Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BillyJack

(819 posts)
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:53 AM Apr 2013

Army Says No To More Tanks, But Congress Insists

WASHINGTON (AP) — Built to dominate the enemy in combat, the Army's hulking Abrams tank is proving equally hard to beat in a budget battle.

Lawmakers from both parties have devoted nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money over the past two years to build improved versions of the 70-ton Abrams.

But senior Army officials have said repeatedly, "No thanks."

"When an institution as risk averse as the Defense Department says they have enough tanks, we can probably believe them," Kennedy said.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=179606996

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Army Says No To More Tanks, But Congress Insists (Original Post) BillyJack Apr 2013 OP
Here's the LBN thread on this Electric Monk Apr 2013 #1
Original name for the MIC was MICC. The first C was for Congress... Keeping that pork coming. freshwest Apr 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Army Says No To More Tank...