Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PennsylvaniaMatt

(966 posts)
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:45 AM Jun 2013

Zimmerman Prosecution Opening Statement: "F**king Punks"

Last edited Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:53 PM - Edit history (1)

The prosecutor in the case opened with the words of George Zimmerman..."fucking punks"....uncensored, on LIVE TV, REPEATEDLY!

Chuck Todd jumped in apologizing for the language, saying they needed to implement a 7 second delay.

My thoughts: People everywhere NEEDED to hear that in an uncensored way so they know EXACTLY who Zimmerman is! Good for the prosecution!!!!

107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Zimmerman Prosecution Opening Statement: "F**king Punks" (Original Post) PennsylvaniaMatt Jun 2013 OP
A point of reference would be useful. Was he quoting Zimmerman? Scuba Jun 2013 #1
Yes JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #3
Zim's 911 call. The point being that at the time, Zim knew nothing about this kid msanthrope Jun 2013 #4
It was a non-emergency call. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #5
Difficult to keep all 46 calls straight. nt msanthrope Jun 2013 #6
If it was okay for JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #2
If the phrase offends people lolly Jun 2013 #11
ExacAtically! JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #12
Is the media trying to protect Z's reputation with the public? Z's a thug. freshwest Jun 2013 #96
I agree JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #100
'Out of that grown man's mouth.' Those words explained his motives and all that happened afterward. freshwest Jun 2013 #95
Delighted that the prosecution got that in before malaise Jun 2013 #7
And how stupid are we to think that by bleeping or however we attempt to disguise it, rhett o rick Jun 2013 #8
I agree completely... PennsylvaniaMatt Jun 2013 #9
Louis Black said he cant perform at the Kennedy Center because they counted the number rhett o rick Jun 2013 #20
I remember that! Rebellious Republican Jun 2013 #80
One simply cannot exceed the fuck limit. Enthusiast Jun 2013 #98
"We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won't allow them KurtNYC Jun 2013 #13
You're not saying our government is... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2013 #35
Not always--I do like that "unnecessary censorship" on late night television. MADem Jun 2013 #29
It cracks me up when they "bleep" certain words PatSeg Jun 2013 #38
This is fake, but it's gut-bustingly funny. Adult entertainment (caveat for the easily offended). MADem Jun 2013 #67
Hilarious! Brainstormy Jun 2013 #78
Thanks, very funny! PatSeg Jun 2013 #84
Louis C.K. has a bit about the "n" word that's kind of like that. cui bono Jun 2013 #93
I have been trying to write something about that but not very good at it. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #104
Zimmerman SamKnause Jun 2013 #10
It should not be censored. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #14
exactly arely staircase Jun 2013 #36
tearing off the mask is a good thing carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #15
A powerful opening. Anyone in court who was getting sleepy certainly got a jolt. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #16
An I the only one that finds censored language and bleeping extremely stupid? Dash87 Jun 2013 #17
his defense is awful warrior1 Jun 2013 #18
a knock knock joke warrior1 Jun 2013 #19
Whoose their. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #21
Am I crazy or did Zimmerman's lawyer just open his defense with a knock knock joke? bklyncowgirl Jun 2013 #22
west is just as wacky and emotional as Bernie grok Jun 2013 #23
And a lawyer that doesn't look like ET Awful Jun 2013 #79
Jamie's dancing master exboyfil Jun 2013 #102
"Knock, knock." "Who's there?" "George Zimmerman". "George Zimmerman who". "George Zimmerman, jtuck004 Jun 2013 #24
Don't forget the iced tea. KamaAina Jun 2013 #52
Yeah, that would scare the crap out of anyone. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2013 #55
Fucking useless jeanmarc Jun 2013 #25
Are they covering this trial on national TV? Or just local? nt MADem Jun 2013 #26
there are a few lifestreams going and also HLN (cable) will be broadcasting with MANY bettyellen Jun 2013 #51
Thank you! I have that HLN somewhere, I think...! MADem Jun 2013 #57
It's the Nancy Grace/ Dr Drew station. They drag the trials out all day long, so that they just bettyellen Jun 2013 #58
I turned it on--boy, they do hit that PAUSE button often enough! MADem Jun 2013 #75
