Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama’s Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court
Obamas Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court
By Igor Volsky
Julie Rovner has a good piece explaining how President Obamas contraception regulation is modeled on existing state laws in 28 states, a December 2000 ruling by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which ruled that failure to provide such coverage violates the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act and has even been upheld in several court challenges:
Indeed, the government should not infringe on a house of worships religious doctrine, but it should also protect the liberties and rights of employees who work for religiously officiated institutions that serve the public good. Colleges or universities are free to preach about the evils of contraception to their workers. Yet since 58 percent of women use contraception for medical reasons besides, or in addition to, family planning, the decision to swallow the pill should be left to the conscience of every employee and the employer should never be allowed to stand in between a woman and her doctor.
- more-
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/10/422636/obamas-conscience-protection-clause-has-been-upheld-in-court/
By Igor Volsky
Julie Rovner has a good piece explaining how President Obamas contraception regulation is modeled on existing state laws in 28 states, a December 2000 ruling by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which ruled that failure to provide such coverage violates the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act and has even been upheld in several court challenges:
In 2004, the California Supreme Court upheld that states law, in a suit brought by Catholic Charities, on a vote of 6-1.
The court ruled that Catholic Charities didnt qualify as a religious employer because it didnt meet each of four key criteria (which, by the way, are the same as those in the new federal regulation):
When a religious organization chooses to hire non-believers, it must, at least to some degree, be prepared to accept neutral regulations imposed to protect those employees legitimate interests in doing what their own beliefs permit, the justices wrote.
The court ruled that Catholic Charities didnt qualify as a religious employer because it didnt meet each of four key criteria (which, by the way, are the same as those in the new federal regulation):
- The organizations primary purpose is the inculcation of religious values.
It primarily employs people of that religion.
It primarily serves people of that religion.
Its a registered nonprofit organization.
When a religious organization chooses to hire non-believers, it must, at least to some degree, be prepared to accept neutral regulations imposed to protect those employees legitimate interests in doing what their own beliefs permit, the justices wrote.
Indeed, the government should not infringe on a house of worships religious doctrine, but it should also protect the liberties and rights of employees who work for religiously officiated institutions that serve the public good. Colleges or universities are free to preach about the evils of contraception to their workers. Yet since 58 percent of women use contraception for medical reasons besides, or in addition to, family planning, the decision to swallow the pill should be left to the conscience of every employee and the employer should never be allowed to stand in between a woman and her doctor.
- more-
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/10/422636/obamas-conscience-protection-clause-has-been-upheld-in-court/
Excellent information.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1305 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court (Original Post)
ProSense
Feb 2012
OP
FSogol
(45,490 posts)1. K & R. n/t
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Thanks! n/t
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)3. DU rec...nt
Sid
spooky3
(34,460 posts)4. Outstanding!