Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Fri May 24, 2013, 11:33 AM May 2013

The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History



Terracide and the Terrarists

Destroying the Planet for Record Profits

By Tom Engelhardt

We have a word for the conscious slaughter of a racial or ethnic group: genocide. And one for the conscious destruction of aspects of the environment: ecocide. But we don’t have a word for the conscious act of destroying the planet we live on, the world as humanity had known it until, historically speaking, late last night. A possibility might be “terracide” from the Latin word for earth. It has the right ring, given its similarity to the commonplace danger word of our era: terrorist.

SNIP...

Their prior knowledge of the damage they are doing is what should make this a criminal activity. And there are corporate precedents for this, even if on a smaller scale. The lead industry, the asbestos industry, and the tobacco companies all knew the dangers of their products, made efforts to suppress the information or instill doubt about it even as they promoted the glories of what they made, and went right on producing and selling while others suffered and died.

And here’s another similarity: with all three industries, the negative results conveniently arrived years, sometimes decades, after exposure and so were hard to connect to it. Each of these industries knew that the relationship existed. Each used that time-disconnect as protection. One difference: if you were a tobacco, lead, or asbestos exec, you might be able to ensure that your children and grandchildren weren’t exposed to your product. In the long run, that’s not a choice when it comes to fossil fuels and CO2, as we all live on the same planet (though it's also true that the well-off in the temperate zones are unlikely to be the first to suffer).

SNIP...

The Alternatives That Weren’t

It didn’t have to be this way.

On July 15, 1979, at a time when gas lines, sometimes blocks long, were a disturbing fixture of American life, President Jimmy Carter spoke directly to the American people on television for 32 minutes, calling for a concerted effort to end the country’s oil dependence on the Middle East. “To give us energy security,” he announced,

“I am asking for the most massive peacetime commitment of funds and resources in our nation's history to develop America's own alternative sources of fuel -- from coal, from oil shale, from plant products for gasohol, from unconventional gas, from the sun... Just as a similar synthetic rubber corporation helped us win World War II, so will we mobilize American determination and ability to win the energy war. Moreover, I will soon submit legislation to Congress calling for the creation of this nation's first solar bank, which will help us achieve the crucial goal of 20% of our energy coming from solar power by the year 2000.”


CONTINUED...

http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175703/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_the_biggest_criminal_enterprise_in_history
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History (Original Post) Octafish May 2013 OP
And then Reagan BrotherIvan May 2013 #1
Reagan's first executive order eliminated price controls on petroleum and natural gas. Octafish May 2013 #2
And Raygun removed the solar panels from the WH roof byeya May 2013 #3
They weren't Solar Panels, but Solar Hot Water Heaters. bvar22 May 2013 #10
It would have been an everyday symbolic reminder to everyone that Bill Clinton was not byeya May 2013 #12
I think Bush Sr adieu May 2013 #8
Reagan raised it to 65. Octafish May 2013 #29
Reagan did not repeal the 55 limit. former9thward May 2013 #28
Reagan raised it to 65. Octafish May 2013 #31
The law was passed by Congress. former9thward May 2013 #32
And a return to big cars, big trucks, and big SUVs--with big engines. moondust May 2013 #9
Shhh! I was chastized mightily on this very board by Democrats BrotherIvan May 2013 #21
That's highly unusual. moondust May 2013 #22
It was an eye-opening exchange to say the least BrotherIvan May 2013 #23
It is fairly new here, time was Reagan Worship was just not done here, that all changed Dragonfli May 2013 #25
Well put BrotherIvan May 2013 #26
This was the speech that mobilized the oil magnates and their stooges, the Bushs, iemitsu May 2013 #4
Backed by the full faith and credit of a planet full of Hitlers Octafish May 2013 #15
You're welcome, Octafish, and thank you for validating my iemitsu May 2013 #16
That is the situation, 'a people molded by disinformation served as entertainment at a CI circus.' Octafish May 2013 #27
This patting each other on the back thing is kind of nice. I don't usually engage in iemitsu May 2013 #33
Carter tried to make us rethink about our environment malaise May 2013 #5
I think that rather than "they tried to destroy him. iemitsu May 2013 #17
Same goons malaise May 2013 #18
That's what I see. iemitsu May 2013 #19
"...we might have had a different world..." CrispyQ May 2013 #6
The oil industry was a "{Democratic Party" industry until the Democrats got sick of the oil byeya May 2013 #7
Yet another powerful example of the failures of Capitalism. Ron Green May 2013 #11
Nothing is going to stop rampant capitalism from destroying the planet. Rex May 2013 #13
Thank you. H2O Man May 2013 #14
Ditto! A DU Treasure to be sure. Thank you. 7wo7rees May 2013 #24
Thank you felix_numinous May 2013 #20
= The Bush Family. ANY other answer is a sub-set, IMO! (It didn't start with 41.) WinkyDink May 2013 #30

