Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:55 PM Jun 2013

I suggest that if you are worried about the NSA rather than the FBI...

... then you have managed to get the releases from the past few weeks exactly backwards. The NSA protocols are a good deal better than I had worried they were since 2008. The situation with the FBI is more troubling.

Then again DU at large doesn't seem to get that these are two very different things.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I suggest that if you are worried about the NSA rather than the FBI... (Original Post) Recursion Jun 2013 OP
The FBI gets some of its intelligence from the NSA magellan Jun 2013 #1
That synecdoche is part of the board's disconnect here Recursion Jun 2013 #4
Except the FISA order is for Verizon to turn all its records over to the NSA. magellan Jun 2013 #14
See Mueller's comments on that; the FBI is the requesting and receiving agency Recursion Jun 2013 #15
Oh, but turf wars and all that? magellan Jun 2013 #18
Good question (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #19
I hope they got their looks from mom... jberryhill Jun 2013 #10
Did I miss something? What's up with the FBI? Autumn Jun 2013 #2
They do the dirty work for the NSA...? kentuck Jun 2013 #3
It's a mystery. Maybe one has to be in the loop Autumn Jun 2013 #6
No, it's all in the papers, the FBI is just better at timing their releases it seems Recursion Jun 2013 #7
Don't they all work in cahoots? I thought they started doing that after 911. Autumn Jun 2013 #9
Well, that I can answer with a resounding "no" Recursion Jun 2013 #12
I think I'll worry about both of them. Autumn Jun 2013 #17
And the new building in Utah is for the FBI? kentuck Jun 2013 #11
That's the GSA (GSA, not NSA) as far as everything I've seen in the news indicates Recursion Jun 2013 #13
I had heard differently. kentuck Jun 2013 #16
Patriot Act Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #5
Allows? Yes. Turf wars don't go away by statute, though Recursion Jun 2013 #8
FBI people are true believers pscot Jun 2013 #20
Thanks for the info! nt Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #21

magellan

(13,257 posts)
1. The FBI gets some of its intelligence from the NSA
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:57 PM
Jun 2013

"NSA" covers the whole icky surveillance ball of wax to me.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. That synecdoche is part of the board's disconnect here
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:03 AM
Jun 2013

The turf war among NSA, FBI, and CIA never stopped and this notion of a monolithic "security state" is kind of silly.

Short version:

The NSA, as authorized by the 2008 FISA amendment, monitors the communications of suspected foreign threats to the US. Digital communication being what it is, in the process of doing that, they sometimes also end up monitoring the communications of Americans. As we found out, when this happens, they have to destroy the information unless certain criteria are met, some of which are IMO too broad, but I had thought since 2008 that they kept all incidental taps, which apparently is not the case. This process is primarily Internet-focused rather than telephony-focused, but most telephone traffic goes through the Internet at some point nowadays.

The FBI, in an unrelated and uncoordinated program, is collecting significant amounts of data about the phone communications of all Americans, and this mass cultural confusion about which organization is what seems to have let them bury that in the NSA news story.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
14. Except the FISA order is for Verizon to turn all its records over to the NSA.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:15 AM
Jun 2013

2nd para:

"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, the Custodian of Records shall produce to the National Security Agency (NSA) upon service of this Order, and continue production on an ongoing daily basis thereafter for the duration of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, an electronic copy of the following tangible things: all call detail records or "telephony metadata" created by Verizon for communications (i) between the United States and abroad; or (ii) wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls."

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
15. See Mueller's comments on that; the FBI is the requesting and receiving agency
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:18 AM
Jun 2013

Though the NSA does the legwork since they have the servers.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
18. Oh, but turf wars and all that?
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:23 AM
Jun 2013

Does the NSA hold the intelligence it's collected from the telcos for ransom or does it let the FBI have it as needed?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. No, it's all in the papers, the FBI is just better at timing their releases it seems
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:05 AM
Jun 2013

The bulk request from the US phone carriers was for the FBI, not the NSA. The NSA doesn't do bulk requests; it tracks specific communications profiles.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. Well, that I can answer with a resounding "no"
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:11 AM
Jun 2013

Bureaucratic infighting is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The NSA under certain conditions is required to forward evidence of criminal activity to the FBI (those conditions are problematic and I think should be tightened up). The FBI under broader conditions is allowed to forward evidence of foreign threats to the US to the NSA. But the FBI also considers many foreign threats to the US to be under its own jurisdiction.

There's not a monolithic surveillance state; there are several competing agencies trying to justify their budgets.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. That's the GSA (GSA, not NSA) as far as everything I've seen in the news indicates
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:13 AM
Jun 2013

I'm not sure why that particular story attracts so much attention; there are bigger datacenters being planned as it is, for both the public and private sector.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. Allows? Yes. Turf wars don't go away by statute, though
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jun 2013

And, anyways, if we're to believe Snowden the NSA recognizes two primary sources of information on communications: data procured from providers by a warrant, and upstream tapping on the physical lines. That's why the kind of request the FBI is making wouldn't help them.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
20. FBI people are true believers
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

NSA are IT guys and airport gropers; ambitious amateurs. The FBI are pros; very smart cops, well steeped in wickedness.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I suggest that if you are...