General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Marshall: Curious
Josh Marshall
Im curious whether Greenwald/Guardian declined to publish Snowdens new claims about US hacking in Hong Kong and mainland China, which appeared in the South China Morning Post.
http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/06/curious.php
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/06/fresh-hacking-allegations-from-snowden-in-new-interview.php
(Snowden)...Showed Hong Kong Newspaper Documents Revealing US Hacking Attacks On China (updated 2x)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023001669
Greenwald: We Did Not Want To Just Go And Arbitrarily Disclose Things
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023003692
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)i'm no greenwald fan but even he isn't stupid/arrogant enough to have done that.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)he implied he was going to print some of it, don't know whether this was some of it or not. but I really give greenwald the benefit of the doubt that he wouldn't have published such info.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)As a debate raged over whether Snowden should be praised or prosecuted for his actions, he told the South China Morning Post: "I'm neither traitor nor hero. I'm an American."
Snowden claimed that the US had hacked hundreds of targets in Hong Kong including public officials, a university, businesses and students in the city and on the mainland. These were part of more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, he alleged.
"We hack network backbones like huge internet routers, basically that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one," he said.
The Post said it had seen a document that, Snowden alleged, supported his claims. The Post said it had not verified the document, and did not immediately publish it.
Snowden said he was releasing the information to demonstrate "the hypocrisy of the US government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries".
A senior Chinese official said last week he had "mountains of data" on cyber-attacks from the US, after Washington turned up the pressure over hacking by China.
....
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/12/edward-snowden-us-extradition-fight
Read it on the Guardian a few hours ago...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)BTW: I posted this Monday:
I'll leave the two of you alone now. I'm sure you have a lot to discuss.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2984787
My take on the whole affair is not the standard fare.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)that is not revealing it. once it is out there anyone can talk about it - with the exception of people who have sworn not to reveal -in which case it remains classified until declared otherwise.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Obama gets Snowden to crack the NSA and as he does, he goes to China and feeds the Chinese false info which gets China chasing their tail. All the while Obama is charming the Chinese leader.
Some chess, eh?
FSogol
(45,528 posts)Xi Jinping gets Obama to get Snowden to crack the NSA and as he does, he goes to China and feeds the Chinese false info which gets China chasing their tail and doulbe feeds the info back to the US. All the while Obama is charming the Chinese leader. Meanwhile, Dennis Rodman is sent securely to North Korea to double cross Obama and LeBron James drives into the lane completing a world-shattering slamdunk!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)FSogol
(45,528 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)FSogol
(45,528 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)FSogol
(45,528 posts)Already happened: check out, "The Catcher Was a Spy: The Mysterious Life of Moe Berg."
http://www.amazon.com/The-Catcher-Was-Spy-Mysterious/dp/0679762892
It would make a good movie.