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. Reagan's first executive order eliminated price controls on petroleum and natural gas.
Fri May 24, 2013, 12:50 PM
May 2013

Then he took the solar panels off of the White House roof and repealed the 55-mph speed limit as his answer to the energy crisis.

How many millions of barrels per oil per day has that cost?

What's truly staggering are the costs, if they could be calculated, in human life.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
10. They weren't Solar Panels, but Solar Hot Water Heaters.
Fri May 24, 2013, 02:54 PM
May 2013

One of the things for which I have never forgiven Bill Clinton was when he did NOT replace the Panels on the White House roof On Day ONE!
That was a foreshadow of his entire administration.

Instead of working to reverse the damage done by Reagan to Organized LABOR, the Working Class, and the Environment,
he helped to consolidate their gains,
gave these ruinous policies a Democratic Party endorsement,
and then advanced the Ball toward the Republican goal line.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
12. It would have been an everyday symbolic reminder to everyone that Bill Clinton was not
Fri May 24, 2013, 03:55 PM
May 2013

another Wrinkled Reagan. But, no, it was not to be.

Clinton and 0bama have scored a lot of own goals.

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
28. Reagan did not repeal the 55 limit.
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:35 PM
May 2013

Congress which was controlled by Democrats at the time passed a law that did on rural interstates. All federal limits were repealed under Clinton. And that is a good thing. The 55 limit was idiotic especially in the West. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Maximum_Speed_Law

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
31. Reagan raised it to 65.
Sat May 25, 2013, 07:36 PM
May 2013

It's detailed at your link.

When Pruneface was a candidate in 1980, I believe, he was asked, I believe, in a debate, for his solution for the energy crisis? "Repeal the 55mph speed limit."

Sounds like something George Will would write after going through a stolen debate briefing book.

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
32. The law was passed by Congress.
Sat May 25, 2013, 07:40 PM
May 2013

Detailed at my link as I said. 55 was an idiotic law and I'm glad its gone.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
9. And a return to big cars, big trucks, and big SUVs--with big engines.
Fri May 24, 2013, 02:06 PM
May 2013

All that conservation stuff of the 70s was for sissies! Girly men!

And Detroit loved it because those Reagan-inspired macho gas guzzlers were highly profitable! (Until they weren't.)

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
21. Shhh! I was chastized mightily on this very board by Democrats
Fri May 24, 2013, 09:16 PM
May 2013

who thought it was A-okay they voted for Reagan the Anti-Christ. My first ignore. Jeesh, what is the world coming to? I was ten when he came in and even I knew he was a bastard.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
23. It was an eye-opening exchange to say the least
Fri May 24, 2013, 11:34 PM
May 2013

And it was they who put me on ignore for suggesting that being fooled by that demon was not something to crow about.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
25. It is fairly new here, time was Reagan Worship was just not done here, that all changed
Sat May 25, 2013, 06:27 AM
May 2013

around '08 when the closet "Reagan Democrats" AKA moderate Republican's Registered as Democrats came out. Obama praised Reagan, ever since, no more closet, they had their kindred hero validate their right wing economic fetishes and they have been cheering on neo-liberal "Democratic" trickle down centrism without shame ever since.

