General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama plan to privitize TVA ib 2014 budget
http://www.alternet.org/economy/shocker-republicans-fight-obama-plan-privatize-hugely-popular-cheap-energy-source-tvaBuried within the fine print of the 2014 Obama budget is a startling bit of history-changing policy. The government, the administration says, should consider selling off the Tennessee Valley Authority, one of the nations largest publicly operatedthat is, socialistinstitutions, and the largest public power provider in the country.
The TVA is a non-profi, free-standing public authority established by the Roosevelt administration during the Depressiona very large utility, if you like. It provides 165 billion kilowatt hours of power to 9 million Americans, has $11.2 billion in sales revenue, employs more than 12,500 people, and provides other educational, training and related services (such as navigation and land management, flood control, and economic development) to the people in the states and region around the Tennessee river basin.
Strikingly, its the free-market Republicans who object to this proposed privatization. Senator Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican who has vehemently opposed government tax credits and subsidies for renewable energy, calls the proposal one more bad idea in a budget full of bad ideas, and fears that privatization would lead to higher energy costs for his constituents.
discuss
djean111
(14,255 posts)Free to propose whatever he wants to, no need to worry about votes.
Wow. And Lamar Alexander is correct about the higher prices, and higher prices is the fucking point.
byeya
(2,842 posts)the Tennessee Valley Authority.
Let's see how the god fearing people feel when they see their power bills surge.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)The rich and the super-rich choose. The MSM in their area choose. The leaders of the tax-free churches choose.
Those who rely upon stereotypes and exploit these people choose.
They don't. At best, they are given choices between two groups of candidates who both represent the rich and the super-rich.
Did you think that Obama represented them? Who's getting ready to reward his rich friends by privatizing the TVA?
byeya
(2,842 posts)It's a democracy. Fuck 'em.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)he was a Congressman from Tennessee from 197785 and a Senator from Tennessee from 198593. Then he served the people from Tennessee by being the Vice-President during the Clinton administration from 1993-2001.
That is a long record of voters from Tennessee not turning their backs on Al Gore.
When the U.S. Supreme Court selected Bush to be the President, as far as I know, not one member of the Supreme Court was from Tennessee.
You say, "The god-fearers turned their backs on Al Gore."
We're done.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)n/t
ProSense
(116,464 posts)April 10, 2013
President Barack Obama released his fiscal year 2014 budget earlier today. It includes unexpected language about TVA in the chapter entitled, Creating a 21st Century Government. According to the information in the budget, the Administration intends to undertake a strategic review of TVA.
We will be working with the Office of Management and Budget to provide the information they request regarding the strategic review. While we do this, our employees will stay focused on doing their jobs, serving our customers and the people of the Tennessee Valley, said Bill Johnson, President and CEO.
Even though TVA is owned by the federal government, it does not receive taxpayer dollars and its debt is not taxpayer funded. According to John Thomas, CFO, TVA is the lowest cost business model and the best value for the region. We remain financially healthy.
http://www.tva.com/news/releases/aprjun13/obama_budget.html
Here is the budget language:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2014/assets/21st_century.pdf
While Republicans are railing against the TVA proposal, which is a review, they're obstructing the creation of a similar venture.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/20/fact-sheet-president-s-plan-make-america-magnet-jobs-investing-infrastru
It will be a government-owned entity subject to Congressional oversight. In terms of economic development, think of it like the TVA (http://www.tva.com/abouttva/index.htm) on a larger scale.
Helped attract or retain more than 40,500 jobs
Leveraged more than $4.3 billion in capital investment
http://www.tva.com/abouttva/factbook.htm
http://www.tva.com/abouttva/index.htm
Cha
(297,618 posts)ProSense!
paulk
(11,586 posts)"Reducing or eliminating the Federal Governments role in programs such as TVA, which have achieved their original objectives and no longer require Federal participation, can help put the Nation on a sustainable fiscal path. Given TVAs debt constraints and the impact to the Federal deficit of its increasing capital expenditures, the Administration intends to undertake a strategic review of options for addressing TVAs financial situation, including the possible divestiture of TVA, in part or as a whole. "
ProSense
(116,464 posts)about this many times. The same people opposing the infrastructure bank, which will be government-owned like the TVA, are rushing to support this based on language about a review. The current head of the TVA is from a subsidiary of Duke Energy. He held the CEO position at Duke for a minute.
CEO quits on day 1, gets $44 million for his troubles
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002912761
Cha
(297,618 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Have we had enough yet? Or are we still pretending we have representation?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)oblivious. Unless we can figure out a way to spread the truth, we are sunk.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)And what you described in post 11 is exactly what needs to happen. Education a la post 31.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)~Morpheus
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)but soon.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)See? This is just another episode of Eleventy-dimension, Razz-matazz, Bi-partisanshipyness®© that'll spread the suffering and move us forward while not looking backwards!!! Just like when:
* - DOJ-WH Star Chamber murders and the abolition of Due Process
* - The droning of women, babies and children
* - Refusing to close Guantanamo
* - Torture force-feedings Guantanamo prisoners
* - Surveillance of citizen's email, phone records and any damned thing else they want
* - Social Security and Medicare reductions (AKA: Let's Kill The Grandfolks Program)
So you see, selling-off TVA will reduce the taxpayers costs and while saving the country and reducing the deficit and at the same time it'll provide each American with their daily requirements of Vitamin C, B12 and Riboflavin.
- Now how can you beat that???
