Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Mandatory Thursday Malloy Truthseekers check in!! Back in Black & a new Kitteh gif
It seems as though these 3 links work - These are the Updated Station lists
http://radiotime.com/station/s_45192/KTLK_1150.aspx < 10pm- 12pacific? http://www.960knew.com/main.html <1 to 3 am pacific? http://themic921.com/main.html < 12-3am central
http://www.mikemalloy.com /
http://www.siriusxm.com/siriusxmleft...=1283872745429 http://stream.am950ktnf.com:8000/listen.pls
Here's the Malloy stream link- http://server2.whiterosesociety.org:...ruthseeker.m3u
http://www.mikemalloy.com/members/member.php
For a more low key Chatroom try- http://headonradionetwork.com/chatroom / Here's the HORN Chatroom link- http://client0.sigmachat.com/sc.php?id=137054
Mike's Blog Picks
http://www.fairywoodland.com / http://candorcandy.vox.com / http://www.unknownnews.org/ http://www.pbsblog.com/ http://www.americanfilms.com / http://www.officialwire.com / http://www.justcoffeeart.com / http://www.democraticwarrior.com http://www.markmarshall.com / http://www.democracyinteractive.com / http://www.redpill8.blogspot.com/ http://www.switch2green.org http://www.superbeans.com /
Please Support www.WhiteRoseSociety.org if you can! & Please support The HORN if you can- http://www.headonradionetwork.com
Here's a note from the HORN. If you all can support the HORN They really need it!! Thanks
Introducing the HORN Forums!!!- http://headonradionetwork.com/forum /
http://www.ustream.tv/themikemalloyshow http://www.livestream.com/mikemalloyshow
An Important Message
A Message To Our KPTK Seattle, Washington Listeners
We want to thank all of you to listening to The Mike Malloy Show on KPTK and Seattle, Washington. We are sorry to announce that KPTK has ceased to broadcast Progressive Talk. The good news is that you can continue to listen to the program! We invite you to join your fellow Truthseekers who have become part of our Malloycast community by subscribing to our premium podcasts. This allows you to download the program when you want, wherever you want, and listen commercial-free at your convenience! Accept our sincere thanks for all the ways you “keep it lit” by supporting our independent broadcasting efforts.
http://www.mikemalloy.com/2013/05/back-in-black-7/ <links here
Back in Black
Written on May 23, 2013
Mike is live tonight and will be talking about the London killing, the Apple-IRS hypocrisy, Obama’s marathon press briefing, and the Behghazi fizzle.
Re posted from yesterday by request, here is the article from The Atlantic that explains why there is no “there” there in the Benghazi witch-hunt: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/05/so-who-lied-abc-news-about-benghazi-emails/65350/
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl‘s revelation of the White House’s role in 12 revisions to the Benghazi talking points propelled the story, long percolating in conservative media, into a bona fide scandal. But then CNN’s Jake Tapper‘s revelation of what the emails actually said revealed that to be a fake scandal. So who lied to Karl? While Karl’s report implied that he was quoting actual emails between the State Department, the CIA, and the White House, they were actually summaries written by congressional staffers who were allowed to read and take notes on the emails earlier this year. Their notes were not transcripts. The summaries quoted deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes saying “the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department,” when he actually wrote, ”We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation.”
The Daily Beast’s Michael Tomasky wonders whether it’s time for Karl to burn his source for lying to him. “Suppose you were a journalist and a source told you someone had committed a felony but that person had not,” Tomasky writes “Do you have to protect that source? No.” It would not be surprising if Karl does not agree. But we can narrow the mystery a little bit.
Republicans leaked the email summaries, CBS News’ Major Garrett reports. Given the way Karl’s anonymous source justified the inaccurate summary in a subsequent email, that seems likely. The source said:
“WH reply was after a long chain of email about State Dept concerns. So when WH emailer says, take into account all equities, he is talking about the State equities, since that is what the email chain was about.”
Who could that be? On February 15, the general counsel for the national intelligence director’s office briefed the Senate Intelligence Committee, leadership, and staff on the emails, according to the Associated Press. On March 19, there was a similar briefing in the House. Karl reports that included the members of the House Intelligence Committee, their staff, and a senior aide to Speaker John Boehner. (Boehner was invited, but sent an aide instead.) That’s a lot of people, though a lot less than all Republicans on Capitol Hill. It’s 12 senators, plus the staffers who attended the meetings, and 12 representatives, plus Boehner’s aide.
And we can probably narrow the source even further, to just the House. A report by five House Republican committeemen made claims that seem based on the inaccurate summaries of the emails. As The Daily Beast’s Eli Lake reported April 23, “to protect the State Department, the Administration deliberately removed references to al-Qaeda-linked groups and previous attacks in Benghazi in the talking points used by Ambassador Rice.” (We now know that the CIA’s Mike Morrell actually took out those references.)
The report says Rice “was informed that the talking points were created for Congressional members, and modified to protect State Department equities and the FBI investigation.” The phrase “State Department equities” is awfully close to the language of the summaries provided to ABC’s Jonathan Karl, as well as the justification of the summaries. Only House Intelligence Committee chair Mike Rogers was both on the committee that saw the emails and signed the House report, but obviously the report, and the “equities” line, could be based on the emails of many representatives’ staffers.
We are LIVE at 9PM ET tonight! 877-996-2556
Follow us on Twitter #Truthseeker @mikemalloyshow and Mike may read your Tweet on the air!
Check out the Progressive Voices app an listen on Tune In Radio to this and other libreal programs!
———————————————————————————————-
Get your message on the air without spending a fortune on radio advertising contracts! Click the “sponsor” button above to advertise your small business or product to like-minded Truthseekers. You can support your local independent progressive broadcaster AND promote your cause or product at the same time! It’s a win-win!
Be Sociable, Share!
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
Hi ralps. Hello Everyone.
Checking in.
