General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn this new era with only enough jobs for half the population for the next 50 yrs should we cut
the school system in half?
Or should we change the school system to a dual system, one for tech job prep and one for creative day care.
Technology has replaced half the labor force and it may take 100 yrs to adapt, acknowledgment is the first step to solutions.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)a dual education system, one for the people that matter and one for the rest, and that's been a disaster.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)Electronic textbooks, never set foot on campus before exams. Total college education costs a few grand.
Wave of the future. Sorry, sororities and fraternities.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)hunter
(38,322 posts)I'm sort of serious here.
Our "productivity" is going to kill us, and just as bad, people who make the lowest wages see no benefit from it. The profits all go to the very wealthy.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)why we were making all those innovations and allowed the parasite class to reap all the benefit.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)and we need to learn to deal with it.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)for the same talking point, birthed at the cato institute.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)not bad looking, possess a wide range of salable knowledge, experience, skills, and talents, I'll be just fine. In fact, all I have to do to be much better than fine is to stop seeing the world around me and succumb to the authoritarian BS you seem to have so thoroughly embraced.
I've just always wanted to help the people that always get the shitty end of the stick by giving them what they need to have a better life. Usually all they need is an understanding of how things actually are, rather than how they've been told and believe it is.
ArcticFox
(1,249 posts)We need a way to pass on the benefits of productivity gains to those not at the top.
kentuck
(111,107 posts)By cutting hours, they can create more jobs. How?
Cut the work week to 35 hours per week. Overtime for anything over 35 hours. Cutting 5 hours off the normal work week would be like cutting 1 out of every 8 workers. However, by cutting hours, if employers wanted the same production they got with 40 hours per week, they would have to hire more people, ideally it would be one person for every seven people now working? However, we know that would not happen. First of all, employers would attempt to squeeze that lost production out of the other seven workers. Unfortunately, one cannot get blood out of a turnip whenever people are squeezed to the max already. They can give no more.
How would we cope with the lost wages? Would not a substantial increase in the minimum wage drive up the wages of all workers? But it would take a Democratic Congress to pass something like that. But not just any Democratic Congress, it would take a progressive-minded Democratic Congress.