you will get to know the commercials by heart on HLN... Are you suffering from mesothelioma? bettyellen Jun 2013 #81
good live stream (and tweets) here: bettyellen Jun 2013 #59
Either the defense attorney is really dumb or really nervous.... PennsylvaniaMatt Jun 2013 #27
Would have been better going with this guy: Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #30
That movie was on yesterday. reflection Jun 2013 #31
George joked about wearing a hoodie, so apparently there's a feeling that if they can make light bettyellen Jun 2013 #62
Maybe he's pushing for a mistrial, or a new jury, a change of lawyers... defacto7 Jun 2013 #94
HLN? Iliyah Jun 2013 #28
link KurtNYC Jun 2013 #32
You know the defense is doing a bad opening statement when chelsea0011 Jun 2013 #33
can i watch online? court tv? arely staircase Jun 2013 #34
Pretty clever by the prosecuter. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #37
This is my John2 Jun 2013 #41
I agree he's guilty as fuck. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #43
The Zimmster had guilt all over his face when he heard his own words Berlum Jun 2013 #56
Could not agree more! n/t marew Jun 2013 #44
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #83
No, the judge will allow those words.... sinkingfeeling Jun 2013 #73
Are They Really Doing What I Think They Are Doing erpowers Jun 2013 #39
Don't believe your lying ears. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #47
Yet South Park ran a counter for each time they said fu#k! SCVDem Jun 2013 #40
Is this trial on live now on MSNBC? senseandsensibility Jun 2013 #42
Keep in mind that the cops let this guy go. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #45
PD is full of Zimmermans mwrguy Jun 2013 #49
That is still so awful to me. Starry Messenger Jun 2013 #53
What's even worse is the way the cops treated the parents.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #65
Totally agree with all of that. Starry Messenger Jun 2013 #71
You hit on it right there. The attitude is that Trayvon wasn't really human... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #72
Ouch. Wait Wut Jun 2013 #46
Whole thing mainstreetonce Jun 2013 #48
I'm at work. Wait Wut Jun 2013 #50
Good one. Don't read my posts, then. IMNSHO, he's guilty as sin! freshwest Jun 2013 #106
I think the prosecution has an impossible task... Ka hrnt Jun 2013 #54
Zimmerman stalked and killed an unarmed teenager who was MINDING HIS OWN BUSINESS Skittles Jun 2013 #60
So standing your ground (BS) with a gun SCVDem Jun 2013 #63
isn't it something? Skittles Jun 2013 #64
Exactly. uppityperson Jun 2013 #70
That pretty much sums it up. Lone_Star_Dem Jun 2013 #74
A citizen volunteer who only cared about his community was attacked by a drug using teenager Renew Deal Jun 2013 #101
he clearly stalked Trayvon Skittles Jun 2013 #103
the physical evidence was very minor (5/8") scratches- no broken nose, no head smashed on concrete bettyellen Jun 2013 #66
That's pretty much how I see it too Captain Stern Jun 2013 #68
Mr. Zimmerman’s injuries support his account????? Politicalboi Jun 2013 #76
But Z's OWN words are self-contradictory in many ways, so tblue37 Jun 2013 #107
Oh noes!@!11!!! Somebody had to heaw a bad word. :( leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #61
WTFuck? Fucking people actually fucking heard the fucking f* word on their fucking tvs? Aw fuck. uppityperson Jun 2013 #69
Perhaps More Importantly DallasNE Jun 2013 #77
This part is John2 Jun 2013 #89
I Answered The Injury Question DallasNE Jun 2013 #92
Works just as well describing the Bush administration tomm2thumbs Jun 2013 #82
In this case words are important. Will MSNBC break some FCC rule? with $$$$$ fine?? YOHABLO Jun 2013 #85
Networks on cable don't have to pay a fine. They're not Raine Jun 2013 #88
Agreed. Apophis Jun 2013 #86
Todd should've watched the Daytime TV Awards on CNN a couple weeks ago Corbin Bernsen Raine Jun 2013 #87
The knock knock "joke" text and video progree Jun 2013 #90
Knock Knock... Who's there? Your career... My career who? Exactly... progree Jun 2013 #91
LOL...did you see the face the prosecutor made? Blue_Roses Jun 2013 #105
speaking of fucking punks Enrique Jun 2013 #97
He doesn't even rise to the level of punk.....nt Enthusiast Jun 2013 #99
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
4. Zim's 911 call. The point being that at the time, Zim knew nothing about this kid
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:50 AM
Jun 2013

except what he could see, and he was ANGRY.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
2. If it was okay for
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:48 AM
Jun 2013

Zimmerman to say - then it's good enough for us to hear.

