General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre women non-monogamous?
Last edited Fri Jun 14, 2013, 12:19 AM - Edit history (2)
Another member raised a behavioral question, and I'd like DUers to weigh in on the subject. Are straight women under 35 inherently unfaithful? Do they by their very nature hate monogamy? And are they more likely to cheat on their spouses than men are. Please note the idea prompting this poll does not reflect my own views.
18 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, 95% women under 35 will cheat with the right guy | |
3 (17%) |
|
All women, even those over 35, cheat | |
0 (0%) |
|
95% of men under 35 will cheat with the right woman | |
0 (0%) |
|
All men, even those over 35, cheat | |
1 (6%) |
|
Men are somewhat more likely to cheat. | |
1 (6%) |
|
Women are somewhat more likely to cheat. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Some people cheat, some don\'t. Some even have open partnerships | |
13 (72%) |
|
I\'m gay and you straight people are seriously fucked up. | |
0 (0%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
mokawanis
(4,452 posts)I think it comes down to individual personalities more than it does gender. It's been my observation that among friends, acquaintances, and co-workers the numbers run about even.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
But then this whole poll is going to be a Duzy. I can see it coming.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)No...you know.... I don't know
EOTE
(13,409 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I think that there is quite a bit of evidence that suggests that serial monogamy is a fairly common practice among humans.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)but the poll was prompted by a conversation with someone who insisted answer 1 was true and that therefore women were "disgusting."
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)The misogyny that appears here needs to be challenged consistently. Thanks for posting.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)"in my experience, 95% of women under 35 will cheat with the right guy"
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I also would like to see you respond to this post http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3012597
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And 95 of them have dumped you for someone else?
Given that you're someone who insists 95% of women chat, I can't imagine how you would arrive at this experience.
What happened to the other five? Did you cheat on them?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)"He's had many, many women. . . "
He's quick to point out the inclusion of cheating "for the right guy." We're supposed to believe he's that "right guy." (Editorial comment withheld).
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)But not much surprises me here anymore
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)about your claim that 95% cheat with "the right guy" and that their behavior is "disgusting." Oh, wait. You didn't. You ran away.
If women's cheating is "disgusting," what does that say about the man who "had them."
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Yet you lack the strength of character to admit you were wrong. No stalking necessary. It's my thread.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I thought you'd like to see what has happened to 400 or so women under age 35 in recent years. The killers evidently shared your view that these young women's behavior was "disgusting."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3021983
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)so everyone can see how emotions can twist words and opinion into culpability without influence.
statements like this prove my position, not counter them.
this is a wild encounter, glad its only internet based.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)isn't at all emotional.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)you can't make it what it isn't, in spite of your assertions.
i like to think that progressives deal in fact, but i understand some folks need to get it twisted in order to get attention.
i don't believe in what you believe because my worldview is just different. you should go bark up another tree for a reaction because in my view, your beliefs re: gender aren't helping and are only hurting the dialogue.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I remember very well. You've "had many, many women" who cheated on their husbands with you, supposedly because you're the "right guy." You consider their behavior disgusting.
There is zero evidence women cheat more than men. Surveys I've seen have said the opposite, but that may very well have changed in recent years. You are the one condemning women based on how you perceive their gender. I am commenting on YOU and YOUR WORDS alone.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Have 95% of your girlfriends cheated on you, or do you consider yourself to have been several womens' "right guy"?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)i seem to have attracted a following.
(best Paris Hilton voice) that's hot.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Please don't flatter yourself... you have no "following"... It's just your wildly misogynist statements which attract attention.
If you think that's something to be proud of... that's on you.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)it seems to get used quite a bit when folks are losing an argument, but we agree on one thing...I am wild!
glad i could give you a happy, laugh filled afternoon!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nt
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I guess we'll find out. The original statement prompting the poll was so ludicrous, I couldn't resist the chance to try to disprove it.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)you might want to explain a little better in your OP. I kinda figured there was more to it because I know you wouldn't be trying to make a sexist statement with this. nevertheless, I predict a category 5 shit storm. maybe not directed at you, but I feel one of some sort coming on.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Unfortunately it didn't allow me the space to do so. Here is the earlier exchange.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3011421
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)I would go even farther and point out that gender is not binary
Binary categorization and characterization is worse than useless
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)don't go apeshit on me, that is just my opinion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Violence is probably more likely due to testosterone etc.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)I read somewhere - I'm not going to go looking for it. But I read somewhere that cases of domestic violence are proportional to the number of men in the relationship - highest among gay men and lowest among lesbians, with straight couples somewhere in the middle. that could be bullshit but I could see it.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)they simply have more PERMISSION to behave the way they do
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Isn't the point the behavior?
