Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:38 PM Jun 2013

They Cried “Wolf” About Benghazi and the IRS. Why do you Believe Those F ***ers About the NSA?

Honestly, the rush to judgement is getting to be almost lemming-like. Since we know that the corporate media has it in for Obama, and they've been manufacturing bullshit scandals for years now to try and unseat him, you'd think that DUers at least would have learned not to believe the little boys after they've cried "Wolf" a few hundred times. But nooooooo.

http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/they-cried-wolf-about-benghazi-and-the-irs-so-why-do-you-believe-those-f-ers-about-the-nsa/

101 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They Cried “Wolf” About Benghazi and the IRS. Why do you Believe Those F ***ers About the NSA? (Original Post) riqster Jun 2013 OP
Because many don't know it comes from an Iraq war advocate and a winger. Media kinda uponit7771 Jun 2013 #1
Yeah, funny how those little details get left out. riqster Jun 2013 #3
I love your last line. :>) pangaia Jun 2013 #14
I saw it on a Grumpy Cat meme. riqster Jun 2013 #15
And its a big ass hole too madokie Jun 2013 #24
Your response got one out of me too. riqster Jun 2013 #25
I hate to admit it but I like weed eating madokie Jun 2013 #27
Back in the day, weed eating meant brownies riqster Jun 2013 #30
Oh yeah madokie Jun 2013 #49
who are you referring to? nt G_j Jun 2013 #4
Greenwald and a Carlyle Group company uponit7771 Jun 2013 #5
that's makes no sense G_j Jun 2013 #11
Technically a libertarian. Was promoting Darryl Issa's talking points on Benghazi not that long ago. emulatorloo Jun 2013 #13
I was replying to a different poster G_j Jun 2013 #16
Of course. emulatorloo Jun 2013 #18
Technically! A weasel word in this context. You have no evidence that he is one so you just Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #28
You are right, Darell Issa is a weasel emulatorloo Jun 2013 #52
He's not a Libertarian. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #51
OK emulatorloo Jun 2013 #58
Ahem--Greenwald had no problem wiretapping for Matt Hale-- msanthrope Jun 2013 #26
huh.... one_voice Jun 2013 #34
I think that's why he isn't a lawyer anymore. I'd love to interview msanthrope Jun 2013 #36
Oh, bullshit. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #53
Bullshit to your bullshit, now the guy is saying he didnt support the Iraq war uponit7771 Jun 2013 #56
Oh, please... Way to distort that guy's distortions. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #59
the GOP supports Obama on the NSA n/t Enrique Jun 2013 #2
...and the pusher of the story is a warmonger, either way this doesn't deserve the face uponit7771 Jun 2013 #7
Hillary Clinton also supported the Iraq war Fumesucker Jun 2013 #19
You don't know the definition of warmonger. Too bad. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #29
the GOP supports Obama on the NSA frylock Jun 2013 #47
Um, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh ring a bell? DevonRex Jun 2013 #84
peter king and lindsey graham aren't the "usual assholes?" frylock Jun 2013 #89
Greenwald is not a warmonger. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #55
Senator J. William Fulbright originally voted for the Tonkin Gulf Resolution Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #69
Um, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh ring a bell? DevonRex Jun 2013 #83
The republicans are the ones who started the NSA data collection liberal N proud Jun 2013 #6
+1, The leaker worked for a Carlyle Group company but many on DU want to t uponit7771 Jun 2013 #10
Still waiting for you to answer this LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #81
And a whole lot of DUers are playing chorus. riqster Jun 2013 #12
K & R. n/t FSogol Jun 2013 #8
I mostly agree. GoCubsGo Jun 2013 #9
Given that the media is owned by those who finance the Reeps, it seems riqster Jun 2013 #17
Here's a good article riqster Jun 2013 #21
Thanks. I'm not surprised... GoCubsGo Jun 2013 #23
"there’s a way to have this debate without selling out to misinformation" Hekate Jun 2013 #73
That is truly an epic word. nt riqster Jun 2013 #76
Just Benghazi and the IRS? Shew, try birth certificate, college records, weather tampering LaydeeBug Jun 2013 #20
Absolutely, let's discuss riqster Jun 2013 #22
The problem is that they've already let the cat out of the bag. LaydeeBug Jun 2013 #60
A cat, yes. riqster Jun 2013 #62
True. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2013 #77
BENGHAZI! BENGHAZI! BENGHAZI! Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #31
Because the 4th Amendment. Because $1 trillion per year is spent on the surveillance state. Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #32
And, keep in mind, we don't have all the details riqster Jun 2013 #33
^^^This. nt Skidmore Jun 2013 #37
Truth. And you've given me an idea for an OP, because the surveillance state HAS been proven to be Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #40
Hellz Yeah. riqster Jun 2013 #44
Some bits: Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #61
In the case at hand, it's about the NSA using warrants to obtain info from tech companies. So wtf KittyWampus Jun 2013 #39
What I'm talking about are the exaggerations in the "reporting" riqster Jun 2013 #71
This has been going on for a long time............ wandy Jun 2013 #35
That seems likely to me, too riqster Jun 2013 #38
And although I will NOT secumb to the republican illness of blind following.......... wandy Jun 2013 #43
Damn Straight wandy. riqster Jun 2013 #45
Rove is patting Jebbie on the back and assuring him Skidmore Jun 2013 #41
For some Democrats, it's cool to bash Obama loyalsister Jun 2013 #63
When I listened to the Interview...it didnt sound credible.......i knew we were being monitored Gin Jun 2013 #42
The problem with such failures riqster Jun 2013 #46
lindsey graham, peter king, and many GOPers (like many DUers) are all cools with this.. frylock Jun 2013 #48
Enough reason for me to be against it. alarimer Jun 2013 #66
There is a republican behind every one of these fake "scandals". bushisanidiot Jun 2013 #50
Even Al Gore is fooled. How inconvenient.... think Jun 2013 #54
Because this isn't the same thing? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #57
Educate yourself. 99Forever Jun 2013 #64
Thank you!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #65
As I have been wathcing this scandal and the others.. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #67
+1. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #68
^^^This^^^ riqster Jun 2013 #70
^^^yes, indeedy^^^ Hekate Jun 2013 #74
Regarding your last sentence... DevonRex Jun 2013 #91
Well, because, you know, Obama failed to give us our... Hekate Jun 2013 #72
+1 Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #75
Different fuckers. It isn't all a grand conspiracy. morningfog Jun 2013 #78
As the Rude Pundit says riqster Jun 2013 #98
Who are these Republicans that are going after the President on the NSA? neverforget Jun 2013 #79
Um, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh ring a bell? nt DevonRex Jun 2013 #87
how did rush limbaugh vote on USAPATRIOT? frylock Jun 2013 #90
Does McCain, Graham, Boehner, Cantor, McConnell ring a bell? neverforget Jun 2013 #93
Because Bluffdale is not a lie davidn3600 Jun 2013 #80
Was the IRS targeting deal disproven or something? Skip Intro Jun 2013 #82
Yes. Nt DevonRex Jun 2013 #85
so why did Obama apologize for it so quickly? burnodo Jun 2013 #94
What is phoney libodem Jun 2013 #86
I don't suppose you remember how that story ended, do you? Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #88
Of course riqster Jun 2013 #95
And what does it matter from inside the wolf's stomach? Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #96
There is another option riqster Jun 2013 #100
"the corporate media has it in for Obama" = since when? HiPointDem Jun 2013 #92
Because of the Patriot Act lame54 Jun 2013 #97
So you believe the liars because of the Patriot Act? riqster Jun 2013 #101
GOD BLESS THE NSA!!!! sibelian Jun 2013 #99

