Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsErrors Afflict More Checks Issued to Aid Homeowners
The company the big banks hired to recompense homeowners for mortgage abuses can't seem to get its act together. First it sent out checks without putting money into the account to cover them. Now it's sending out checks for incorrect amounts. Is this incompetence or willful bad acts?
Errors Afflict More Checks Issued to Aid Homeowners
By BEN PROTESS and JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG
May 8, 2013, 3:35 pm 8:58 p.m. | Updated
Three weeks after checks sent to homeowners as compensation for foreclosure abuses were rejected for insufficient funds, the consulting firm at the center of the mishap erred again: a fresh round of checks was written for the wrong amounts.
In recent days, according to officials briefed on the matter, Rust Consulting issued nearly 100,000 checks for less than the homeowners were owed. The mistake potentially cheated consumers out of millions of dollars they were owed under a deal reached between the government and the nations biggest banks.
Federal regulators ordered Rust to fix its mistake. And in a statement, Rust said late Wednesday that it had corrected the error and plans to mail supplemental checks to affected borrowers as soon as May 17. It attributed the mistake to a clerical error.
But the developments cast another harsh spotlight on Rust, which had been selected as the distributor of checks for the $3.6 billion settlement deal that regulators struck with the banks. The continued problems with Rust also raised questions about the governments oversight of the firm and the wisdom of hiring it in the first place.
More: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/in-latest-foreclosure-glitch-some-checks-come-up-short/
By BEN PROTESS and JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG
May 8, 2013, 3:35 pm 8:58 p.m. | Updated
Three weeks after checks sent to homeowners as compensation for foreclosure abuses were rejected for insufficient funds, the consulting firm at the center of the mishap erred again: a fresh round of checks was written for the wrong amounts.
In recent days, according to officials briefed on the matter, Rust Consulting issued nearly 100,000 checks for less than the homeowners were owed. The mistake potentially cheated consumers out of millions of dollars they were owed under a deal reached between the government and the nations biggest banks.
Federal regulators ordered Rust to fix its mistake. And in a statement, Rust said late Wednesday that it had corrected the error and plans to mail supplemental checks to affected borrowers as soon as May 17. It attributed the mistake to a clerical error.
But the developments cast another harsh spotlight on Rust, which had been selected as the distributor of checks for the $3.6 billion settlement deal that regulators struck with the banks. The continued problems with Rust also raised questions about the governments oversight of the firm and the wisdom of hiring it in the first place.
More: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/in-latest-foreclosure-glitch-some-checks-come-up-short/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1151 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Errors Afflict More Checks Issued to Aid Homeowners (Original Post)
csziggy
May 2013
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,709 posts)1. Once is happenstance.....
Twice is coincidence.
Three times is enemy action.
-Auric Goldfinger
csziggy
(34,137 posts)2. Sounds about right
1. Banks made errors in loans and foreclosures.
2. The company selected to pay recompense "forgets" to transfer money to cover their checks to damaged former homeowners.
3. The company selected to pay recompense makes errors in the amounts paid to damaged former homeowners.
Three times, it is!