Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,729 posts)
Tue May 7, 2013, 08:41 PM May 2013

Re: PPP polls on SC-1. I think some questions need to be asked.

On April 21, PPP reported a 9-point lead for Colbert Busch. Two weeks later the race was tied with momentum on Sanford's side. The final result appears to be Sanford +8. Unless someone can point to a pivotal change in the the campaign, I think PPP needs to evaluate how their first poll could be off by so much.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re: PPP polls on SC-1. I think some questions need to be asked. (Original Post) brooklynite May 2013 OP
I think that came out when it was reported he entered his wife's property without permission. hrmjustin May 2013 #1
I think the sample size was too small. aaaaaa5a May 2013 #2
Here is the answer: South Carolina nt winstars May 2013 #3
Sanford changed tactics customerserviceguy May 2013 #4
+1 book_worm May 2013 #5
Polls at the congressional district level are notoriously bad. tritsofme May 2013 #6
Shit happens? premium May 2013 #7
Most polls showed the same thing on April 21. The race closed and then shifted in the last two weeks stevenleser May 2013 #8
During that thime the NRA had its convention and gun legislation was defeated. nt kelliekat44 May 2013 #9
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
1. I think that came out when it was reported he entered his wife's property without permission.
Tue May 7, 2013, 08:44 PM
May 2013

Also people just saw his primary victory speech with the woman who he had an affair with. He had very bad press at that time. What I want to know is how he recovered.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
2. I think the sample size was too small.
Tue May 7, 2013, 08:47 PM
May 2013


Remember this is a house district election. And a small one at that. In the instances of competitive, small house district elections, results are more difficult to tabulate.


This is also an off year election. This means turnout can be difficult to estimate. The last time I looked, only about 19% of registered voters showed up. For Colbert to win, my guess is turnout had to be much higher.



Those are the factors that led to the topsy turvy poll numbers. it should be pointed out that PPP did have the winner correct. And they have reported in recent days that all of the moment was with Sanford. In addition, although Sanford won, I think the race will tighten a bit.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
4. Sanford changed tactics
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:25 PM
May 2013

He ran against the Democratic Congress, that cardboard cutout of Nancy Pelosi reminded voters in that district that no matter how much they disliked cheaters (hey, country music is full of that stuff), they wanted to cling to their guns even more. Philanderers are probably a dime a dozen in that district, anyway, may as well vote for someone who is not going to raise your taxes, steal your guns, or take away your bibles.

My take on it, anyway.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
5. +1
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:28 PM
May 2013

It's a GOP district and voters were coming back to their natural inclination. It's not that hard to understand.

tritsofme

(17,399 posts)
6. Polls at the congressional district level are notoriously bad.
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:30 PM
May 2013

And difficult to conduct, that has more to do with it than anything.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: PPP polls on SC-1. I...