If it was okay for Zimmerman to say - then it is good enough a word/phrase for us to hear.


He said it - he needs to own it - WE need to own it - and if anyone needs the vapors or salts because of the words being 'repeated' then this case is not for them.

lolly

(3,248 posts)
11. If the phrase offends people
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jun 2013

Then that makes the prosecution's case.

It is/was an offensive statement to make about a 17-year old boy about whom nothing was known at the moment except his race and the fact that he was walking by himself at night.

So I hope it does offend the jurors.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
12. ExacAtically!
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:23 AM
Jun 2013

It does a good job of showing how on the offense Zimmerman was. He definitely decided at that moment - Trayvon was not a human being - he was a "one of them".

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
100. I agree
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 06:49 AM
Jun 2013

And had he shot from his vehicle on a public street it would have been a cut and dried drive by shooting. He has that in him.

He has it in him.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
95. 'Out of that grown man's mouth.' Those words explained his motives and all that happened afterward.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 03:49 AM
Jun 2013

The prosecution is coming out strong with the truth. About him getting out of the car with a fully loaded semi-automatic is very telling.

It shouldn't be censored. This is what Z said and is the reason TM is dead. Z was hunting a stereotype in his mind, not a person.

All those who have stood up for Z and slandered TM need to think who it is - and what it is - they are defending.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
8. And how stupid are we to think that by bleeping or however we attempt to disguise it,
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jun 2013

we wont be able to figure it out. The whole bleeping thing is idiotic.

PennsylvaniaMatt

(966 posts)
9. I agree completely...
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:06 AM
Jun 2013

If you're watching a murder trial on cable TV on a Monday morning, you've heard swear words before...

Who the hell are they kidding!?!?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
20. Louis Black said he cant perform at the Kennedy Center because they counted the number
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:52 AM
Jun 2013

of times he said fuck and apparently it exceeded their limit.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
13. "We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won't allow them
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:26 AM
Jun 2013

to write 'f**k' on their airplanes because it's obscene." -Apocalypse Now (1979)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
29. Not always--I do like that "unnecessary censorship" on late night television.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:25 AM
Jun 2013

However, to be serious, your larger point is valid. Bleeping the word doesn't make it go away, especially nowadays, when the bleep only half the word, so you can tell that it is the fu.. word, and not the sh.. word!

PatSeg

(47,475 posts)
38. It cracks me up when they "bleep" certain words
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jun 2013

on The Daily Show. You can barely tell they've been bleeped. We really need to get over this whole "good words", "okay words", and "bad words".

There have been times when someone on TV slips up and says a "no-no" word and I often don't notice it until I see the reactions of other people.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
67. This is fake, but it's gut-bustingly funny. Adult entertainment (caveat for the easily offended).
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:32 PM
Jun 2013

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
93. Louis C.K. has a bit about the "n" word that's kind of like that.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 02:10 AM
Jun 2013

About how by saying "the 'n' word" that's just white people getting away with saying nigger. And you've put the actual word in our head so "by saying "the 'n' word" you're making me say it in my head". (@ 6:13)


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
104. I have been trying to write something about that but not very good at it.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 10:10 AM
Jun 2013

Words are only symbols. They are not the meaning and in fact can have multiple meanings. What's more important is the meaning. But people think that substituting a different word somehow makes things ok. For example it's not socially acceptable to say Betty and John went on a date and fucked in the back seat of their car. You can say the "slept together" in the back seat. And the n-word is worthy of a dissertation. How liberals think they are accounting for their "white guilt". But it's a giant cop-out.

I need to express more about this but I am not good at it. We liberals should be able to use words if they are not being used in a pejorative manner.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
10. Zimmerman
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:14 AM
Jun 2013

Chuck Todd jumped in................

I wish he would jump somewhere.

Watching MSM is like watching an ass kissing contest.

They repeat the news word for word.

Scripted and censored to perfection.

P.S. The U.S. needs to get over people using the word FUCK !!!!

