Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCBS News: White House defends DNI director Clapper after congressional testimony draws fire
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57588778/wh-defends-dni-director-clapper-after-congressional-testimony-draws-fire/I believe this is called "doubling down".
The White House on Tuesday came to the defense of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, after a senator blasted the intelligence official for failing to give "straight answers" on the government surveillance of Americans.
President Obama "certainly believes that Director Clapper has been straight and direct in the answers he's given" Congress, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Tuesday, adding that Clapper has been "aggressive in providing as much information as possible to the American people, to the press."
We are getting into really bizarre territory. Clapper said something that is demonstrably false, we have it on video, and now Carney is still claiming that what he said was true? Note that Wyden gave Clapper prior notice that he was planning on asking that question, and asked Clapper later if he wanted to amend his answer. This was not a case of misspeaking or misunderstanding, as Dianne Feinstein has suggested.
They really don't think very much of us, do they?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1230 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CBS News: White House defends DNI director Clapper after congressional testimony draws fire (Original Post)
BlueCheese
Jun 2013
OP
Nope. We're just supposed to sit back and say the emperor's new clothes look great. n/t
Catherina
Jun 2013
#6
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)1. You want the White House to treat Clapper like Shirley Sherrod?
Clapper is no namby pamby liberal to be forced to resign via text message on the side of the road.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)4. +1000000000
Rex
(65,616 posts)2. Well we all know what they think of liberals.
Nuff said.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)3. Deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole we go
and where we stop, nobody knows.
dkf
(37,305 posts)5. Geez and they expect us to trust them? Orwell lives.
Black is white and all that...
Catherina
(35,568 posts)6. Nope. We're just supposed to sit back and say the emperor's new clothes look great. n/t
DCKit
(18,541 posts)7. "Dianne Feinstein has suggested." That we put more money in her sleazy pocket. nt
WillyT
(72,631 posts)8. K & R !!!
noise
(2,392 posts)9. One of the weird things is how some people
rush to defend politicians who continually lie to them.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)10. Clapper is another one of Bush's gang that Pres Obama appointed. nm