Skittles
(153,193 posts)for example, who knows how women would respond sexually if they weren't called sluts and whores
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)and it's safe to assume this is not among them.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Put it that way.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)to do things that gals get trashed - and KILLED for
treestar
(82,383 posts)It depends on the person.
It's strange how the lite media tries so hard to make rules about how women and men are. It's very controlling. People would read an article on "how to know if a man likes you" or "how to get women in bed" as if the opposite gender is monolithic and if the rules can just be learned, you can control it all.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Not sure where the opposite view came from
indie9197
(509 posts)N/T
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Women who want children usually try to do it before 40... Having a teenager when you are in your late 50's can be tiring..
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)was a matter of fact. I'm assuming that's because he only dates women under 35, but he would have to elaborate further.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)BainsBane
(53,066 posts)in number 1 might have.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)as a serial monogamist with, historically, a bit of overlap. I'm quite settled now, though.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I think that humans, generally, are probably "inherently non-monogamous" (insofar as we didn't evolve to be monogamous; it's a social and cultural norm). Statistics generally show that men are more likely than women to be unfaithful in a relationship, though.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)He wants others to be aware of the proper context of his inquiry, so I think he's okay with my linking to it.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)I don't like to make generalizations like that.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I was non-monogamous for years but I never cheated.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)but the original comment the person made assumed marriage was monogamous.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)streets are uneven, when you're down.
Most women are faithful. Most men are faithful, too.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)I did notice the "All men cheat," but there is no corresponding "All women cheat." Fascinating.
Of course, non-monogamy does not indicate cheating.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)It would be to me. I would not be comfortable in a non-monogamous sexual relationship. Any woman who entered into a relationship with me who wasn't monogamous... I would feel betrayed. But I'm just a simple mid-western fella.
Luckily I'm married and our relationship seems happily closed.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)A number of people carry on relationships with a variety of people, some which be sexual. If those involved know the relationships are not monogamous, then it isn't "cheating."
ETA: It doesn't mean you're not entitled to have a relationship of your choosing, anymore than others who might find what is termed "non-conventional" relationships, to be more to their liking.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)"All women, even those over 35, cheat more than men." is not the same as "All men cheat.". Nice try at obfuscation though.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)All women cheat. The second one saying all men cheat is shorter because the first preceded it. It's the same question. How would you know anyway? And why would you even care? The poll is meant to test someone's hypothesis that women are by nature "disgusting." I would think you'd approve.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)The first question says "All women cheat MORE THAN men." The qualifier is the act of being a "cheater." Saying "all men are cheaters." indicates an entire group, not a subset (cheaters), is being described, as opposed to asking about a groups actions. Your first question doesn't presume all women (or men, for that matter) are cheaters. Your second statement declares all men are cheaters. It is clearly NOT the same question.
Why do I care? For the same reason if you had asked if all Jews are cheaters; it is a disgusting overgeneralization.
"The poll is meant to test someone's hypothesis that women are by nature "disgusting." I would think you'd approve. " No, I do not approve or care for your meta reindeer games.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)You see the world through a very ugly lens. That must make for a very unhappy life.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)It seems you who views life through a very ugly perspective, and it is indicative by your absurd poll and pathetic assertions about my life.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)sinister motives to others are often projecting their own behavior. This poll was prompted by one of your comrades from the men's group. It's his assertion and his polling question, only since he's not a star member he can't create polls himself. It's quite obvious that the question is highly misogynistic, but naturally you fixate on a perceived insult to men. That takes some doing.
Now, since you pointed out the discrepancy, I change the poll. You could have just pointed that out without accusing me of plotting the next holocaust, the destruction of humanity, or whatever it was you think I'm doing.
Edited multiple times for appalling English.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Perhaps one of your "comrades" from the HOF will help you understand.