P.S.S. I truly appreciate the handful of journalists that go above and beyond.

They are to be admired.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
14. It should not be censored.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:31 AM
Jun 2013

Sometimes the truth is unpleaseant to hear, but it needs to be heard EXACTLY as it happened. "Fucking punks", said by Z, goes to establish his mindset. He had judged Martin as guilty BEFORE the confrontation. Z was agressive with a confrontational mindset.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
17. An I the only one that finds censored language and bleeping extremely stupid?
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:47 AM
Jun 2013

Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck

I also find this odd in a society where it's okay to simulate blowing peoples' brains out on TV, not that that should be censored either.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
22. Am I crazy or did Zimmerman's lawyer just open his defense with a knock knock joke?
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jun 2013

Not just a knock knock joke but a knock knock joke which insinuated that the jury were the most uninformed and ignorant people on the face of the planet.

Somehow I think he should spent some of that big money he's been raising on a better lawyer.

 

grok

(550 posts)
23. west is just as wacky and emotional as Bernie
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:03 AM
Jun 2013

Hard to say if he is a net plus to the defence. Not that pretty either unlike the guy opening for the persecution.

However, he is very good at laying out the facts clearly. He was the guy instrumental in getting the prosecution's expert witnesses removed.

ET Awful

(24,753 posts)
79. And a lawyer that doesn't look like
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:55 PM
Jun 2013

Ser Illyn Payne



(sorry for the reference for those who have no idea who he is

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
24. "Knock, knock." "Who's there?" "George Zimmerman". "George Zimmerman who". "George Zimmerman,
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:10 AM
Jun 2013

the angry guy with the gun, the one who started this by calling an innocent kid with some Skittles a punk, and who stalked him, and killed him".


I can't imagine a defense attorney that opens with something that can hang in a juror's mind like that.

I can see where he, from his reasoned viewpoint, thinks that is going to be a good way to induce questioning in a juror's mind.

But if I were the prosecutor I would thank heaven for the gift, and when I do my closing statements it would end with reminding them of that joke, and giving them a punch line they could take into the deliberation with them.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
52. Don't forget the iced tea.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:53 PM
Jun 2013

Skittles alone wouldn't have caused Zimmerman to, er, defend himself.

jeanmarc

(1,685 posts)
25. Fucking useless
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:17 AM
Jun 2013

That's the words that often come to mind when watching Chuck Todd. I don't see a problem with the language, Chuck.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
51. there are a few lifestreams going and also HLN (cable) will be broadcasting with MANY
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:38 PM
Jun 2013

commercial interruptions. Like the trial might be over at 4:30 or 5 and HLN will not be done till 9- 9:30, LOL, because they pause every 10 minutes for commercials.
Wild about Trial is usually pretty good for streaming.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
58. It's the Nancy Grace/ Dr Drew station. They drag the trials out all day long, so that they just
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jun 2013

show the last hour or so little clip after little clip during their prime time shows. But if you catch Dr Drew, or that Vinnie Pollan at 10, by then they will have the highlights/ wrap up too. Right now HLN is probably 1 1 1/2 hours behind the live stream.
Yes, I got sucked in and watched half of the Arias trial. And wish every trial had juror questions now.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
75. I turned it on--boy, they do hit that PAUSE button often enough!
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 03:06 PM
Jun 2013

I have to say, the defense attorney is not winning me over. He's coming off as smarmy, and I don't buy his "You are getting sleeeeeeeeeeepy...." voice. I hear tension behind that 'fake calm' 'tude he's trying to project.

I didn't see the prosecutor's bit, but damn--my nervous terrier with the irritating bark could do a better job than the defense is doing right now...!

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
81. you will get to know the commercials by heart on HLN... Are you suffering from mesothelioma?
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 07:08 PM
Jun 2013

Pocket hose anyone? Yeah, they just are ending for the day now on HLN, so it's a little more than 2 hours behind.
SO JVM is doing a recap now. Se is annoying, but I missed most of it. The prosecutions opening statement was from the Assistant- and everyone's saying it's because he is very good looking and it's an all woman jury. He was very good- the opening with that bit about "fucking punks" was brilliant, and he delivered it very well.

PennsylvaniaMatt

(966 posts)
27. Either the defense attorney is really dumb or really nervous....
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:19 AM
Jun 2013

As a prospective prosecutor, this opening statement is horrendous.

