General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats do not demonize entire states like Republicans.
Imagine if President Obama made a speech in which he spoke of the evil conservatives who populate Texas. What if he made up a clever nickname for Utah like "You duh". Could Obama speak of the people of Arizona while circling his ear with a forefinger?
Republican presidents and the hopefuls who seek that office consistanly point to states like Massachusetts as terrible bastions of liberalism, even using terms like "Taxachusetts" in reference to the citizen's lack of American ideal. They chide California as a state full of liberall loons and openly express their disdain for the entire state and the Americans who live there.
And you know what? They get away with it time after time as if it's common knowlege that only red states are inhabited by true Americans. I'm glad that Democrats don't resort to such playground politics to score points with their base, but the right would never let them get away with it if they tried.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Maybe those running for office don't, but we of the grassroots keyboard activists sure do.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)The book isn't about Kansas it is about the abandonment of economic progressivism and thereby allowing conservatives to be able to run exclusively on trumped up religious dogmatic BS issues.
I think you should read the book and not just cite the title.
provis99
(13,062 posts)But the silly "What is the matter with Kansas" thesis was completely blown away by actual political scientists years ago.
Really the book was fairly good and as decent social theory as any other. Most of the heavy critiques came from conservatives with an axe to grind and who benefited from people forgetting about economics and voting for values crap.
provis99
(13,062 posts)Larry Bartel's "What's the Matter with What's the Matter with Kansas" pretty much destroyed the whole premise of the book.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Bartel a definition of working class based on incomes that make 35K or less. Obviously the working poor have not shifted much but the working poor never voted much either.
Bartel destroyed nothing and the people that hated Frank's book the most tended to be DLC sorts that didn't wan't anyone heaping scorn on their political methadology.
While I agree on some analysis on other papers that Bartel has authored his critique of Frank's book was fairly poor.
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~dlinzer/Frank-ClassDismissd.pdf
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)But name the last GOP president that did such a thing. Not candidate, but actual sitting president. I'd be surprised if you found one. Most don't want to "give away" whole states like that. Once you get away from encumbents, I wouldn't be surprised if you could find more than a few folks that have made fun of Texas, or Florida.
unblock
(52,253 posts)they know all about the top dog keeping it clean while the minions do the dirty work.
note that their top dog rarely calls for the others, even the rabid pit bulls, to back off.
JohnnyRingo
(18,636 posts)I remember wondering at the time how people in Massachusetts thought about being alienated from a presidential podium like that.
I don't know if he made comments about the Hollywood liberals that infest California while in office, but I have to assume he did in one way or another. After all, it's an applause line at any GOP fundraiser.
former9thward
(32,027 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,636 posts)and there's some truth that the majority who put Kasich in the governor's mansion may not have the standard Hoyle deck of cards in their hands, but I was refering to politicians who make speeches from a national platform, not posters on an internet debate forum
emilyg
(22,742 posts)the whole South.
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)Whether it is the simple dismissal of any value in the "flyover" states/regions or "teh South is a bunch of Rednecks" type stuff. And individual states get slammed too.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)I live in Florida.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)Somehow it was not the fault of the priests, but the liberal climate in the state. The Kerry and Kennedy spokespeople responded calling him out.
For fun, rather than giving a 2005 link - here are the DU comments - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4092037
Funny, someone even speaks of Mitt and Santorum running against he other for President - and this was back when Mitt hadn't yet said he was not running again.
rbnyc
(17,045 posts)...often made generalizations about certain states and regions. But I wouldn't if I were a public official. And I don't think I've even done it in a public forum.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)My state never gets any love at DU
wait for it
When was the last time you ever heard anyone say anything nice about my state, the state of confusion?
Bed and Nun
(9 posts)Now that you mention it.
(just kidding!)
provis99
(13,062 posts)`First in everything bad, last in everything good` is an old Mississippi joke.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Go figure.
Can you say "south"?
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)talk the same way about entire countries. For instance, France. And Russa. Alienating countries that we are supposed to be allies with or at least on good terms with. Proving that they are unskilled and ignorant of international relations.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)oh, wait...DU trashes entire regions.
sP
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)The South makes good barbecue, as does the Midwest. If they could just get their politics on straight that would be better.
*SARCASM