I didn't see it coming, I thought this was a center left Board until a neoliberal was elected, I was fooled by them for years and embarrassingly Naive regarding Obama, I didn't expect him to govern center right and thought he would change things.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
26. Well put
Sat May 25, 2013, 09:50 AM
May 2013

I was always shocked when fervent Obama supporters tried to justify and 11th dimensionify the Reagan worship. I found it as alarming as the FISA vote and the public financing thingy. A harbinger of things to come I guess.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
4. This was the speech that mobilized the oil magnates and their stooges, the Bushs,
Fri May 24, 2013, 12:55 PM
May 2013

to run for ( and orchestrate the first "October surprise" to influence the outcome) political office.
This is why Carter had to be discredited. This is why Reagan was recruited as cover for the BFEE, who were committed to maintaining oil industry supremacy.
Since the CIA's mandate is to protect the interests of big business and since they, the CIA, are the world's foremost experts on propaganda and coercion, and since we, the taxpayers foot the CIA's budget, it seems we are fighting a losing battle.
Pogo was right about spotting the enemy.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. Backed by the full faith and credit of a planet full of Hitlers
Fri May 24, 2013, 05:09 PM
May 2013

Thank you, iemitsu, for putting it into your words. By pointing out the unfortunate truth -- that not every policeman is our friend -- Pogo helps us find the way out of the situation. Now all we need are a few government types to step to the plate and out of the lifeboat.

From DU, May 12, 2005:

A Planet Full of Hitlers

The world's billionaires, led by the Bush "madministration," are acting like a planet of full of Hitlers. They are willing to invade whatever region in the world has what the world needs most -- oil.

Black gold. Texas tea. Petrodollars.

They figure they have all the money. And basically, apart from a Soros here and a Gates there, they do.

And thus, the world’s billionaires and their hounds of the BFEE want to spend it all before they die. And they have the plan and cash on hand to do so.

Consider the Bush agenda: All War. All the Time. Government spending for the MI-Complex, transferring trillions to the wealthy corporate owners, war and all.

These are the likes of the “industrialists” Mussolini, Franco and Hitler so loved.

And like the fascist trifecta, the American fascists of the BFEE have bought all the political power. Don't just think Tom Roach Motel DeLay and Mr. Friskie Frist. Remember Prescott Bush and Averell Harriman and Allen Dulles and Rheinhard Gehlen and Igor Orlov.

What can we do about it? They’ve bought all the legal power, built law schools for Federalist Society AND Opus Dei judges. Think Bill Eagle Eye Rehnquist and Antonin Fat Tony Scalia.

These turds of the BFEE have worked all the tax breaks and bankrupty laws for the rich. Uncle Sam reverse-Robin Hoods wealth to the top 1-percent of country.

And what do these rich turds who prop up Bush use their tax savings on? They certainly haven't invested it in making America a better place to work or live; they've invested in "off-shoring."

Lots of the tax money goes to buy more vacation homes, yachts and jet planes. Most goes offshore to the Caymans and Switzerland.

And of course they want more without having to pay for the damage to the environment. Farmland depletion in the USA. Rain forest depletion around the globe. Oceans getting acidic. Fish stock depletion. Global air pollution and water shortages.

Well. OK. Maybe a case can be made it’s the rich folk’s money. They can do what they want. But they should pay their fair share of taxes! After all, the rest of society helps keep them in their position. And its our brothers and sisters in the armed forces who are giving their lives to keep their oil and power and privilege.

Budget red ink means no money for middle class. No money for schools. No money for cities and suburbs and farms. No money for roads. No money for science and R and D. No money for the future.

And the media? What media? What Fairness Doctrine?