A knock knock joke? That was offensive to the jury and insensitive to everyone else...He is making a mockery of the legal system

reflection

(6,286 posts)
31. That movie was on yesterday.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:34 AM
Jun 2013

I had forgotten how good it was. Tomei's Academy Award was well-deserved. Fred Gwynn was excellent also.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
62. George joked about wearing a hoodie, so apparently there's a feeling that if they can make light
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jun 2013

of the whole thing, other people won't take it seriously. Sick people.
I hope West fucked his client good with that joke, because it could have come out of GZ's mouth. Fuck the both of them.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
94. Maybe he's pushing for a mistrial, or a new jury, a change of lawyers...
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 02:44 AM
Jun 2013

just to slow things down, get another year or two postponement because his client is cooked.. or maybe he's just not a capable attorney.

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
33. You know the defense is doing a bad opening statement when
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:39 AM
Jun 2013

the defenses attorney says "another thing I forgot to say". Did he even think his opening statement through? Pretty bad job he is doing.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
37. Pretty clever by the prosecuter.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:58 AM
Jun 2013

The judge barred the prosecution from using the words "vigilante, profiling, and cop wanna-be". So, in using Zimmerman's own words, part of evidence on tape, he created in the jury's minds the exact image of a vigilante cop wanna-be who was profiling a black teen walking home at night.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
41. This is my
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:11 PM
Jun 2013

entire argument to say Zimmerman is guilty. Someone is going to use those hostile words, and all of a sudden his defense on what happened, was that he was scared of the victim? There is no evidence to say Zimmerman was afraid of Martin until after he claims he killed him. His whole confrontation with Martin, including with initial contact showed hostility towards the victim. Then you add his past history of violence, doesn't show Zinmmerman was afraid of violent encounters. Just observe his facial attitude in Court. He shows no remorse of killing anyone. He will do it again if they let him get off.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
43. I agree he's guilty as fuck.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:20 PM
Jun 2013

I don't know how much of his past history of violence is ruled as admissible evidence, though. Perhaps Judge can use it in sentencing phase. Of course speculation of potential future violence won't be admissible, unless part of a court-ordered psychiatric exam report.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
56. The Zimmster had guilt all over his face when he heard his own words
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jun 2013

RepubliPunk can't stand the smell of his own scat.

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
73. No, the judge will allow those words....
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/21/194605/zimmerman-prosecutors-can-use.html#.UciU5Bgo75o

"Zimmerman prosecutors can use terms `profiling' and `vigilante,' judge rules"

SANFORD, Fla. — The terms "profiling," "wannabe cop" and "vigilante" will be permitted in opening statements Monday by prosecutors in the George Zimmerman trial, a judge ruled Friday.

Seminole Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson, however, warned prosecutors to stay away from the more specific term "racial profiling."

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/21/194605/zimmerman-prosecutors-can-use.html#.UciU5Bgo75o#storylink=cpy

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
39. Are They Really Doing What I Think They Are Doing
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:03 PM
Jun 2013

It seems to me that the George Zimmerman Defense is trying to blame the dispatcher for Zimmerman getting out of his vehicle. At one point in the opening statement the defense lawyer said the dispatcher asked Zimmerman which way Trayvon Martin was running, but Zimmerman could not drive his vehicle in the area where Martin was running, so Zimmerman had to get out of his vehicle. The defense lawyer keeps stating that the dispatcher was asking Zimmerman where Martin was going. It seems the defense is trying to say that if the dispatcher had not been asking Zimmerman where Martin was going Zimmerman would not have gotten out of his vehicle.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
53. That is still so awful to me.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 12:58 PM
Jun 2013

It's one thing to know it happens in this country, but this was so obvious and egregious. To not even examine what had happened but just let this guy exterminate a young man's life. No matter how this trial goes, at least Zimmerman didn't just get to saunter the fuck off.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
65. What's even worse is the way the cops treated the parents....
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:29 PM
Jun 2013

They showed them a picture of their dead son the way someone would ask, "Is this your dead cat?"

The entire attitude of the cops was that this wasn't that big a deal. You know DAMN well it wouldn't be that way if it had been a young white woman chased down and shot in the heart at close range.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
71. Totally agree with all of that.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jun 2013

That's one of the many reasons Zimmerman's defenders piss me off.