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
1. Because many don't know it comes from an Iraq war advocate and a winger. Media kinda
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jun 2013

...kept that one under wraps

riqster

(13,986 posts)
3. Yeah, funny how those little details get left out.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:46 PM
Jun 2013

Frankly, after listening to Snowden explain why he fled to Hong Kong, I have my doubts about him. For the love of God, he actually said that the people of Hong Kong, having a strong tradition of free speech, would stop the Chinese government from extraditing him.

He may not have lost all of his marbles, but there is definitely a hole in the bag.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
24. And its a big ass hole too
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jun 2013

that got a laugh out of me and gave me the energy to finish my weedeating.
fuck a wild man LOL

madokie

(51,076 posts)
27. I hate to admit it but I like weed eating
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:24 PM
Jun 2013

helps to keep my old bod in shape, plus I get to play with my stihl weed eater toy

madokie

(51,076 posts)
49. Oh yeah
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:37 PM
Jun 2013

I liked that too
Had some a while back, 6 months or so,) made with some killer and was it ever good.

emulatorloo

(44,186 posts)
13. Technically a libertarian. Was promoting Darryl Issa's talking points on Benghazi not that long ago.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:52 PM
Jun 2013

In general, I don't find Greenwald all that credible. Promoting the Benghazi nonsense pretty much was the last nail in the coffin.