They cover up their materialism and venality with all the talk about Faith-based this and Conservative-values that. But the reality is these are sinister wolves and satanic bed-wetting bastards in sheep's clothing we are dealing with.




Wasn’t that what Bush really meant when he told Bob Woodward “History? Who cares about history? In a hundred years we’ll all be dead.”

Just like Hitler. And just like Hitler, Bush wants to take us all with him.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
16. You're welcome, Octafish, and thank you for validating my
Fri May 24, 2013, 07:29 PM
May 2013

thoughts. Also, thank you for posting "A Planet Full of Hitlers" from DU, 2005. Did you author that post? I am certain that I read it back then because the ideas and phraseology have been incorporated into my being.
As someone, who teaches history, I am not likely to forget Bush's comment on the subject of history nor am I likely to forget his family connections, to the villainous characters mentioned in the 2005 post and their bastard step-child, the CIA.
Pogo's wisdom offered introspective folk guidance in the past but I fear that we have become a people without time for or interest in self or civic evaluation, a people molded from dis-information served as entertainment at a counter-intelligence circus. We don't know up from down and we can't spot the many places in between. We've lost our common sense, something even those who failed to complete grammar school once had, today many with college degrees lack this basic thought processing skill.
Do you think we will recognize those few decent government types if and when they git out of the boat? Will we embrace the good governmental policies they promote or will we condemn them as evil?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
27. That is the situation, 'a people molded by disinformation served as entertainment at a CI circus.'
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:04 PM
May 2013
JFK understood the powers of government and how to apply them to make life better for ALL. That has become an increasingly rare sentiment in the nearly 50 years since, particularly for the wealthy upon the election of the traitor Tricky Dick. After Pruneface the Mobster, the rich have never had it so good. As for peace and prosperity, War Inc., LBJ signed off on the Gulf of Tonkin and waslikethis with Halliburton's parents.

As for the lifeboat, there may not be anybody on it I'd trust with a packet of ketchup. Here's somebody I'd like ordered off the boat to face questioning by a Grand Jury about the time before he got into the Life Boat Castle line of business:



The Really Creepy People Behind the Libertarian-Inspired Billionaire Sea Castles

The stinking rich are planning billion-dollar luxury liners that keep the land-based Americans they've plundered at a safe distance.

AlterNet / By Mark Ames
June 1, 2010

What happens when Americans plunder America and leave it broken, destitute and seething mad? Where do these fabulously wealthy Americans go with their loot, if America isn't a safe, secure, or even desirable place to spend their riches? What if they lose faith in their gated communities, because those plush gated communities are surrounded by millions of pissed-off Americans stripped of their entitlements, and who now want in?

The first such floating castle has been christened the " Utopia"--the South Korean firm Samsung has been contracted to build the $1.1 billion ship, due to be launched in 2013. Already orders are coming in to buy one of the Utopia's 200 or so mansions for sale- -which range in price from about $4 million for the smallest condos to over $26 million for 6,600 square-foot "estates." The largest mansion is a whopping 40,000 square feet, and sells for $160 million.

SNIP...

Both Thiel and Milton Friedman's grandson see democracy as the enemy--last year, Thiel wrote "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible" at about the same time that Milton Friedman's grandson proclaimed, "Democracy is not the answer." Both published their anti-democracy proclamations in the same billionaire-Koch-family-funded outlet, Cato Unbound, one of the oldest billionaire-fed libertarian welfare dispensaries. Friedman's answer for Thiel's democracy problem is to build offshore libertarian pod-fortresses where the libertarian way rules. It's probably better for everyone if Milton Friedman's grandson and Peter Thiel leave us forever for their libertarian ocean lair--Thiel believes that America went down the tubes ever since it gave women the right to vote, and he was outed as the sponsor of accused felon James O'Keefe's smear videos that brought ACORN to ruin.

SNIP...

