Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:36 AM Feb 2012

Obama’s Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court

Obama’s Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court

By Igor Volsky

Julie Rovner has a good piece explaining how President Obama’s contraception regulation is modeled on existing state laws in 28 states, a December 2000 ruling by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — which ruled that “failure to provide such coverage violates the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act” — and has even been upheld in several court challenges:

In 2004, the California Supreme Court upheld that state’s law, in a suit brought by Catholic Charities, on a vote of 6-1.

The court ruled that Catholic Charities didn’t qualify as a “religious employer” because it didn’t meet each of four key criteria (which, by the way, are the same as those in the new federal regulation):

    The organization’s primary purpose is “the inculcation of religious values.”
    It primarily employs people of that religion.
    It primarily serves people of that religion.
    It’s a registered nonprofit organization.
Two years later, in 2006, New York’s top state court rejected a claim by Catholic Charities and several other religious groups that the state’s contraceptive coverage law discriminated against them because it exempted churches but not their religiously-affiliated groups.

“When a religious organization chooses to hire non-believers, it must, at least to some degree, be prepared to accept neutral regulations imposed to protect those employees’ legitimate interests in doing what their own beliefs permit,” the justices wrote.

Indeed, the government should not infringe on a house of worship’s religious doctrine, but it should also protect the liberties and rights of employees who work for religiously officiated institutions that serve the public good. Colleges or universities are free to preach about the evils of contraception to their workers. Yet since 58 percent of women use contraception for medical reasons besides, or in addition to, family planning, the decision to swallow the pill should be left to the conscience of every employee and the employer should never be allowed to stand in between a woman and her doctor.

- more-

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/10/422636/obamas-conscience-protection-clause-has-been-upheld-in-court/

Excellent information.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2012 OP
K & R. n/t FSogol Feb 2012 #1
Thanks! n/t ProSense Feb 2012 #2
DU rec...nt SidDithers Feb 2012 #3
Outstanding! spooky3 Feb 2012 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama’s Conscience Protec...