Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:57 PM Feb 2012

Cop allegedly pulled gun on pregnant woman over too many grocery items

Cop allegedly pulled gun on pregnant woman over too many grocery items

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/10/cop-allegedly-pulled-gun-on-pregnant-woman-over-too-many-grocery-items/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29

By Stephen C. Webster
Friday, February 10, 2012 15:02 EST



Police in Kendall County, Illinois said Friday that they were investigating whether an off-duty officer drew his firearm and pointed it at a pregnant woman because she had more items than Walmart recommends for self-checkout lanes.

Nicole Thurmond and husband Jason were reportedly checking out recently at a Walmart store in Oswego, Illinois when a man confronted them wearing civilian clothing, not identifying himself as an officer. The couple said it was only after his gun was drawn that the man told onlookers he was a police officer.

Nicole Thurmond told NBC Chicago that officer Craig French just walked up to her and said, “Don’t you know how to count? You are holding up the whole store.”

When her husband returned from getting an item they forgot, he described the situation he encountered as “a guy in her face, yelling at her.”
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cop allegedly pulled gun on pregnant woman over too many grocery items (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Feb 2012 OP
bring on the surveillance tapes... nt ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #1
Tapes mysteriously erased.... rfranklin Feb 2012 #3
since it was wal mart doing the taping ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #6
That was an egregious move on the cop's part. CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2012 #2
Well there goes his manners out the window. Couldn't he see she was pregnant? My goodness. southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #4
the gun did not come out until her husband shoved the off duty cop ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #8
Bullshit. Amerigo Vespucci Feb 2012 #10
the gun came out after physical contact ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #14
*therefore* lildreamer316 Feb 2012 #26
wow...thank you, proof-reader extraordinaire... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #35
You don't point a gun at someone unless you intend to kill them. nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #32
plenty of people point guns at people ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #37
And they're idiots. moriah Feb 2012 #41
THANK YOU!! n/t LadyHawkAZ Feb 2012 #42
Yup, that's the FIRST thing you learn. Bonobo Feb 2012 #43
and you suppose the off-duty here ISN'T a fucking idiot ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #46
once again, i agree... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #45
And I wish that there were fewer idiots in the world. moriah Feb 2012 #49
"Cop alledgedly pulls gun in dispute over too many grocery items" piedmont Feb 2012 #11
I agree with you... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #16
Touchy, touchy! piedmont Feb 2012 #22
the headline writer did it to get attention on the story ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #23
How many men Aerows Feb 2012 #12
i don't disagree with you one bit... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #15
You see these things all the time. alphafemale Feb 2012 #13
i am with the hubby ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #17
He had a right to protect his wife from a man assaulting her obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #19
don't disagree with you one bit... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #20
too many groceries in the cart was the proximate cause provis99 Feb 2012 #36
baloney... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #38
you don't seem to understand the legal definition of "proximate cause" provis99 Feb 2012 #39
so, then educate me... ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2012 #47
They're lucky he didn't taser them to death for such an outrageous RKP5637 Feb 2012 #5
If you're too smart they don't want you for a cop.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #9
Yep, clearly the higher ups don't want anyone that could challenge them. I recall RKP5637 Feb 2012 #29
Wal-Mart does not enforce this policy unless it's an extreme case. joshcryer Feb 2012 #7
Or when someone goes through with a buggy full of stuff and checks them out ten items at a time. alphafemale Feb 2012 #18
That just happened to me at the local produce store. alittlelark Feb 2012 #24
Maybe "she" was buying food for three different homebound individuals. lonestarnot Feb 2012 #25
Doubtful. Even so, she should use a regular lane. alphafemale Feb 2012 #31
first question. onethatcares Feb 2012 #21
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #27
I am thinking, yes, you are alone in thinking this. n/t demmiblue Feb 2012 #30
And your point? n/t Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #34
Then the African American husband is arrested and charged for protecting his wife from the POS cop Cali_Democrat Feb 2012 #28
OMG! Does that mean that I could have been arrested today RebelOne Feb 2012 #33
The charge against the husband should be dropped... ellisonz Feb 2012 #40
I remember when a store cop in Jackson, MS at Jitney Jungle ashling Feb 2012 #44
Excessive use of force. This is why the Department issued you a Taser. Follow protocol next time. leveymg Feb 2012 #48

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
6. since it was wal mart doing the taping
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:08 PM
Feb 2012

i bet it comes up at some point. wal mart will use it to protect themselves...

sP

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
2. That was an egregious move on the cop's part.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:01 PM
Feb 2012

I mean...because she had more items than Walmart recommends for self-checkout lanes?