That's my opinion, I am entitled to it.

Before you call me a racist-apologist-enemy-of-the-constitution, this is pretty much where I am at:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022983101

Serious story, serious issue.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
28. Technically! A weasel word in this context. You have no evidence that he is one so you just
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:25 PM
Jun 2013

throw it out there and hope it sticks.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
36. I think that's why he isn't a lawyer anymore. I'd love to interview
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:47 PM
Jun 2013

Patrick Fitzgerald about the Matt Hale/SAMs issue.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
53. Oh, bullshit.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:42 PM
Jun 2013

He caught on pretty fast and turned into one of the staunchest anti-Iraq, anti-Bush critics.

It wasn't kept under wraps. Greenwald has written about it often.

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
7. ...and the pusher of the story is a warmonger, either way this doesn't deserve the face
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:48 PM
Jun 2013

...value that it has gotten on DU

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
19. Hillary Clinton also supported the Iraq war
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jun 2013

Unlike Greenwald though she has never backed down from that support.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
89. peter king and lindsey graham aren't the "usual assholes?"
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:49 PM
Jun 2013

rand paul and ted cruz are fucking n00bs, much like the very vocal group of DUers that support this shit who signed up in 2007 and 2008.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
55. Greenwald is not a warmonger.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:46 PM
Jun 2013

Lots of Dems supported the Iraq War and DIDN'T become staunch critics of it.

"Hey, everybody! Glenn Greenwald trusted President Bush on Iraq!"

"Yeah, you want to know who I found that out from? Glenn Greenwald. When writing about how he became one of our biggest critics of Bush and WAR."

This is getting old.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
69. Senator J. William Fulbright originally voted for the Tonkin Gulf Resolution
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:44 PM
Jun 2013

Two years later, he wrote "The Arrogance of Power" in which he became one of the biggest critics of the Vietnam War.

People can and do change their minds about supporting a war.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
83. Um, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh ring a bell?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:35 PM
Jun 2013

They do NOT support Obama on this. The ones that do, vocally, happen to be on the committees which have oversight - just like the Democrats who support Obama and the programs, like All Franken.

liberal N proud

(60,346 posts)
6. The republicans are the ones who started the NSA data collection
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:47 PM
Jun 2013

And now they are the ones trying to fry Obama for it.

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
10. +1, The leaker worked for a Carlyle Group company but many on DU want to t
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jun 2013

...take what he and his warmonger hommie at face value

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
81. Still waiting for you to answer this
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

Tell me, since Carlyle is being paid what I can only presume are lavish sums of money to carry out the operations, explain to me how it is in their self-interest to leak information about the secret program which is generating them this money?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
12. And a whole lot of DUers are playing chorus.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jun 2013

Even though it's obviously just another "Wolf" incident.

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)
9. I mostly agree.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jun 2013

But, it's not the media that is manufacturing these scandals. It's the House and Senate GOP. The media is just carrying their water for them. That being said, this NSA thing is looking more and more like another manufactured scandal. This leaker guy is making $200 K per year without even having a high school diploma? It just doesn't smell right...

riqster

(13,986 posts)
17. Given that the media is owned by those who finance the Reeps, it seems
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:59 PM
Jun 2013

...that there is little difference between the two these days.

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)
23. Thanks. I'm not surprised...
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:33 PM
Jun 2013

The fact that Glenn Greenwald is involved is the biggest red flag of all. Had it been someone like David Korn of Mother Jones, it would be another story. Korn is an actual muckracker, as opposed to a blogger. And, it's sad to see how low the Washington Post has fallen. I used to consider them a respectable newspaper. Not so much now.

Hekate

(90,827 posts)
73. "there’s a way to have this debate without selling out to misinformation"
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jun 2013
Canonizing bad reporting as a means of inciting a debate is as bad as no debate at all. Attachment to empirical reality must remain a central trait of the left, otherwise the progressive movement is no better than the non-reality based propagandists on the right who will say and do anything to further the conservative agenda.
http://thedailybanter.com/2013/06/nsa-story-falling-apart-under-scrutiny-key-facts-turning-out-to-be-inaccurate/

Another good article at the link. Bonus: I learned a brand-new word. Shpadoinkle.
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
20. Just Benghazi and the IRS? Shew, try birth certificate, college records, weather tampering
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jun 2013

Mother bashing...oh help me if I've left anything out. Those were just off the top of my head.

