Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:23 PM Jun 2013

A Gun Study I Would Like To See Done.

Gun studies seem to be mostly made by one side or the other and are seriously flawed in that they begin with the agenda they want to push (both sides) and procede with horrible science to to promote the agenda. There is a fairly simple study that could be quickly done and would provide a lot of illumination on the subject of CCWs. There are now dozens of states that have had "shall -issue" CCW laws for several years and longer. There are about 12 million people in the county with CCWs.

I propose that the study randomly select 50,000 people who have had their CCW for over five years. That should provide a good sized database. Although random they should be from states that have very similar shall-issue CCW requirements. Usually the requirements are one day of class that covers self-defense law, and conflict de-escalation, requires an FBI background check, fingerprinting and photographing, and a handgun proficiency test.

Look at their police records for the five years following getting their CCWs. How many were involved in a shooting, was it a justifiable shooting or were they charged. How many convicted of any crimes? How many accidents? How many reported to police a defensive gun use? How many were shot themselves?

Since records are computerized it should be an easy study to do. The results would go a long way towards settling a lot of arguments about guns in public.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
1. While a great idea,
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jun 2013

what you are proposing would be to gather data from multiple, disconnected data sources; nothing easy about this.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
2. You do realise that no matter how it is done, or who does it
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:35 PM
Jun 2013

It will still be referred as a "NRA Talking Point". and thus discounted.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Why don't you suggest NRA lobby Congress to study that,
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jun 2013

rather than opposing gun studies.

Also, select 50000 non-gun carrying people - who qualify for a permit to tote in public, but have better sense to do so - and see how they compare.

Then, study what happens to kids who grow up in gun culture. Start with son of NRA President Keene who served time for shooting in a road rage incident.

Then, track what happens to guns legally purchased over several decades.

Finally, see how many of gun toters in sample are bigots.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
5. If the NRA is connetcted in any way you will discount the study.
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:50 PM
Jun 2013

50K qualifed by not carrying citizens would be a bit hard to find, but it isn't a bad idea. They would need to be in the same states as the CCW folks, and in the same number.

Kids raised in gun culture grow up just fine. They will be a mix of good and bad apples, just like other kids.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
6. I grew up in the firearms culture
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:04 PM
Jun 2013

as did all my brothers and sisters, as did all my kids, we all turned out to be law abiding citizens who contributed to society as did 99% of all kids who grew up in the firearms culture.

And while we're at it, did you ever find a post of mine where I defended Zman? If not, are you going to delete the lie you posted in another thread?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3041681

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. Zimmerman said he was law-abiding right before he grabbed his gun an shot unarmed kid.
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:54 PM
Jun 2013

So did Loughner, Stawicki, Holmes,. . . . . .

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
12. Wow Hoyt, you just named 4
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:02 PM
Jun 2013

out of 100's of millions of kids that grew up in the firearms culture, and you don't even know if 3 of those grew up around firearms.

Found that link yet? If not, are you going to do the honorable thing and delete that lie? I know if I made a false allegation against another member and was corrected, I would apologize and delete the offending post.
Are you going to do so?

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
11. I did too and I couldn't get out of Texas fast enough. Hated that "culture" if that is what
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:00 PM
Jun 2013

you like to call it (I don't).

You are welcome to it.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
13. To each their own,
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:06 PM
Jun 2013

I respect your choice, it obviously wasn't what you wanted and I'm glad you found peace where you live now.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
14. The problem is that gun cultists tend to be bullies, bigots, and right wingers
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:24 PM
Jun 2013

willing to use their guns to get their way. But, they get nervous when their crutch ain't close by. A few exceptions maybe, but not many.

That's why gun marketeers go for the "man card" type campaigns.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
15. Blah, blah, blah.
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:28 PM
Jun 2013

I think it's pretty obvious that you haven't found any post where I've defended Zimmerman, care to do the honorable deed and apologize to me and delete your lie?

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
4. And publish their names and addresses.
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:47 PM
Jun 2013

Just for the sake of transparency.

This would just be another waste of time and money, and prove exactly nothing.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
7. This is a great idea,
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:08 PM
Jun 2013

and should be done by a non partisan group. This would help in the ongoing debate about CC.

BainsBane

(53,038 posts)
16. Well, perhaps you should do something about your friends at the NRA
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jun 2013

who have worked to keep the federal government from funding research on guns, and have criminalized doctors efforts to document anything about guns. That does put a damper on things.

Then there is the fact that the NRA has lobbied to prohibit computer analysis of records of guns.

They badly want to keep research from being done because favorable reception of their propaganda depends on ignorance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Gun Study I Would Like ...