It's a recommendation......not a rule.

A bit of over-kill, if you ask me.


 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
4. Well there goes his manners out the window. Couldn't he see she was pregnant? My goodness.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:05 PM
Feb 2012

What is this world coming to.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
8. the gun did not come out until her husband shoved the off duty cop
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:10 PM
Feb 2012

not that it is ok...but headline is misleading if not an outright lie.

sP

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
10. Bullshit.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:16 PM
Feb 2012
The couple said it was only after his gun was drawn that the man told onlookers he was a police officer.

When her husband returned from getting an item they forgot, he described the situation he encountered as “a guy in her face, yelling at her.”

If I walked up to a guy who was "in my wife's face, yelling at her," I'd push the LIVING FUCK out of him. He didn't identify himself. She wasn't "breaking the law." He crossed a line. FUCK him.

The headline is not "misleading" and it sure as fuck is NOT "an outright lie."

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
14. the gun came out after physical contact
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:18 PM
Feb 2012

hell, the husband even admitted it...the headline is therefor a lie.

what the fuck are you so jazzed about?

sP

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
35. wow...thank you, proof-reader extraordinaire...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:00 PM
Feb 2012

sorry i missed a character and it offended you so much you felt the need to post about it...

fo...

sP

moriah

(8,311 posts)
41. And they're idiots.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:10 PM
Feb 2012

The Four Rules:

1) All guns are always loaded.
2) NEVER point a gun at something you are not willing to destroy.
3) Keep your finger off the trigger until you are on target and have made the decision to shoot
4) Be sure of your target and what is beyond it

A gun should never be drawn until and unless you have decided that deadly force is necessary to protect your own life or the lives of people around you.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
46. and you suppose the off-duty here ISN'T a fucking idiot
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:36 AM
Feb 2012

the whole story screams 'idiot with a badge'...

sP

moriah

(8,311 posts)
49. And I wish that there were fewer idiots in the world.
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 12:49 AM
Feb 2012

Sadly, wishing Darwin would take care of the situation is not the best idea… all too often the idiots hurt other people instead of themselves.

A cop should know better, though.

piedmont

(3,462 posts)
11. "Cop alledgedly pulls gun in dispute over too many grocery items"
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:16 PM
Feb 2012

there, fixed it for you, and the cop still comes off as a hugenormous douche bag.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
16. I agree with you...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:20 PM
Feb 2012

and I was not accusing YOU of writing a bullshit headline. no need for YOU to change anything...you took it from the story as anyone would. the story is bad enough as it is...there was no need to make up crap in the headline...

sP

piedmont

(3,462 posts)
22. Touchy, touchy!
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:31 PM
Feb 2012

I was pointing out that the headline was perfectly correct except for the omission of two words. Whether the headline writer omitted them or someone else cut them out to save space is unknown.
Regardless, the jack-ass picked a fight over groceries, and when confronted for his out-of-line behavior he pulled a gun. The situation was created entirely by him...because of GROCERIES.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
23. the headline writer did it to get attention on the story
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:33 PM
Feb 2012

dollars to doughnuts...

sorry you think i am being touchy, just hate the state of 'reporting'. this is another example of poor journalism.

sP

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
12. How many men
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:16 PM
Feb 2012

WOULDN'T shove some strange man out of the face of their pregnant wife? I'd like to think most would. Threatening a pregnant woman could cause her to get so upset she goes into labor prematurely, and certainly is beyond the realm of civilized society in any case over such a petty issue.

Whoever this cop is, he's got a serious anger management problem if he's flipping out on pregnant women in Wal-Mart for having too many items in the self-checkout lane.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
15. i don't disagree with you one bit...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:19 PM
Feb 2012

the problem is simply in the outrageous headline. why write bullshit when the story itself is bad enough???

sP

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
17. i am with the hubby
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:22 PM
Feb 2012

you get in my wife's face yelling at her and you can bet your sweet ass i will step between you and separate you. the only one who lost it here is the off duty officer...who probably should have bit his tongue if he was having an issue.

sP

obamanut2012

(26,081 posts)
19. He had a right to protect his wife from a man assaulting her
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:23 PM
Feb 2012