But the NSA thing does warrant a conversation in post 911 America, and wanting to participate in that conversation is not a detriment to the President. It is an asset.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
22. Absolutely, let's discuss
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:08 PM
Jun 2013

And roll back the Patriot act and all its children. I'm just saying let's get the facts before having that discussion, instead of leaping to conclusions.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
60. The problem is that they've already let the cat out of the bag.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 06:00 PM
Jun 2013

Unless you think "modest encroachment" is apt regarding civil RIGHTS

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
32. Because the 4th Amendment. Because $1 trillion per year is spent on the surveillance state.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jun 2013

Because it is a clear and present danger and it is absolutely out of control:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017124153

riqster

(13,986 posts)
33. And, keep in mind, we don't have all the details
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:40 PM
Jun 2013

All we have now are some disintegrating "news reports". We need solid information and clear heads to undo the Patriot Act and its brethren.

Running around doing the headless chicken dance serves nobody except the Reeps and the Corporate media types.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
40. Truth. And you've given me an idea for an OP, because the surveillance state HAS been proven to be
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:50 PM
Jun 2013

over-the-top, specifically in regard to their spying upon the Occupy Wall Street movement...

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
39. In the case at hand, it's about the NSA using warrants to obtain info from tech companies. So wtf
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:50 PM
Jun 2013

are you talking about…. and btw, I also think it's too large and a waste of money and too easily abused.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
71. What I'm talking about are the exaggerations in the "reporting"
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:12 PM
Jun 2013

Like direct back-door access and all the other since-debunked "facts" that people took as gospel, even after the media has repeatedly proven itself to be a partisan and untrustworthy information source.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
35. This has been going on for a long time............
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jun 2013

We knew the NSA was a disgrace.
We knew the ill-conceived patriot act was a cancer.
We just sort of forgot about it for about five years.

It is not the NSA scandal that is suspicious.
It is the timing of the NSA scandal that is telling.

Somewhere Karl Rove is laughing his ass off.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
38. That seems likely to me, too
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jun 2013

That's why I advocate remembering that the Media and Congress have been crying "Wolf" since Obama was running for President the first time. It ill behooves us to jump to conclusions: points like yours need to be front and center in our minds when this crap gets put out by our enemies.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
43. And although I will NOT secumb to the republican illness of blind following..........
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:55 PM
Jun 2013

2014: Get the vermin out of the House.
End the republican menace.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
63. For some Democrats, it's cool to bash Obama
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jun 2013

It shows that a person is better than RWers or something.
Knowing that this attitude exists, wouldn't it be absolutely perfect to have his own party perpetuate a scandal? It's a lot less work.

Gin

(7,212 posts)
42. When I listened to the Interview...it didnt sound credible.......i knew we were being monitored
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:53 PM
Jun 2013

After 911......so.....none of this is news....

If he is a plant to discredit the dems......it will all fail....soon.

Is he a pawn or the real thing?


riqster

(13,986 posts)
46. The problem with such failures
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:59 PM
Jun 2013

...is the discord they sow among us. If we would wait a day or three for confirmation before assuming that the Reep-controlled media was handing us truthful information, we'd all be better off.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
48. lindsey graham, peter king, and many GOPers (like many DUers) are all cools with this..
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:33 PM
Jun 2013

Mark Udall and Ron Wyden, on the other hand, aren't.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
66. Enough reason for me to be against it.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:35 PM
Jun 2013

I like Glenn Greenwald, unlike many here. I think he does good work. Democrats have their poor little feelings hurt that he goes after "their" guy. Obama's not my guy; I do not support him at all anymore. He promised transparency and gave us the opposite. He can go hell.

But Udall and Wyden have my full support.

bushisanidiot

(8,064 posts)
50. There is a republican behind every one of these fake "scandals".
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:37 PM
Jun 2013

the leaker in this latest issue worked for bush and bought the cheney "mushroom cloud" theory about Iraq HOOK LINE AND SINKER.
sorry, that's a zealous, flag waving right wing republican who is trying his best to help republicans win in 2014.

the entire strategy since the beginning of the year from republicans has been to cast a suspicion of doubt..
that don't think they actually have to prove anything, they just want to make it look like there are lots of
dots that need to be connected so that the EVIL, POWER HUNGRY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA can be
set up for impeachment.

that is it. that is all there is to this bullshit. it's disgusting that so many left wingers
in the press and folks like jon stewart are totally getting CATFISHED by the right.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
54. Even Al Gore is fooled. How inconvenient....
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:46 PM
Jun 2013
Al Gore: NSA Phone Records Collecting 'Obscenely Outrageous'

The Huffington Post | By Braden Goyette Posted: 06/06/2013 12:14 am EDT | Updated: 06/06/2013 9:48 am EDT

While Gore is best known for his work on climate change, he has also expressed his concern about threats to privacy rights in the past.