No consideration for the shitty way this was all handled in the first place, the lack of sensitivity for Trayvon's family, and the total lack of acknowledgement of the double standard for a young black male being shot by some random creep when parallel cases with white people get wall to wall coverage/investigation.

Innocent people don't stalk and hunt down humans right on the fucking street. Bottom line.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
72. You hit on it right there. The attitude is that Trayvon wasn't really human...
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 02:39 PM
Jun 2013

During the Civil Rights marches the signs read "I AM A MAN" because the racists considered black people to be WORSE than animals. That kind of attitude is still operating in many minds.

Ka hrnt

(308 posts)
54. I think the prosecution has an impossible task...
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

I worry some people here are setting themselves up for a huge letdown. This NYT article summed it up in the last sentence:

"In part because there were no witnesses and Mr. Zimmerman’s injuries support his account, the prosecutors face a much higher legal hurdle than defense lawyers do."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/us/zimmerman-trial.html?_r=0

And they already start with the very high hurdle of "reasonable doubt". Witnesses are nearly useless and the physical evidence jibes with Mr. Zimmerman's story. Unless the prosecution has something big up its sleeve, I don't see how they can possibly get a conviction.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
60. Zimmerman stalked and killed an unarmed teenager who was MINDING HIS OWN BUSINESS
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:22 PM
Jun 2013

WTF is there to really understand???

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
63. So standing your ground (BS) with a gun
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jun 2013

is legal, but fighting for your life with your fists is not?

Really?!

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
64. isn't it something?
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jun 2013

Trayvon was "standing his ground" and he was killed by a vigilante gun humper

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
74. That pretty much sums it up.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 02:55 PM
Jun 2013

I'm not saying I expect an outcome either way, but justice would be to hold Zimmerman accountable for his actions.

Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
101. A citizen volunteer who only cared about his community was attacked by a drug using teenager
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 07:17 AM
Jun 2013

That's the defense. So it's not so clear how this case will turn out. I think there's a 50% chance of conviction. Zimmerman could be seen as a sympathetic figure by a jury. He could be seen as a simple minded guy who cared about his neighbors and ended up in the wrong place at the wrong time. It wouldn't surprise me that if he comes out not guilty for "murder" that people will say he was overcharged. So this thing isn't so simple.

I'm with the prosecution an am hoping for a conviction, but it's no guarantee.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
103. he clearly stalked Trayvon
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 08:27 AM
Jun 2013

I seriously doubt if Trayvon had been ANYTHING other than a black male teenager this would be considered "not that simple"

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
66. the physical evidence was very minor (5/8") scratches- no broken nose, no head smashed on concrete
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jun 2013

and a story where he follows someone on purpose- then "accidentally" following to retrieve an address not requested where he wasn't located and didn't intend to stay- to answer the dispatcher where he was? The dispatcher told him not to go after him, and he did- now he blames the dispatcher, LOL.

Captain Stern

(2,201 posts)
68. That's pretty much how I see it too
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:42 PM
Jun 2013

Unfortunately, the only person left alive that knows what really happened that night is Zimmerman.

As long as his story about what happened after he encountered Martin isn't directly contradicted by the physical evidence, he'll be acquitted.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
76. Mr. Zimmerman’s injuries support his account?????
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jun 2013

No they don't. He didn't have ANY damage to his skull. I hope he doesn't walk. After seeing OJ and Casey Anthony walk, some people are fooled by defense attorneys.

tblue37

(65,383 posts)
107. But Z's OWN words are self-contradictory in many ways, so
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 04:12 PM
Jun 2013
his description of events could convict him.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
69. WTFuck? Fucking people actually fucking heard the fucking f* word on their fucking tvs? Aw fuck.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 01:46 PM
Jun 2013

They need to hear the thing in its entirety and I am sorry if anyone got so fucking overwhelmed or fucking anxious or are going to have difficulties explaining to their kids what the big fucking deal is with the f* word. It is HOW it is used, in my fucking opinion.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
77. Perhaps More Importantly
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 04:19 PM
Jun 2013

