy this place has become.
cali
(114,904 posts)YOU know that. You have an unpleasant little habit of putting words in other folks' mouths. stop it.
I posted this because the FBI denied investigating Hastings and I was curious as to why they had his fingerprints. and unlike some here, I'm not stupid enough to lap up every word out the authorities mouths as gospel truth.
At least the likes of YOU are in the minority here. that's a small blessing.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Feigning outrage at me while cursing and screaming will do nothing to change that fact.
If I'm in the minority when it comes to conspiracy theories which imply the US government assassinated Hastings by taking control of his car and deliberately crashing it, I consider it a badge of honor.
Yup.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)One would think any white house reporter is bonded and has been officially fingerprinted.
Though I am not sure if a blogger is considered a reporter, but some here have said he was a major reporter,
as such, I am sure every single one has been.
and it's like copyrighting a book in the library of congress.
One doesn't have to be a big time big paid writer.
Anyone can copyright their book and getting an official seal.
so another conspiracy theory that it wasn't him, does not pan out.
Conspiracy theories are not a good thing.
Anyone who is bonded in any profession has been fingerprinted and they are on file.
In fact, I don't personally know anyone who hasn't been.
Nothing sinister about it.
As Bill Shakespeare wrote "much ado about nothing".
Response to graham4anything (Reply #7)
Post removed
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)I don't believe it, we actually agree on something.
Will wonders never cease?
premium
(3,731 posts)fingerprints and DNA samples are taken in case something bad happens and the body is so badly mangled that it's unrecognizable and those samples have to be used for identification purposes.
magellan
(13,257 posts)They wouldn't for a simple DUI as some suggest. There has to have been a government connection at some point to wind up in the FBI's database.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)There doesn't have to be a "government connection."
This law was passed in recognition of the fact that criminals -- including drunk drivers -- do cross state borders.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/fingerprints_biometrics/iafis/iafis
magellan
(13,257 posts)...because he was embedded with the military.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)Here's more info about the FBI fingerprint database.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/fingerprints_biometrics/iafis/iafis
Response to pnwmom (Reply #20)
magellan This message was self-deleted by its author.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Let's say they didn't have his fingerprints, the FBI isn't just going to go up to him and say: "Hey, we're investigating you. Give us some finger prints so we can identify your body after we've killed you."
This is madness.
premium
(3,731 posts)There is no conspiracy here, he died in a tragic auto accident, nothing more, nothing less.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)driving under the influence (my default position until proven otherwise), it truly was a tragic accident; the hero destroyed by his own fatal flaw!
premium
(3,731 posts)was he diabetic? Did he suffer a stroke, heart attack? Did he maybe just fall asleep at the wheel?
The official autopsy should answer some of those questions.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)If they were investigating him and wanted his prints, they would get them off of a discarded can in the recycling or some other unknown way.
I am just addressing your logic. It seems there are at least to valid reasons that they had his prints, the DUI and the foreign journo reasons. I don't think the FBI having his prints indicates a conspiracy.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)but ridiculous questions deserve ridicule.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)What were the FBI doing with Hastings fingerprints on file?
A ridiculous question.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)I wondered the same thing. Fortunately, I didn't ask it here..
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)also, I wouldn't have automatically assumed that the FBI has automatic access to that data.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)Vermont came after me for a hitchhiking ticket from decades ago! I couldn't renew my license until I paid them. grr
zappaman
(20,606 posts)and had security clearances to talk to the people he has talked to...and you wondered why the FBI would have his fingerprints?
Seriously?
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)And I didn't know that they automatically take all fingerprints of journalists going there.
Seriiously! I am that dense! Feel better now?
Can I just point out that you offered 1 of 3 differing speculative accounts on how they obtained them? So far, I haven't seen a link that tells me which of the 3 sources was used.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)I guess I can't really refuse but I don't like it much.
Watching foreign nationals enter the US and get fingerprinted had me thinking - ain't it grand to be an American
and not have to be finger printed.. oops