Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:39 PM Feb 2012

Rubio Bill Lets ANY Employer Deny Birth Control Coverage

Legislation introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to reverse the Obama administration’s birth control rule would effectively permit any employer to deny contraception coverage in their employee health plans, critics note.

“Any employer could deny birth control coverage under Rubio’s bill and all the employer would have to do is say it’s for a religious reason,” said Jessica Arons, Director of the Women’s Health and Rights Program at the liberal Center for American Progress. “There is no test to prove eligibility. It’s a loophole you could drive a truck through.”

The Rubio bill, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, comes in response to a Catholic firestorm over the fact that the administration’s exemption on its birth control rule does not include religious hospitals and universities along with churches. But this bill appears to go far beyond that, permitting any employer to claim the religious exemption without a criteria.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told reporters Thursday the measure would grant the exemption to “not just Catholic employers — to all employers.”

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/gop-bill-lets-any-employer-deny-birth-control-coverage.php

Do the women of Florida have any idea that this guy wants to take away birth control coverage?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rubio Bill Lets ANY Employer Deny Birth Control Coverage (Original Post) OregonBlue Feb 2012 OP
Hell, why not. If a specific church can deny, why not everyone. nm rhett o rick Feb 2012 #1
Do they REALLY want to go there? tanyev Feb 2012 #2
They really do quakerboy Feb 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #3
+1 Tesha lol.......nicely put. louslobbs Feb 2012 #7
If God has cursed a man and made his member to be flaccid MattBaggins Feb 2012 #10
Ha ha I like it. Initech Feb 2012 #11
Can't believe we're debating birth control in this day and age pokerfan Feb 2012 #5
Why is it an employers prerogative? quakerboy Feb 2012 #6
Not relating to birth control.... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #9
Disagree quakerboy Feb 2012 #12
The only explanation tyne Feb 2012 #8
He's auditioning for Romneys VP pick(nt). bluecoat_fan Feb 2012 #13
Co-sponsored by a Democrat! Fucking Manchin muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #14

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
4. They really do
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:53 PM
Feb 2012

It may not be a winning issue for them, but its better than letting the focus move to jobs or the economy.

Response to OregonBlue (Original post)

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
10. If God has cursed a man and made his member to be flaccid
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:34 PM
Feb 2012

then there must have been a reason and it is an affront to his plan to attempt to change that.

The same holds true for those he has stricken barren.

Bet they would sing a different tune real fast.

Initech

(100,076 posts)
11. Ha ha I like it.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:44 PM
Feb 2012

If they're gonna make it difficult to get birth control why don't we do the same for Viagra, Cialus, or the hundreds of other boner pills out there.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
5. Can't believe we're debating birth control in this day and age
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:55 PM
Feb 2012

"It is now quite lawful for a Catholic woman to avoid pregnancy by a resort to mathematics, though she is still forbidden to resort to physics and chemistry." (H.L. Mencken, Notebooks)

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
6. Why is it an employers prerogative?
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:56 PM
Feb 2012

Shouldn't it be up to each individual to chose whether they want to have access, and then further if they want to use the access?

Freedom. Personal responsibility. That sort of thing.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
9. Not relating to birth control....
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:11 PM
Feb 2012

... but there should be some control by the employer as to what is covered.

Some of the more whackjob homeopathic stuff comes to mind.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
12. Disagree
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:46 PM
Feb 2012

Medicine should be covered.

Homeopathy is not medicine. The employer has no need to block it, any more than they need to block their health care provider from providing auto oil changes.

Within the realm of medical services, your employer should have NO say what specific items are covered.

tyne

(1,248 posts)
8. The only explanation
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:07 PM
Feb 2012

I can think of is that they're hoping we start burning our bras. They're kind of kinky that way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rubio Bill Lets ANY Emplo...