General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOPer Who Got Millions in Farm Subsidies Thinks the Poor Should Starve Rather Than Get Food Stamps
May 20, 2013 |
Stephen Fincher, a deranged Republican congressman from Tennessee, is very angry that the federal government is committed to preventing poor people from starving to death:
Republican Congressman Stephen Fincher of Tennessee, who supports cuts to the program, had his own Bible verse from the Book of Thessalonians to quote back to Vargas: The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat, he said.
The program in question is SNAP, better known as food stamps. Fincher and his ultra-right-wing friends in the House are furious about the fact that the worst economic crisis in 80 years has resulted in more Americans needing food stamps. The whole point of programs like SNAP and other automatic stabilizers, of course, is that they kick in when the economy is struggling and people need help. Fincher is shocked and horrified by this heinous policy of ensuring that poor people and their children don't starve. Food is to be earned! Sure, this is the richest country in the history in the world, but if we provide our citizens with food to eat, then freedom is obviously dead.
He fulminates about people who are allegedly "unwilling to work" sucking off the government teat with impunity. This is a patently dishonest representation of the SNAP program. Most people who receive food stamps cannot be dismissed as losers who are "unwilling to work." Nearly half (47%) of all food stamp recipients are children. Another 8% are 60 years of age or older. The "working poor" - people who live in a household with income from work - represent another 41%. Between children, the elderly, the working poor, and people who want a job but cannot find one - someone should tell Fincher that there are still more than 3 unemployed job seekers for every 1 opening - that leaves very few people who can be accurately described as being "unwilling" to work. It's also worth noting that the average monthly SNAP benefit is a whopping $287. It takes a deeply disturbed person to crusade against providing this class of people with food to eat, when the economy is this battered, and when the broad economic benefits of the program have been so well established (at least in the reality-based community).
Now, this would not normally be worthy of mention. Hardly a day goes by without some Republican sadist expressing fury that poor people have it so good. Devising new ways to make the peasants suffer is what makes Republicans wake up in the morning. What's fascinating about this particular case, though, is Fincher's background.
MORE...
http://www.alternet.org/goper-who-got-millions-farm-subsidies-thinks-poor-should-starve-rather-get-food-stamps
spanone
(135,855 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)having large farming interests.
d_r
(6,907 posts)that snap money has went right in to his pocket and helped to keep the prices up so he can make a living.
calimary
(81,383 posts)Paul the Apostle. Who could be rather a hard-ass.
Our misguided friends who consider themselves strict "sons of Paul the Apostle" will always find something in the Bible to buttress their unforgiving, rigid, uncaring, selfish, short-sighted, pennywise/pound-foolish, and horrendously uncompassionate views. And notice not one of them EVER quotes the Beatitudes to support the points they make. Not once. It's as though the Beatitudes don't exist. Even though the Beatitudes came from the mouth of Jesus.
The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)Honestly....
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)You piece of shit, most adults on Food Stamps do work, but unfortunately for them their employers pay them poverty wages which nobody with a family can survive on. As for the elderly and children who receive Food Stamps, well i guess we can send 'em to the camps, huh?