While neither Bush nor the Bin Ladens are principals in the Frontier Group, its founding director, Frank Carlucci, is a name they know well, and you should too. Carlucci ran the Carlyle Group as its chairman from 1989 through 2005, right around the time that the wars started going undeniably bad, and floating castles started to look like a viable plan. But Carlucci's past is much weirder and scarier than most of us care to know: whether it's his strangely timed appearances in some of the ugliest assassinations and coups in modern history, or serving as Carter's number two man in the CIA, and Ronald Reagan's Secretary of Defense, if Frank Carlucci (nicknamed "Creepy Carlucci" and "Spooky Frank&quot is the founding director of a firm that's building floating castles, it's a bad sign for those of us left behind.

I'll get into Carlucci's partners in the Frontier Group in a moment, but first, let's reacquaint ourselves with Frank Carlucci. From an early age, Carlucci learned the importance of getting to know the right people in the right places. He studied at Princeton in the mid-1950s, where as luck should have it, Carlucci roomed with Donald Rumsfeld. Both Carlucci and Rumsfeld shared a passion for Greco-Roman wrestling at Princeton, and both went on to serve in the Navy after Princeton. Their paths would split and merge several times over the next few decades, even as they remained close personal friends throughout their lives. In the late 1950s, Carlucci briefly served as an executive at a lingerie manufacturer, Jantzen (the Victoria's Secret of its day), but quickly left to join the State Department.

CONTINUED...

http://www.alternet.org/story/147058/the_really_creepy_people_behind_the_libertarian-inspired_billionaire_sea_castles



PS. Thank you for the outstanding replies. Thanks also for the kind words about my work (I did write that, eh, rant). Ripple.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
33. This patting each other on the back thing is kind of nice. I don't usually engage in
Sun May 26, 2013, 02:49 AM
May 2013

this sort of exchange but in this case, it seems warranted. Thank you too for providing thought provoking information and analysis and for demonstrating solid knowledge of our recent past. Plus, your style is lively and refreshing. A pleasure to read.
Do you write for a living?

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
17. I think that rather than "they tried to destroy him.
Fri May 24, 2013, 07:33 PM
May 2013

They will pay" you really meant, "They were paid handsomely to destroy him.".

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
6. "...we might have had a different world..."
Fri May 24, 2013, 01:31 PM
May 2013
With their staggering profits, they (big oil) could have decided anywhere along the line that the future they were ensuring was beyond dangerous. They could themselves have led the way with massive investments in genuine alternative energies (solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, algal, and who knows what else), instead of the exceedingly small-scale ones they made, often for publicity purposes. They could have backed a widespread effort to search for other ways that might, in the decades to come, have offered something close to the energy levels fossil fuels now give us. They could have worked to keep the extreme-energy reserves that turn out to be surprisingly commonplace deep in the Earth.

And we might have had a different world (from which, by the way, they would undoubtedly have profited handsomely).


And that is the saddest thing. We could have had a different world & they still would have made a fortune.
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
7. The oil industry was a "{Democratic Party" industry until the Democrats got sick of the oil
Fri May 24, 2013, 01:35 PM
May 2013

depletion allowance - 27.5% - and closed that giveaway. This giveaway didn't trouble the R's so Big Oil started giving the majority of its money to them.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. Nothing is going to stop rampant capitalism from destroying the planet.
Fri May 24, 2013, 04:00 PM
May 2013

There is no one in charge in any place that can stop the select few from destroying the global ecology and the economy. We are just here as innocent witnesses to the destruction of our planet. It will not stop until it directly affects the select few and by then the world will be just one huge desert. We will have to adjust to living on a barren planet.

H2O Man

(73,559 posts)
14. Thank you.
Fri May 24, 2013, 04:10 PM
May 2013

Recommended, with pleasure.

We appreciate how much you contribute to bringing the Truth to this forum! You are a special friend, who I have the utmost respect for.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
24. Ditto! A DU Treasure to be sure. Thank you.
Sat May 25, 2013, 12:31 AM
May 2013

Octafish and H2O you are both truly a couple of the best at DU.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Biggest Criminal Ente...