Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

graywarrior

(59,440 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:36 PM Feb 2012

Is there any rational info about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood & Lothrop Stoddard?

I'm involved in a heated debate with someone over Planned Parenthood's history and its connection to Adolph Hitler. Most info I see online is extreme. Anyone know what the story is?

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is there any rational info about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood & Lothrop Stoddard? (Original Post) graywarrior Feb 2012 OP
here RainDog Feb 2012 #1
Thank you!! ! ! ! ! ! graywarrior Feb 2012 #3
this might help Botany Feb 2012 #2
Apparently, he was on the board of Sanger's Population Association of America graywarrior Feb 2012 #5
if that's what someone wants to argue RainDog Feb 2012 #11
Great point! graywarrior Feb 2012 #15
Or Prescott Bush KamaAina Feb 2012 #17
Wallis Warfield Simpson was hardly an heiress Owlet Feb 2012 #19
whatever she was RainDog Feb 2012 #22
No doubt about that. She was even rumored.. Owlet Feb 2012 #25
Sanger definitely was a proponent of eugenics, but support was widespread at that point. TheWraith Feb 2012 #4
That's what I'm trying to get across to this person graywarrior Feb 2012 #8
If they're linking Planned Parenthood and the Nazis, you need to redefine "reasonably intelligent." TheWraith Feb 2012 #21
LOL! graywarrior Feb 2012 #23
Isn't that the same argument that is used to justify slavery? nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #29
Link to Amazon's list of books by Margaret Sanger: enough Feb 2012 #6
... pamela Feb 2012 #7
Some people take information like this as fact graywarrior Feb 2012 #12
planned parenthood - or birth control RainDog Feb 2012 #9
Good info, thanks! graywarrior Feb 2012 #13
Don't know if this helps or hurts, but you can always drag Prescott Bush into it. tanyev Feb 2012 #10
Nice! graywarrior Feb 2012 #14
Well now THERE'S your Nazi connection. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #16
Sanger founded PP--she was also a staunch eugenicist librechik Feb 2012 #18
That's perfect. graywarrior Feb 2012 #20
There was a very good NPR piece on her that I listened to not long ago. Crunchy Frog Feb 2012 #24
Oh good, thank you Crunchy Frog! graywarrior Feb 2012 #27
I would not excuse... meaculpa2011 Feb 2012 #26
This is such a fascinating topic graywarrior Feb 2012 #28
Yes, a nazi by any other name. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #30
I suggest you read the following MadHound Feb 2012 #31
When did that get published? graywarrior Feb 2012 #32

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
1. here
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:44 PM
Feb 2012

graywarrior

(59,440 posts)
5. Apparently, he was on the board of Sanger's Population Association of America
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:49 PM
Feb 2012

and was impressed with Hitler after an interview with him.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
11. if that's what someone wants to argue
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:59 PM
Feb 2012

what about Henry Ford and his publication, The International Jew? Or Charles Lindberg - and both of their visits with Hitler? What about the British Monarchy - Wallis Simpson, an American heiress, was a great admirer.

this sort of attempt to claim something b/c of one moment in history is bullshit. it's intellectually dishonest.

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
19. Wallis Warfield Simpson was hardly an heiress
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:10 PM
Feb 2012

more like a golddigger. Or, in her case, crowndigger.

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
25. No doubt about that. She was even rumored..
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:48 AM
Feb 2012

..to have had an affair with Ribbentrop when he was ambassador to Britain in 1936. Lots of sources for the story, but here's one of the juicier ones.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jun/29/research.monarchy

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
4. Sanger definitely was a proponent of eugenics, but support was widespread at that point.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:49 PM
Feb 2012

Most major social movements supported eugenics during that time period, up until the Nazis made it uncool. There is no actual substantive connection between Planned Parenthood and Adolph Hitler.

graywarrior

(59,440 posts)
8. That's what I'm trying to get across to this person
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:55 PM
Feb 2012

How can a reasonably intelligent person believe this shit?

graywarrior

(59,440 posts)
23. LOL!
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 09:50 PM
Feb 2012

This person is always calling me with controversial ideas. Eventually, he ends up agreeing with me.

pamela

(3,469 posts)
7. ...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:54 PM
Feb 2012

I think the wikipedia article on Sanger is comprehensive and fair. Sanger wasn't perfect. She was ahead of her time in many ways and yet very much a product of her time in other ways.

