The Other Snowden Drama: Impugning the Messenger

[cali]

As a pure story, it’s tough to beat the Snowden saga. Man of intrigue? Roger. Crusading reporter? Check. A powerful government in hot pursuit? Yessir. Unclear agendas by foreign countries? Most certainly.

And as Edward J. Snowden made his way across the globe with a disintegrating passport and newly emerged allies, Twitter was there, serving up a new kind of chase coverage, with breathless updates from hovering digital observers speculating about the fleeing leaker’s next move. All day Sunday, it was like watching a spy movie unfold in pixels, except it was all very real and no one knows how it ends.

Almost lost in the international drama was a journalistic one in which Glenn Greenwald, the columnist from The Guardian, found himself in the gunsights on a Sunday morning talk show. The episode was part of a continuing story about the role of the press in conveying secrets to the public.

If you add up the pulling of news organization phone records (The Associated Press), the tracking of individual reporters (Fox News), and the effort by the current administration to go after sources (seven instances and counting in which a government official has been criminally charged with leaking classified information to the news media), suggesting that there is a war on the press is less hyperbole than simple math.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/business/media/the-other-snowden-drama-impugning-the-messenger.html

[RetroLounge]

1. But this doesn't fit the narrative the pom pom squad is pushing...

RL

[Demit]

2. "Politicians would like to conflate the actions of reporters and their sources, but the law

draws a very clear and bright line between the two in an effort to protect speech and enable transparency."

That's my takeaway line from David Carr's very good essay.