General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNY Times Editorial: Putting Politics Ahead of Science (Plan B)
[font size=1 color="gray"]By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: May 2, 2013[/font]
< . . . >
In 2011, the secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, overruled the Food and Drug Administration, which had decided, based on scientific evidence, that the pills would be safe and appropriate for all females of child-bearing potential. Ms. Sebelius arbitrarily determined that only women 17 and older should have access to the drug.
Then, last month, citing the political nature of Ms. Sebeliuss intervention and finding no coherent justification for it, Judge Edward Korman of United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered the F.D.A. to make emergency contraceptives available over the counter to all women, with no age restrictions.
< . . . >
The administrations continued stubbornness may please some conservative groups critical of the president. But it will hurt girls and women and is bound to undermine Mr. Obamas credibility when he calls for principled, evidence-based policy-making on other issues, like global warming.
The Justice Departments legal argument, moreover, is incoherent. In court documents, it claims that Judge Kormans order improperly interferes with the F.D.A.s scientific judgments pertaining to the drug approval process. But it was Ms. Sebeliuss interference with science that sparked Judge Kormans ruling in the first place.
< . . . >
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . intervened in 2011 to overturn the FDA's determination.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)there were politics when Bush disallowed new stem cell research
there IS politics when guns/bullets are still allowed in the hands of private individuals
there was politics when Jefferson on purpose said women were NOT equal, only men that looked and acted like him.
there are politics involved when there are still draconian republicans, whereas life would be perfect if only President Obama had no opposition in congress and/or especially from people who say they are democratic voters.
the world=politics
pscot
(21,024 posts)I think you two would really hit it off.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)as the subject matter (guns vs. bicycles injuries from gun shots vs. deaths for each) is really not on topic here
Progressive dog
(6,905 posts)It was hard to understand the Sibelius ruling in the first place. How many girls have been harmed by this since 2011? The Obama administration wants to appeal.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)How often in the past five years have we seen democrats at varying levels back off on principle because they were afraid of what the right wing noise machine would portray them?
There is something to be said for political calculation, but not anywhere near as much as the DNC or the President believes. Successful policies will still win votes and can still trump arrack advertising.
Yet, it seems we just don't want to risk setting off the other side, and that's disappointing.