Should we judge a modern organization based on some of the outdated views of its founder? I'm not sure I see the relevance. It's not like anyone is trying to put Sanger on the dollar or Mount Rushmore.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
9. planned parenthood - or birth control
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:55 PM
Feb 2012

was an issue going all the way back to the 1700s for feminists, btw. few were in favor of birth control b/c it was associated with prostitution - but condoms go way back in history.

in the 1800s, Annie Besant took up the issue in GB and was publicly taunted for this. the reason for the move to birth control was the move from agricultural to industrial jobs for working class people. there was no job security, no safety net, no worker protections - women who lost husbands were forced into prostitution to survive - so birth control (generally a condom or a sort of sponge) were seen as HUMANE ways to keep women from having to suck the cocks of old men in order to survive.

how dare anyone put forward the idea that women shouldn't be forced to suck stranger's cocks to make money!

all churches opposed this back then, too. of course, one real fear is that a woman would not get pregnant if having sex at her own discretion, even then.

Hitler made abortion laws stricter. The Weimar Republic had allowed abortion for the health of the mother and Hitler did away with this. He also executed an officer who got an abortion for his mistress.

If anyone wants to claim Hitler is tied to birth control, they have to ignore the few hundred years prior to his era - and they also have to ignore the reality that, in the 19th and 20th c., most whites were horribly racist. Ask someone if, because his or her great-grandparents thought the same things about blacks or jews that Hitler did - if that means those people were the equivalent of Nazis.

the reality is that the 19th c. was extremely racist b/c it was a time when Europe was colonizing other parts of the world, still - and when nations colonize, they dehumanize those they are subjugating to their rule.

just as is done today.


tanyev

(42,568 posts)
10. Don't know if this helps or hurts, but you can always drag Prescott Bush into it.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:58 PM
Feb 2012

Prescott S. Bush as Treasurer of Planned Parenthood First National Fundrasing Drive—1947

Planned Parenthood fundraising letter of January 8, 1947, lists Prescott S. Bush as treasurer of Margaret Sanger's first national fundraising drive. At that time, contraception was against the law in Connecticut, and the state had a large Catholic constituency. In 1950, during Prescott's first race for the U.S. Senate, the syndicated columnist Drew Pearson accused Bush of being a member of Planned Parenthood. Bush lost and accused Pearson of spreading the lie that cost him elected office. This fund-raising letter proved Pearson right.

http://www.randomhouse.com/doubleday/thefamily/extras_documents.php

http://www.randomhouse.com/doubleday/thefamily/media/thefamily_document007a.pdf

librechik

(30,674 posts)
18. Sanger founded PP--she was also a staunch eugenicist
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:07 PM
Feb 2012

as a pioneer in the progressive movement, eugenics is the notion which caused the Nazis to experiement on getting better Human Specimens..Nowadays progressives hate being reminded of this craap in their histpru the way Democrats hate to be reminded about Dixiecrats.

That was a long time ago and progressives no longer promote eugenics. And Dixiecrats are now Southern Repubs.

Crunchy Frog

(26,587 posts)
24. There was a very good NPR piece on her that I listened to not long ago.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:47 AM
Feb 2012

I believe that this link is the article on the piece that I heard. http://www.npr.org/2011/11/09/142097521/how-birth-control-and-abortion-became-politicized

(Besides the article, there is also a link to the audio. The article also has a link to a very extensive piece in the New Yorker.)

It's by far the most informative and myth-debunking piece on Margaret Sanger that I've come accross and, I believe, very well researched and referenced.

meaculpa2011

(918 posts)
26. I would not excuse...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 08:28 AM
Feb 2012

20th Century eugenicists any more than I would excuse 19th Century slave owners.

Some things are objectively evil regardless of time and place. Eugenics qualifies as objectively evil.

Their mission to protect society from teeming hordes of genetically inferior people should send chills up everyone's spine.

As a member of one of the teeming hordes targetted for destruction, I take these things personally.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
31. I suggest you read the following
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 11:16 AM
Feb 2012

Edwin Black's "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race" An eye opening look at a long concealed, black chapter of American history. Sanger is not the devil that the fundies paint her out to be, but neither is she the angel that the left portrays her as. Rather, she was human, with conflicting motivations, inspirations, faults, and regrets.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there any rational inf...