And, he was legally assaulting her. He was off duty and not responding to any crime. He was out of line and should be fired, because he is a ticking lawsuit for his employer.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
20. don't disagree with you one bit...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:25 PM
Feb 2012

just amazed that with a story as bad as it is, the article headline is just wrong. the ass pulled his gun because he got shoved...regardless of whether he deserved to be shoved or not. he didn't point the gun at the woman because she had too many items in her cart.

sP

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
36. too many groceries in the cart was the proximate cause
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:01 PM
Feb 2012

so yes, he pulled his gun because she had too many groceries.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
38. baloney...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:04 PM
Feb 2012

using that logic you could extend it to, "Cop pulls gun on woman because she got out of bed." The contact was the cause...

sP

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
47. so, then educate me...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:40 AM
Feb 2012

proximate cause relies on 'forseeability' (god, i hate that word). where exactly does it lie when a woman with too many items in her cart results in an idiot off-duty cop pulling a gun?

sP

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
5. They're lucky he didn't taser them to death for such an outrageous
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:07 PM
Feb 2012

offense. I often wonder how many police departments do a psychological profile on people before hired.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. If you're too smart they don't want you for a cop..
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:11 PM
Feb 2012
http://nyletterpress.wordpress.com/2008/02/29/police-reject-candidate-for-being-too-intelligent/

A US man has been rejected in his bid to become a police officer for scoring too high on an intelligence test.

Robert Jordan, a 49-year-old college graduate, took an exam to join the New London police, in Connecticut, in 1996 and scored 33 points, the equivalent of an IQ of 125.

But New London police interviewed only candidates who scored 20 to 27, on the theory that those who scored too high could get bored with police work and leave soon after undergoing costly training.

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
29. Yep, clearly the higher ups don't want anyone that could challenge them. I recall
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:00 PM
Feb 2012

well once a senior manager telling me they refused to hire an individual because they could take/do their job easily. And, nothing better than dumb brutes to do your bidding. Amazing, isn't it ...

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
7. Wal-Mart does not enforce this policy unless it's an extreme case.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:08 PM
Feb 2012

I've seen people with entire buggies full of stuff, 30-40 items get away with it, I asked a cashier once what the deal was with that and she said that they're told not to enforce it.

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
18. Or when someone goes through with a buggy full of stuff and checks them out ten items at a time.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:22 PM
Feb 2012

FIVE times.

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
24. That just happened to me at the local produce store.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:39 PM
Feb 2012

She separated out items and had them rung up on 3 different receipts. It took 4-5 times longer than it should have.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
25. Maybe "she" was buying food for three different homebound individuals.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:55 PM
Feb 2012
Ever think of that? They have to eat too.
 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
31. Doubtful. Even so, she should use a regular lane.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 09:05 PM
Feb 2012

It's very rude to hold up other people who really did come in for an item or two.

onethatcares

(16,173 posts)
21. first question.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:28 PM
Feb 2012

how far over the limit of self checkout were they?

#2: were they really holding up the entire store??

jeeeeeezzzzz Loweze, imagine carrying a felony record around the rest of your life for having too many groceries
run thru a checkout line in a grocery store.

Response to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
28. Then the African American husband is arrested and charged for protecting his wife from the POS cop
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:59 PM
Feb 2012

Fucking bullshit!

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
33. OMG! Does that mean that I could have been arrested today
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 09:18 PM
Feb 2012

because I checked out with 20 items in the 15 items only lane?

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
40. The charge against the husband should be dropped...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:09 PM
Feb 2012

...and the officer should lose his job and face criminal charges. You do not draw and point a firearm unless you feel your life is in imminent danger.

Guns Guns Guns - The Answer

ashling

(25,771 posts)
44. I remember when a store cop in Jackson, MS at Jitney Jungle
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 12:00 AM
Feb 2012

actually shot a guy who was running out with a six pack of beer. At the time my wife was an officer in a development and training organization (I dont rem3emer the name, the American Society of something) anyway, a few weeks later I was at a meeting and sat at a table with the human resources lady from Jitney,


When I lived in Washington state I worked one Christmas season at Fred Meyer (in electronics). We had to do training as a cashier at their training store. We were told that if the alarm goes off or if you see someone running out of the store with something you let them go.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
48. Excessive use of force. This is why the Department issued you a Taser. Follow protocol next time.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 02:26 PM
Feb 2012

Two-day paid suspension. Next. . .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cop allegedly pulled gun ...