"Now, since you pointed out the discrepancy, I change the poll. You could have just pointed out what discrepancy without accusing me of plotting the next holocaust, the destruction of humanity, or whatever it was you think I'm doing. "
You have grossly overestimated yourself, or more properly, my opinion of you!
Four fingers.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)The questions you pose are not the same. I suggest you alter options 2 and 4 so they read the same. Presto, wizzo, poll changed without accusing others of acting in bad faith.
Oh yes, I realize I'm not special. I'm no different from any other woman.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)It is that passive-aggressive crap which is so dishonest. The change you made is fine now, though the age is redundant.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)but that was Galileoreloaded's contention. If I were to pick an age, it would not be 35.
I'm not passive aggressive. I'm quite direct, to a fault in fact. I'm just mindful of juries. An observation of sexism is not sexism. Nice try though.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Maybe what is happening is not "sexism" but "heterosexism." That is certainly my observation in this little exchange.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I tried to fit in an apology about that, but it wouldn't allow the space. That's why I added the last choice, which is my personal favorite. The fact is it was prompted by a conversation about what Galieleoreloaded sees as inherent differences between men and women in heterosexual relations. Here is the exchange. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3011421
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)See how that works?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)The point was not an assumption that gay people see themselves as superior. It was a joke about the absurdity of the bullshit in the poll.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)BainsBane
(53,066 posts)You aren't the only gay person responding. You just happen to be the person complaining. Yet after all that kibitzing about the poll, you don't even respond to it. So we come back to http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3013534
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Do you think all gay people have the same concerns?
ETA: Any reason you decided Yiddish was needed?
See how that works?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)You act like you think I don't know any gay people.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Is there ever a point at which you aren't angry?
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)That would be a more interesting response given your question.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)You need to look that term up, since you're using it inaccurately. My question was quite direct.
I'll take that as a no.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Of course, you have already reached a conclusion which fits your parameters. Are you claiming I am nothing more than an angry gay person?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)to clarify any misunderstanding. Are you always so hostile? I don't recall a single post of yours that hasn't been hostile.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Work on it.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)Do you enjoy manipulating your own stories in which you are the hero?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)of course not. It's entirely in my imagination. I really prefer not to waste energy on pointless confrontation. Toodles.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #85)
Behind the Aegis This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)So feel free to find something else to be outraged about.
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)"O Meta, where for art thou?!"
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)how could we know what women, or anyone else, are naturally inclined to be?
What we do know is that such studies as there are seem to show women in a relationship fool around slightly less than men but women not so entangled tend to fool around a bit more. The numbers are pretty close to half in all cases.
And then there's this...
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/05/23/nytimes_on_lybrido_women_get_bored_with_monogamy_faster_than_men.html
But, passing judgment, as someone did in that comment to you, is always a no-no.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)to assume behavior is natural, as in biologically determined, is a mistake.
flamingdem
(39,321 posts)Those were da dayz
Now it's too much effort
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)My "friend" who prompted this question would have harsh words for you. I'm not quite sure why 35 is the cut off. I recall a peak in sexual interest in my late 30s.
flamingdem
(39,321 posts)and not knowing what you want yet.
In fact in those defining years a choice might be made that takes one across the country to live.
Or helps one decide on a career or get a job.
It might help one break away from what the family wants in a partner for you.
Later on we know ourselves. Then it's more likely to happen due to boredom
whistler162
(11,155 posts)who cares if a man or a woman is for or against monograms. I think they are silly but heck some people mus ike little initials on their stuff!
PS: Do start listening to you Psychologist and take your meds!
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)This was the exchange that prompted the poll: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3011421
I think your advice is sound.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)To paraphrase, he says that females tend to seek out the more aggressive risk taking males for their mates, but then they gravitate to the nice guys with the more comfortable nests to actually raise the offspring.
flamingdem
(39,321 posts)like Big Bird?!
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)That's my personal favorite, but I couldn't honestly choose it.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)people.
Individual human beings with exactly the same range of wants, needs, desires, foibles, brilliance, misconceptions, filters, blind spots, perceptions, fantasies, appetites, fears, and hopes as the other half of this species of bald monkeys.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)And I agree with you completely.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)I should have guessed.
