Court oversight of NSA phone surveillance is a joke
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/06/warrantless_searches_the_court_oversight_of_nsa_phone_surveillance_is_a.html?wpisrc=most_viral
The National Security Agency has been collecting the phone records of all U.S. citizenswhich numbers have called which other numbers, when, and for how longin an enormous database. The government says this mass collection is OK because the database is queriedi.e., searchedonly under court supervision. In theory, this two-tiered approach, with judicial scrutiny applied at the query stage rather than the collection stage, is defensible. But does the judiciaryin this case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courtreally examine the database queries?
This week, at House and Senate hearings, five administration officials answered questions about the phone surveillance program. They held back plenty, but they told us a lot more than we had previously known. They testified that last year, the NSA had plugged fewer than 300 phone numbers into the database numbers for which the agency could claim a reasonable, articulable suspicion of a connection to terrorismto find out which other phones had called or received calls from those numbers. The officials cited multiple layers of supervision. But the judicial review they described is superficial. The NSA doesnt have to get court approval each time it queries the database. It doesnt even have to explain each query to the court afterward.