Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,257 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:59 PM Feb 2012

i'm with republicans on this one: employers should not be required to fund employee birth control.

in fact, employers should be out of the health care / health insurance business entirely.

the federal government should provide medicare for all, so that no one's health is dependent on their employment situation.

then businesses can just be about business, employment can just be about employment, and health can be just about health.

and if someone wants birth control or not, it has nothing to do with their employer.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
i'm with republicans on this one: employers should not be required to fund employee birth control. (Original Post) unblock Feb 2012 OP
No, you aren't. Republicans would scrap Medicare altogether. closeupready Feb 2012 #1
That would be the ideal, of course. silverweb Feb 2012 #2
Why do they pay for Viagra but not Birth Control? liberal N proud Feb 2012 #3
Do they actually pay for Viagra????? Alameda Feb 2012 #4
Why, yes. Yes, they do. There are even 'quotas' for how many pills you can msanthrope Feb 2012 #6
Yes the hypocricy is absurd liberal N proud Feb 2012 #10
Because pregnancy is a life changing event Thav Feb 2012 #11
Way hey hey?? Fawke Em Feb 2012 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2012 #5
Contraceptives are Now Routinely Covered Under Employer Plans indykatie1955 Feb 2012 #7
Right on! CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #8
that would certainly make more sense Douglas Carpenter Feb 2012 #9
what about birth control prescribed as hormone therapy? pnwest Feb 2012 #12
yet another reason to just get it through a medicare for all program. unblock Feb 2012 #13
I'd think that plans that include birth control would be less expensive FarCenter Feb 2012 #14
Medicare for all. BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 #15
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
1. No, you aren't. Republicans would scrap Medicare altogether.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:03 PM
Feb 2012

So you'd have no coverage from your employer's health insurance, and none from the government. Way to go.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
2. That would be the ideal, of course.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:04 PM
Feb 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]But we're nowhere near there yet, so we have to do what we can.

liberal N proud

(60,338 posts)
3. Why do they pay for Viagra but not Birth Control?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:10 PM
Feb 2012

I would think that any insurer would be all about covering birth control. The cost is well below that of pregnancy and adding another dependant to the insurance bill.

The bean counters are not doing their job on this one.


 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
6. Why, yes. Yes, they do. There are even 'quotas' for how many pills you can
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:18 PM
Feb 2012

get per month on most insurance plans.

There are all sorts of snarky things I could say here, but it really just speaks for itself, doesn't it?

Thav

(946 posts)
11. Because pregnancy is a life changing event
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 04:35 PM
Feb 2012

that is expensive, time consuming and resource intensive for many many years.

Whereas not being able to get it up for 30 seconds of way hey hey is downright embarrassing!

I do not understand it either, it's one of those paradoxes that will cause your head to cave in should you try to understand the logic behind it.

indykatie1955

(63 posts)
7. Contraceptives are Now Routinely Covered Under Employer Plans
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:36 PM
Feb 2012

The change is that they will now be available without cost sharing to the member as are all other services deemed Preventive under ACA guidelines. I'm glad Obama stepped forward sooner rather than later with an accommodation for the religious organizations. PP and NOW support his recommended approach. The conversation can now shift to what this is really about, Repubs don't want any women having access to contraceptives at no cost and Santorum doesn't want access even with a cost associated. This is an argument that Dems will win and get women out to vote at higher levels hopefully. Interestingly enough many of the large Catholic hospital systems and educational facilities already cover contraceptives. The Bishops must not be aware of that.

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
8. Right on!
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 04:18 PM
Feb 2012

Get all the Insurance Companies, Corporations, Lawyers, and the rest of them out of it. For one thing Health Care is no longer "insurable". It has become something the Government should run. But I am for the original Medicare Part A and B. Not all the later changes. Back in the 60's and 70's it worked great. But it only covered Hospital and Dr and Outpatient bills for accidents and illness. I will take it. We could afford it.

pnwest

(3,266 posts)
12. what about birth control prescribed as hormone therapy?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 05:22 PM
Feb 2012

...as medicine? For dysmenorrhea (so?) Menopause?

unblock

(52,257 posts)
13. yet another reason to just get it through a medicare for all program.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 05:25 PM
Feb 2012

why on earth should your employer be involved in any way in such matters?

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
14. I'd think that plans that include birth control would be less expensive
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:13 PM
Feb 2012

Because paying for pregnancy and childbirth benefits is really expensive.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
15. Medicare for all.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 11:15 AM
Feb 2012

I'm excited that soon I too will have insurance that covers medical needs. I have a plan right now that allows 6 doctor visits per 12 months. Even though I'm grateful for the 6 visits, that is definitely rationed medical care. I have a problem that needs more help, but I'll be waiting until I can afford to go to a doctor, I hope my problem can wait too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»i'm with republicans on t...