Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
Sat Jun 1, 2013, 07:48 PM Jun 2013

NY Times: Thompson Sees No Need to Bar a Police Tactic

I voted for Thompson in 2009 (against Bloomberg). I was considering voting for him this time around as well, until I read this:

[font size=4]Thompson Sees No Need to Bar a Police Tactic[/font]

The aggressive era of stop-and-frisk policing in New York City is, in every sense of the word, on trial: the subject of a high-stakes federal court case, scorching denunciations from civil rights leaders and emotional calls for its dismantlement by liberal lawmakers.

But in a stand that is surprising black leaders and worrying some allies, William C. Thompson Jr., the sole African-American candidate for mayor, is steadfastly unwilling to join the tear-it-down chorus.

Instead, Mr. Thompson is embracing elements of the polarizing crime-fighting strategy and winning praise from an unlikely duo deeply associated with it: Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani.

< . . . >

But in a city whose racial politics are never far from view, Mr. Thompson’s moderate stance on an issue that has consumed the city’s black and Latino community is inflaming a number of high-profile African-American Democrats, even holding up the endorsement of a party stalwart, the Rev. Al Sharpton.

<. . . . >

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times: Thompson Sees No Need to Bar a Police Tactic (Original Post) markpkessinger Jun 2013 OP
Again, why I oppose law enforcement unions: Dawson Leery Jun 2013 #1
Police "unions" protect corrupt cops. They are not real unions. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #2
Thompson's stance is not moderate, it is right wing. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #3
Agreed. n/t markpkessinger Jun 2013 #4

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
1. Again, why I oppose law enforcement unions:
Sat Jun 1, 2013, 07:58 PM
Jun 2013

"On Wednesday, Mr. Thompson’s restrained approach paid by far its biggest political dividend when a coalition of unions representing about 100,000 city law enforcement officials voted to endorse his Democratic campaign, making clear that what appealed to its members was his comparatively conservative posture on criminal justice, according to people told of the decision."

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
3. Thompson's stance is not moderate, it is right wing.
Sat Jun 1, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jun 2013

It is also supportive of what is in practice the most racist police policy in the US and also the least productive of actual offenders.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY Times: Thompson Sees ...