General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRubio Bill Lets ANY Employer Deny Birth Control Coverage
Legislation introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to reverse the Obama administrations birth control rule would effectively permit any employer to deny contraception coverage in their employee health plans, critics note.
Any employer could deny birth control coverage under Rubios bill and all the employer would have to do is say its for a religious reason, said Jessica Arons, Director of the Womens Health and Rights Program at the liberal Center for American Progress. There is no test to prove eligibility. Its a loophole you could drive a truck through.
The Rubio bill, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, comes in response to a Catholic firestorm over the fact that the administrations exemption on its birth control rule does not include religious hospitals and universities along with churches. But this bill appears to go far beyond that, permitting any employer to claim the religious exemption without a criteria.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told reporters Thursday the measure would grant the exemption to not just Catholic employers to all employers.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/gop-bill-lets-any-employer-deny-birth-control-coverage.php
Do the women of Florida have any idea that this guy wants to take away birth control coverage?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)tanyev
(42,559 posts)quakerboy
(13,920 posts)It may not be a winning issue for them, but its better than letting the focus move to jobs or the economy.
Response to OregonBlue (Original post)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
louslobbs
(3,234 posts)Lou
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)then there must have been a reason and it is an affront to his plan to attempt to change that.
The same holds true for those he has stricken barren.
Bet they would sing a different tune real fast.
Initech
(100,076 posts)If they're gonna make it difficult to get birth control why don't we do the same for Viagra, Cialus, or the hundreds of other boner pills out there.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)"It is now quite lawful for a Catholic woman to avoid pregnancy by a resort to mathematics, though she is still forbidden to resort to physics and chemistry." (H.L. Mencken, Notebooks)
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Shouldn't it be up to each individual to chose whether they want to have access, and then further if they want to use the access?
Freedom. Personal responsibility. That sort of thing.
JSnuffy
(374 posts)... but there should be some control by the employer as to what is covered.
Some of the more whackjob homeopathic stuff comes to mind.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Medicine should be covered.
Homeopathy is not medicine. The employer has no need to block it, any more than they need to block their health care provider from providing auto oil changes.
Within the realm of medical services, your employer should have NO say what specific items are covered.
tyne
(1,248 posts)I can think of is that they're hoping we start burning our bras. They're kind of kinky that way.