Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsglobal power project part 1: exposing the transnational capitalist class
http://www.nationofchange.org/global-power-project-part-1-exposing-transnational-capitalist-class-1371217943Many now know the rhetoric of the 1% very well: the imagery of a small elite owning most of the wealth while the 99% take the table scraps. This rhetoric and imagery was made popular by the growth of the Occupy movement, so it seems appropriate that a project of Occupy.com should expand on this understanding and bring the activities of the global elite further to light.
In 2006, a UN report revealed that the worlds richest 1% own 40% of the worlds wealth, with those in the financial and internet sectors comprising the super rich. More than a third of the worlds super-rich live in the U.S., with roughly 27% in Japan, 6% in the U.K., and 5% in France. The worlds richest 10% accounted for roughly 85% of the planet's total assets, while the bottom half of the population more than 3 billion people owned less than 1% of the worlds wealth.
Looking specifically at the United States, the top 1% own more than 36% of the national wealth and more than the combined wealth of the bottom 95%. Almost all of the wealth gains over the previous decade went to the top 1%. In the mid-1970s, the top 1% earned 8% of all national income; this number rose to 21% by 2010. At the highest sliver at the top, the 400 wealthiest individuals in America have more wealth than the bottom 150 million.
A 2005 report from Citigroup coined the term plutonomy to describe countries where economic growth is powered by and largely consumed by the wealthy few. The report specifically identified the U.K., Canada, Australia and the United States as four plutonomies. Published three years before the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, the Citigroup report stated: Asset booms, a rising profit share and favorable treatment by market-friendly governments have allowed the rich to prosper and become a greater share of the economy in the plutonomy countries.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 645 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
global power project part 1: exposing the transnational capitalist class (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2013
OP
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)2. True economic growth is only powered by work, money by itself does nothing
So the definition of plutonomy isn't right from the get go, where economic growth is powered by and largely consumed by the wealthy few. because economic growth isn't powered by the few even though they largely consume it.