Bipartisan negotiations ongoing to exempt Congress/aides from Obamacare
I'm sure this won't look bad at all.
Congress: Obamacare For Thee, But Not For Me?
No sense in denying it. Politico won the primetime last night with a breathtaking story about Congressional hypocrisy. The articles here. The nub of it is that Democrats and Republicans are supposedly, and secretly, trying to exempt lawmakers and their aides from Obamacare. Back in 2009, when the bill was in its infancy, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) introduced an amendment to effectively require members and staffs to obtain their insurance on the exchanges just like your average Joe whose employer doesnt provide health benefits. It passed, for reasons which should be politically obvious. Now members want a mulligan.
Ezra Klein burrows into the specifics and lets these supposedly scheming members of Congress off the hook. All thats happening, he reports, is that members are trying to figure out a way for Congress to continue contributing to employee premiums.
Were still burrowing down into the specifics ourselves, because we want to give everyone a completely fair shake, without lapsing into credulity. But at first glance, and then after some initial reporting, I think the truth is somewhere in between.
Congressional leaders dont appear to be trying to repeal the Grassley amendment. As Ezra writes, theyre investigating whether theres a way for the federal government, which employs Congressional aides, to continue helping folks on the Hill afford insurance.
But that in and of itself violates the spirit, if not the letter, of Grassleys amendment.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/04/congress_obamacare_for_thee_but_not_for_me.php?ref=fpblg
The brain-drain defense is being used - that Congress will lose all the smarts and congress critters can't be expected to write their own bills.