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)or so we've been told.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)libdude
(136 posts)it being said any better. We should be moving more towards public ownership of power companies, banks, etc.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Can we get this in a billboard? Like....all over the internet?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Pragdem
(233 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)...is in jeopardy.
Is there anything about the New Deal that President Obama likes?
Those policies (and the Fair Deal, and the Great Society) built the largest,
wealthiest, and most upwardly mobile Working Class the World had ever seen.
...now being dismantled,
...by "Democrats"?
The Privatization of our Commons will not end well for anyone but the 1%.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their promises or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Obama isnt a Republican he is a corporate sponsored Democrat. We need to reframe this class battle. It isnt Democrats (goodness) vs. Republicans (badness). The war is between the Elite 1% and the rest of us.
hay rick
(7,639 posts)And them is the 1%. We need something to wake up the suckers who are being punked by the Republicans.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)WTH IS OBAMA DRINKING?
paulk
(11,586 posts)it's, "who is he drinking with"?
forestpath
(3,102 posts)the president of the United States (sorry, I can't remember who).
This is just more proof of that.
Obama never saw a government program he didn't think a corporation should get a cut of, or in this case, own.
4_TN_TITANS
(2,977 posts)Why would anybody mess with it? NPT had a great series on it, if anyone wants to know more.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)after the chained CPI debacle, does this surprise anyone?
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)that he proposes. So, is this the smart way to get the GOP to vote for what he actually wants?
I have heard that he is a master of multi-dimensional chess...
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)What else can he do?
Sooner or later, he's got to run out of things that he can do to betray the FDR legacy.
Celldweller
(186 posts)If the utility is sold to a "for-profit" ownership... people will be screwed and have to pay more $$?
If it's non-profit now that means that your utility bill reflects the actual cost of delivering the power. The bills could skyrocket.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)It has ceased to be surprising...
Phlem
(6,323 posts)paulk
(11,586 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)I'll edit my post.
it was a ridiculous swooning thread the other day.
-p
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The .01% who are determined to force their neo-feudal dystopian nightmare on everyone else, can NOT
allow EVEN A TRACE of a successful public institution; i.e. Obama is carrying their water, to disappear the
"evidence" and erasing any memory of how some public institutions DO work splendidly, as publicly-run
and publicly owned agencies.
I'm sorry, but Obama is behaving like a lapdog for .01%'s on this one.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Maybe he's busy working on a retirement plan.
The Last Dem.
(76 posts)Last edited Wed May 22, 2013, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Not only that, they would lay off half of the work force.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)I know from talking to these guys that they are Union. As soon as these plants are privatized, the first order of business will be to abolish those contracts. They'll be fired and offered to return to work for less money, worse benefits and lower safety standards. This is Obama's idea of progress.
derby378
(30,252 posts)...is enact policies that make it that much harder for poor people to provide electricity for themselves and their families.
Anyone who has ever had their lights and heat switched off in the dead of winter because the money just isn't there for the electricity bill understands this all too well.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... it's our good old Corporate Congress. This country is a joke. And we're all a bunch of lemmings for letting our democracy go to the dogs. It's almost got to the point where we need a shadow congress to keep tabs on what the hell they are sneaking through up there. I guess that's what a supposed "free press" is supposed to do, but that's corporatized too. Stick a fork in us. We're done. We're all Republicans now.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Its coal and nuclear power production however are dinosaurs. Government will have a hard time ridding itself, internally, of nukes and coal.
Best to sell those plants off to private firms and let them close down and bury those dinosaurs? That may be the plan, Stan.
Hydro is a great backup and demand modulator. It should not go private, especially since all the waters behind those dams are public.
Cut out and cast away the worst of TVA and keep the best. Worth considering, imo.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"TVA was great"
...is still great, but who cares about the facts? The budget suggested a review, and there are a lot of issues to consider, like updating old coal plants.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021188496
T.V.A. Agrees to Shutter 18 Generators That Use Coal
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/science/earth/15tva.html
The budget called for a review.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2886292
Become suspicious when Republicans oppose privatization. That is not what this is about.
The review will happen, and we will see.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageNavigator/fld_TN_TVA_Coal_in_Crisis_Report.html
NASHVILLE, Tenn. Conservation groups have filed a legal challenge to the Tennessee Valley Authority on the grounds that it violated the National Environmental Policy Act when the federal power company finalized its plan to spend more than $1 billion to retrofit the Gallatin Fossil Plant, a coal-fired power plant near Nashville.
The Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association, Tennessee Environmental Council, Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity are represented by Earthjustice and Southern Environmental Law Center in the suit. The Gallatin Fossil Plant is more than 50 years old and is one of the largest sources of air and water pollution in the state. If TVAs plans move forward, the coal-fired power plant will continue to pollute for decades to come.
In its haste to spend more than $1 billion of customer money to prop up an obsolete coal plant, TVA violated the law, said Louise Gorenflo, Beyond Coal chair of the Tennessee Chapter of the Sierra Club. There is too much at stake for the Sierra Club and our partners to sit back and do nothing. The health and wellbeing of Tennessees families, environment, and economy are at risk. Thats why it is so important that TVA follow the law when making such important decisions.
To build the project, TVA would clearcut a forested wildlife management area on Old Hickory Lake, replacing it with 100-foot tall landfills of hazardous coal ash. TVAs plans will require the popular Cumberland River Aquatic Center to relocate; the Center is one of the worlds most successful hatcheries of endangered freshwater mussels. Finally, by choosing to invest in an aging coal facility, TVA will increase costs for consumers over decades.
- more -
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2013/gallatin-04-25-2013.html
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)he should have changed parties. too late now though, hope & change fans.