Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:30 PM Apr 2013

Altered Down syndrome student's picture prompts $18M lawsuit

NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) -



A smiling moment for a Middle Tennessee family has turned into a multi-million dollar lawsuit.

The picture of a man with Down syndrome taken in 2004 was repeatedly altered and posted online, prompting the lawsuit.

In the picture, Adam Holland is smiling big for the camera. The picture shows Holland and a picture he drew during for an art class at the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center.

The class was for those with developmental disabilities.

"He's a very likable, very presentable young man who I don't think fully appreciates the hurt that's been inflicted on him," said Holland's attorney Larry Crain.

Holland was 19 when he proudly held up his work of art. The picture was posted to the web but nearly a decade later it has become something else.

http://www.wsmv.com/story/22104625/altered-down-syndrome-students-picture-prompts-18m-lawsuit

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Altered Down syndrome student's picture prompts $18M lawsuit (Original Post) The Straight Story Apr 2013 OP
Who are they suing? LiberalAndProud Apr 2013 #1
Cox media for one The Straight Story Apr 2013 #2
Ouch. This is a tough one. Xithras Apr 2013 #3
Uhh that is not edited. trumad Apr 2013 #4
Yes, it is. Xithras Apr 2013 #6
really? trumad Apr 2013 #9
Beat me to it! I was just thinking of the Moran guy. msanthrope Apr 2013 #5
The bigger question then arises: Could he spell Plaintiff? Katashi_itto Apr 2013 #8
I have never seen this meme Capt. Obvious Apr 2013 #7
It used to show up here: The Straight Story Apr 2013 #10
This part sounds a little strange. NCTraveler Apr 2013 #11

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
2. Cox media for one
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:44 PM
Apr 2013

Crain said the Hollands found one of those images on a Florida radio station web site.

Another was on a Flickr web site was posted by a realtor in the Minneapolis area.

The director of communication at the Cox Media radio station named in the lawsuit said the company is looking into the matter. They said it's their policy not to comment on ongoing litigation.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
3. Ouch. This is a tough one.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:48 PM
Apr 2013

On one hand, I can see how having your image pulled into an Internet meme could be hurtful and humiliating, and you can bet that I'd be calling my lawyers if my own image were ever used that way. On the other hand, I don't like the idea of suing someone just because they shared a funny meme image they found on Facebook.

Should someone be able to sue another for editing and sharing their photo in a hurtful or embarassing way? What if this guy decided to sue me or DU because I posted this image:

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
6. Yes, it is.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 02:03 PM
Apr 2013

I'm quite certain that mocking text along the bottom wasn't there in the original. Even if the guy wasn't humiliated by the original photo, I'm sure that one of the hundreds of variations that mocked him or made him the butt of jokes would have done so.

So...should it be cause for legal action?

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
9. really?
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 02:16 PM
Apr 2013

His picture wasn't edited.... if the actual picture is edited then perhaps...his wasn't.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
5. Beat me to it! I was just thinking of the Moran guy.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:55 PM
Apr 2013

He could sue us all blind but then again he have to admit to being the plaintiff.





 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
11. This part sounds a little strange.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 02:30 PM
Apr 2013

"Crain said some of the other images they found were so derogatory he couldn't even include them in the lawsuit."

I don't see why they wouldn't be added. Maybe they could not be attached to an organization with deep pockets?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Altered Down syndrome stu...