Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:04 PM Jun 2013

"Maybe...*tee-hee*...we're not going...*tee-hee*...take it, goodbye...*tee-hee*"



Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor expressed doubt Friday about the decision to take the 2000 Bush v. Gore case that resulted in the election of President George W. Bush.

"It took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue," O'Connor told the Chicago Tribune editorial board in an interview. "Maybe the court should have said, 'We're not going to take it, goodbye.'"

"Obviously the court did reach a decision and thought it had to reach a decision," she said. "It turned out the election authorities in Florida hadn't done a real good job there and kind of messed it up. And probably the Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day."

The Florida Supreme Court ordered a manual recount on Dec. 8, 2000, of all Florida votes in the 2000 presidential election between Vice President Al Gore and Bush, then the governor of Texas. But a 5-4 Supreme Court majority, including O'Connor, ordered an injunction the next day. The Supreme Court ruled on Dec. 12 in a decision "limited to the present circumstances" that the Florida recount was unconstitutional, giving Bush the presidency.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/29/sandra-day-o-connor_n_3177322.html


Just cut to the chase and admit it: "We fucked it up!"

Yeah, thanks Sandy, for nothing! And Bush was a huge nothing!

Do you suppose your former colleagues will come around in 20 years and say of the their Voting Rights Act decision: "Maybe...tee-hee...we shouldn't have...tee-hee...taken it...tee-hee, tee-hee"
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Maybe...*tee-hee*...we're not going...*tee-hee*...take it, goodbye...*tee-hee*" (Original Post) KansDem Jun 2013 OP
Count it any way you want... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #1
I despise that woman and her deadly cohorts. Autumn Jun 2013 #2
"This is terrible" deutsey Jun 2013 #3
I remember this. Her agenda was alsame Jun 2013 #4
I remember a teacher in high school, Mr. Dunphy... KansDem Jun 2013 #6
Mr. Dunphy was a loon. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #8
Some call it treason. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #5
Sandy Baby, Still Clueless After All These Years. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #7
Well ain't she sweet, washing her hands of it now? LaydeeBug Jun 2013 #9
lol Hydra Jun 2013 #10
Yeah, Bush v. Gore was a massive fuck up on multiple levels.Worst decision ever!! Initech Jun 2013 #11

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
3. "This is terrible"
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:11 PM
Jun 2013

"...Sitting in her hostess's den, staring at a small black-and-white television set, she visibly started when CBS anchor Dan Rather called Florida for Al Gore. 'This is terrible,' she exclaimed. She explained to another partygoer that Gore's reported victory in Florida meant that the election was 'over,' since Gore had already carried two other swing states, Michigan and Illinois.

"Moments later, with an air of obvious disgust, she rose to get a plate of food, leaving it to her husband to explain her somewhat uncharacteristic outburst. John O'Connor said his wife was upset because they wanted to retire to Arizona, and a Gore win meant they'd have to wait another four years."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2000/12/24/the-truth-behind-the-pillars.html

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
6. I remember a teacher in high school, Mr. Dunphy...
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jun 2013

During a class on American government, told us the following:

You can criticize the Executive and Legislative branches of the US government because those members are elected based on politics. But you shouldn't criticize the members of the Judicial branch because they are there based on intellect and wisdom. They are above politics.


It was one of those moments that you remember like it happened yesterday and I took his explanation with me for some 40 years: the president and members of Congress could be criticized, but always respect the Supreme Court.

But, considering Bush v. Gore and "Citizens United," considering the recent Voter Rights Act decision, considering that Justices Scalia, Alito, and Thomas appear at right-wing fund raisers, I have changed my mind.

Sorry, Mr. Dunphy, Supreme Court justices are influence by politics and have become party hacks...

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
10. lol
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 03:14 PM
Jun 2013
In 2011, she told the Aspen Ideas Festival that the outcome wasn't the "end of the world."


Sandra, you were the swing vote, and you voted to do the wrong thing. You get to live with it, and everything that came afterward was basically your fault.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Maybe...*tee-hee*...we'r...