Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:23 AM Feb 2012

Contraception "controversy," solved

WED FEB 08, 2012 AT 10:58 PM PST
Contraception "controversy," solved
bySimplifyFollow

Are you a religious organization running a public institution, such as a hospital? Do you want to exclude contraceptives and birth control from the health insurance plans offered to your employees?

Fine: forego federal funding.

That is all.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/09/1063067/-Contraception-controversy-solved?via=siderec
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Contraception "controversy," solved (Original Post) kpete Feb 2012 OP
Another Idea TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #1
Exactly. Jackpine Radical Feb 2012 #2
What if they shutter rather than comply? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #3
Are these hospitals and universities all unionized? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #4
K&R varelse Feb 2012 #5
I don't think that is correct cthulu2016 Feb 2012 #6
also, single payer MisterP Feb 2012 #7

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. Exactly.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:30 AM
Feb 2012

That's the precise solution that occurred independently to my wife & me.


I hope those idiots realize that the majority of practicing catholics support birth control, so their intransigence is cutting the legs out from under their own base of support.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
4. Are these hospitals and universities all unionized?
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:20 PM
Feb 2012

If the Catholic authorities just said "we're withdrawing all healthcare; here's what we used to spend, go and try to fund your own healthcare with that, and blame the government for changing the rules" could the workers effectively resist? Because I think the cardinals are quite capable of using their employees' health as pawns in this political argument. If they can change the benefits, they may well. It's not just a question of "the Catholic authorities will inevitably have to either pay more because of the loss of federal funding, or pay for contraceptive coverage".

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
6. I don't think that is correct
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:23 PM
Feb 2012

The requirement is a minimum package of health services that all employers must offer as part of any health insurance package they offer, not relted to federal funding.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Contraception "contr...