Well, I know it's no consolation (not that any is needed), but they are an embarrassment to my half of the species.
Keep up the good fight and don't let the bastards get you down. But also don't forget that in real life, they are just sad.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)When I think back, the people that cheated were about about half men and half women.
I never have. I don't think that makes me morally superior.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I guess that makes you only 5% woman, according to the hypothesis put forward by the muse of this poll.
duuser5822
(54 posts)Just my opinion, though.
FSogol
(45,526 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)BainsBane
(53,066 posts)I don't cheat, but I probably stand a decent chance of beating you anyway. What say you? Sadly, I've never played bridge.
rug
(82,333 posts)Lately I started playing three card poker at the Mohegan Sun casino in the Poconos. Do you play online and what kind of poker?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)Stud is my weakest in the HORSE line up. I used to play a fair bit online but now you can't deposit money at all. I'm meaning to get to a casino where I can play. I wish they'd stop outlawing poker. It's a game of skill.
rug
(82,333 posts)The skill there is counting the cards and reading the effect of each trick.
I don't play much poker but, while the play reveals some about the cards, reading the player seems more important than reading the play.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)I also think that most people would at least leave their current partner if they found the 'right' person elsewhere. Kind of a given, if they're really the 'right' person. Whether they'd actually cheat before doing so, I dunno. A lot probably would.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)cheated and i'm sure he didn't. that being said during our marriage there were times when i was attracted to other men and i'm sure he was attracted to other women. my sister had 2 husbands and cheated on both of them. if my husband had cheated i might have cheated too. what's good for the goose .......
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)And some people you KNOW will NEVER be monogamous. I knew a few lesbians who I knew I could never keep if we were to start a relationship with, so why try. So it's not just the straight people who are fucked up.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I am monogamous. I can't speak for any other women. I'm fine with whatever structure individuals choose for their relationships, whether it fits their inherent nature or not, as long as those relationships are with consenting adults, involve no imbalance of power, dishonesty, or cheating.
While my brain tells me that, biologically speaking, males are not wired to be monogamous, and females may be wired only for serial, not permanent, monogamy, I can't discount cultural and social norms, which are just as powerful in their own way, and developed out of perceived needs of one kind or another.
We may be able to generalize about "women" and "men," but we also know that people are individuals and don't always fit stereo-types or norms. That's okay.
There ARE a few animal species that are monogamous; more monogamous than we.
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)For example, men routinely report a higher number of partners than women. How is that possible, given that the number of men is roughly equal to the number of women? Of course is possible that there are a couple of incredibly sexually active women who just never get picked up in the surveys. But, I doubt it.
There may be other reasons, of course. Maybe that drunken Christmas office party shag on the photocopier with the nerdy guy doesn't count for the gorgeous blonde woman but it sure as hell does for the nerd. I can live with that.
I used to very pretty (I'm male - didn't realise that I was pretty at the time). I got lots of invites from married woman. Some of which I accepted. I also got lots of "expressions of interest", some of which I pursued. It is not my opinion that married women (as a group) are largely monogamous.
I know there are women (and men) who would never even consider infidelity. All strength to you.
I hold the same view for married men.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)by a completely offensive statement from another member (worst part of it is not communicated in this poll). I posted the poll in order to prove him wrong, which it has done.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)They're as different from each other as men are.
Why does this keep coming up? Junior high school's over, right?
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)This was the exchange that gave rise to the poll
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3011421
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Boys room must be full up today.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)They can say whatever they want, so juries claim. Imagine getting away with referring to 95% of any other group of people as "disgusting."
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)I can't count the number of times I went out after work and wound up the object of attention of a reasonably young married woman. At work, it also happened very often.
At work, all of the gossip was about who was doing whom, where and when (those last two were sometimes a lot more entertaining than the whom).
I've never actually cheated, but that's just me. The opportunities were everywhere. It was seriously shocking, really. And as for women always complaining how it's always men who mess up? I just had to laugh. First of all, the office gossip almost always involved married folks on both sides. Secondly, lots of the women who were making it abundantly clear to me that they were willing were both married and women that, far as I knew, everyone thought were beyond reproach. It takes a lot for me not to be totally cynical about this.
My wife? Trust her completely. Why do you ask?