General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGive Guantánamo Back to Cuba
IN the 10 years since the Guantánamo detention camp opened, the anguished debate over whether to shutter the facility or make it permanent has obscured a deeper failure that dates back more than a century and implicates all Americans: namely, our continued occupation of Guantánamo itself. It is past time to return this imperialist enclave to Cuba.
From the moment the United States government forced Cuba to lease the Guantánamo Bay naval base to us, in June 1901, the American presence there has been more than a thorn in Cubas side. It has served to remind the world of Americas long history of interventionist militarism. Few gestures would have as salutary an effect on the stultifying impasse in American-Cuban relations as handing over this coveted piece of land.
The circumstances by which the United States came to occupy Guantánamo are as troubling as its past decade of activity there. In April 1898, American forces intervened in Cubas three-year-old struggle for independence when it was all but won, thus transforming the Cuban War of Independence into what Americans are still wont to call the Spanish-American War. American officials then excluded the Cuban Army from the armistice and denied Cuba a seat at the Paris peace conference. There is so much natural anger and grief throughout the island, the Cuban general Máximo Gómez remarked in January 1899, after the peace treaty was signed, that the people havent really been able to celebrate the triumph of the end of their former rulers power.
More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/opinion/give-guantanamo-back-to-cuba.html?_r=0
In 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt signed a deal with a liberated Cuba to lease the 45-square-mile area. The price: 2,000 gold coins a year. The lease was later renegotiated to stipulate that it could only be canceled by U.S. abandonment or by mutual agreement. And the U.S. still sends checks for some $4,000 a year.
When Fidel Castro came to power in 1959, he indicated he would not abrogate the agreement, but he quickly changed his mind. In 1961, President Eisenhower broke off diplomatic relations and by 1964, Castro was trying to cut off the water supply to Guantanamo. The U.S. started bringing water in by ship.
Periodically, the Havana government demanded the return of the land, and it stopped cashing the rental checks.
But, separated from the rest of Cuba by a well-patrolled fence, the Guantanamo base grew, most recently expanded to provide a prison complex for terrorism suspects.
The Obama administration has been reviewing its relations or nonrelations with Cuba. So here's a modest proposal: How about President Obama announcing that he is ready to end America's century-old presence in the Cuban Bay?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104894738
LeftinOH
(5,354 posts)completely would probably save a few bucks, too.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Dream on.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)But maybe, just maybe the Obama admin doesnt really want to close Gitmo. And no president wants to be that president that gives Guantanamo back to Cuba.
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)When and if it ever changes hands it will be turned over during a rethuglican administration to super rich GOP conglomerates at a bargain basement price. They in turn will make it a mega resort and make boxcar loads of money on the deal. And of course part of the profits will go under the table to the GOP pols who made the deal possible in the first place.