Earlier this year at South By Southwest, Gore decried a creeping government culture of surveillance.

“The government is about to complete this $2 billion facility in Utah that can sweep up everything” from phone calls to emails,: Gore said, according to tech news website Slashdot. “And the Supreme Court just ruled you can’t sue.”

Gore was also outspoken when the media revealed that the Bush administration had been engaging in warrantless wiretapping. The practice "virtually compels the conclusion that the president of the United States has been breaking the law repeatedly and persistently," Gore said in a speech in 2006, The New York Times reported.

Full article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/al-gore-nsa-phone-records_n_3394043.html


http://slashdot.org/topic/bi/sxsw-al-gore-talks-surveillance-culture-spider-goats/

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
57. Because this isn't the same thing?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:50 PM
Jun 2013

Yeah, Benghazi was massive unadulterated bullshit. The IRS thing almost as bad.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
64. Educate yourself.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jun 2013
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
67. As I have been wathcing this scandal and the others..
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:38 PM
Jun 2013

I am seeing that we are NOT watching what the Hill is up to.

There was a vote today to cut SNAP, a.k.a Food Stamps. This was in the Senate. One with even BIGGER cuts is to be voted for in the House.

What else is getting voted on that will hurt the 99% while we are not looking?

And it is interesting how all these scandals seem to be tying up the White House.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
91. Regarding your last sentence...
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jun 2013

Rand Paul is steadily trying to look like he's the good guy in all this. Ted fucking Cruz even jumped in on that action today. Glen Beck did, too, of course linking Obama to Hitler and the Holocaust, saying this program would leave no living Jews.

Meanwhile Greenwald has launched his own personal fundraising at The Guardian. The unlikely leaker was in a 5-star Hong Kong hotel, undoubtedly being watched and followed just because that's what they do there. But hey! Three cheers for FreeDumb and all that internet access China will (not) allow him.

Hekate

(90,827 posts)
72. Well, because, you know, Obama failed to give us our...
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jun 2013

Last edited Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:57 PM - Edit history (1)

... unicorns, or something like that. I distinctly remember him promising to breed them at Camp David. And instead he threw the unicorns under the bus. I know it's true because I read it here.

So all this other shit must be true. The man who recently ASKED THE U.S. CONGRESS TO CUT BACK PRESIDENTIAL POWERS is -- well, he must be doing something reprehensible, I am sure of it. Because I read it here.

Good essay at the link, btw. As Mr. Blunt and Cranky sums it up: So, why for the love of GOD, do so many of you keep believing those little f***ers when they cry wolf? Really, people, you should have learned by now to wait for proof before believing the lying wolf criers.


Edited to add: Ratfuckers and the fucking ratfuckers who breed them.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
98. As the Rude Pundit says
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:11 AM
Jun 2013

"You can't be a motherfucker if you don't fuck some mothers".

Agreed, no conspiracy involved. But listening to any of these fuckers is a bad idea.

neverforget

(9,437 posts)
79. Who are these Republicans that are going after the President on the NSA?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jun 2013

All I've heard is that Rand Paul hates this program. The rest of the Republicans in Congress are down with it.

neverforget

(9,437 posts)
93. Does McCain, Graham, Boehner, Cantor, McConnell ring a bell?
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:57 AM
Jun 2013

Not to mention torture memo author John Yoo. They think it's great.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
80. Because Bluffdale is not a lie
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jun 2013

They are actually building the damn thing.

That ain't no fucking mirage in the Utah dessert.

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
82. Was the IRS targeting deal disproven or something?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:36 PM
Jun 2013

Last I remember reading two Cincinnati agents testified that orders came from DC, rather than what was said by DC, which was that rogue agents in Cincinnati had conceived of and implemented the policy.

This was a policy, by the way, that the IRS itself put out there - they outted themselves in a planned and orchestrated move that included having a planted question asked.

They then apologized for targeting right-leaning political groups.

The head of that division has taken the fifth before Congress, refusing to answer questions about any of the charges.

Please tell me how that all got settled.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
86. What is phoney
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:39 PM
Jun 2013

Is the sudden interest. This shit has been on going. Everybody knows it. Why act surprised.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
100. There is another option
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:16 AM
Jun 2013

That is to listen to someone other than the crier who has been proven a liar.

That solves the problem and keeps us out of the lupine digestive tract.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They Cried “Wolf” About B...