The prosecutor reminded the jury that Martin's hands had no blood on them. Not Zimmerman's and not Martin's. Neither were Martin's hands bruised. That is the physical evidence and not some theory. But I have a theory. Martin had a cell in one hand and the bag with iced tea and skittles in the other. When Martin asked Zimmerman "why are you following me" Zimmerman's answer was unsatisfactory and Martin hit Zimmerman in the face with the bag he was carrying. No bruises and no DNA on Martin's hands. That likely snapped Zimmerman's head back so when he hit the ground his crown could have hit the edge of the sidewalk and inflicted the head wounds. At that point more words were exchanged, prompting the neighbor to call 911, and Zimmerman pulled out his gun and shot Zimmerman as Martin pleaded for his life. That lines up with the physical evidence though it doesn't establish it as a fact. The defense is claiming that the police forensic team washed Martin's hands before checking them for blood. That sounds desperate and certainly does not match up with the physical evidence. Day 1, advantage prosecution.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
89. This part is
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:29 AM
Jun 2013

a mystery? If the evidence does not support Trayvon was the person gave Zimmerman the injuries, then who, how, and when did they occur? Did anybody see Zimmerman before the fight?

When did Zimmerman load his gun and put it in the firing position? What type of gun was this, not to have different firing positions? So he had a loaded gun at his side in the firing position?

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
92. I Answered The Injury Question
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 02:09 AM
Jun 2013

In theory, his head was snapped back from the blow that caused the bloody nose and his head hit the edge of the sidewalk in that position as he went down.

A round was in the chamber as Zimmerman was riding around in his vehicle. I have heard nothing about whether the safety was on or not but I kind of doubt that it was on. Don't know the brand offhand but it was a semi-automatic pistol. The fact that he fired only 1 shot indicated he knew Martin was hit hard and it wasn't going to take more rounds to bring him down.

We also know there was loud shouting that prompted a neighbor to call 911 but the shouting apparently subsided as the neighbor responded to the dispatcher then suddenly this high pitched scream that the neighbor thought was "help", a very short pause and another scream that ends instantly when the shot is heard. That would happen if the person shot was the person screaming. It could coincidently happen that the shooter stopped screaming at the sound of a shot but is a much, much lower possibility since the duration of the sound of the shot is probably only about 1/8 of a second.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
88. Networks on cable don't have to pay a fine. They're not
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 08:43 PM
Jun 2013

governed by the FCC the way the over the over the air networks are. It's purely up to them, I suppose they are worried about offending viewers and more importantly (to them) sponsors and losing those dollars.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
87. Todd should've watched the Daytime TV Awards on CNN a couple weeks ago Corbin Bernsen
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jun 2013

said both fuck and shit!

progree

(10,908 posts)
90. The knock knock "joke" text and video
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 01:01 AM
Jun 2013

George Zimmerman’s defense attorney kicked off the first day of trial in the high-profile case with a knock-nock joke. Don West admitted that his approach was a “bit weird” in the context of the death of Trayvon Martin, but told jurors in his opening statement that they are the “perfect audience” for the bit:

[font color = blue]WEST: Let me say, I would like to tell you a little joke. I know how that may sound a bit weird in this context under these circumstances. But I think you’re the perfect audience for it. As long as you don’t — if you don’t like it or don’t think it’s funny or inappropriate that you don’t hold it against Mr. Zimmerman. Hold it against me if you want, but not Mr. Zimmerman. I have your assurance you won’t.

Here’s how it goes: Knock knock. Who’s there? George Zimmerman. George Zimmerman who? All right. Good. You’re on the Jury.

(the courtroom was dead silent, not even any changes of facial expression at first -Progree)

Nothing? That’s funny. After what you folks have been through the last two or three weeks.[/font]

Watch it:



MORE: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/06/24/2202081/george-zimmermans-lawyer-opens-trial-with-a-knock-knock-joe/

progree

(10,908 posts)
91. Knock Knock... Who's there? Your career... My career who? Exactly...
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 01:47 AM
Jun 2013

(Comment courtesy of Facebook's Little Daryl https://www.facebook.com/phatboy2012
-- he got 1060 likes so far)

Blue_Roses

(12,894 posts)
105. LOL...did you see the face the prosecutor made?
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jun 2013

Now that was funny. I'm talking about the one with the mustache. His expression as he looks toward the cute is,"WTF is this"? The cute one looks like he wants to laugh at the absurdity of the joke.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zimmerman Prosecution Ope...