General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama: George W. Bush 'Loves This Country And Loves Its People'
Source: TPM
President Obama on Wednesday at a Democratic fundraiser in Dallas applauded former President George W. Bush on the eve of the opening of his presidential library.
"Im really looking forward to attending the Bush library opening tomorrow," Obama said, according to a White House pool report. "One of the things I will insist upon is whatever our political differences, President Bush loves this country and loves its people and shares that same concern, and was concerned about all people in America, not just those who voted Republican. I think thats true about him and I think thats true about most of us.
Obama also promised to continue his charm offensive aimed at Republicans. "Occasionally I may make some of you angry because Im going to reach out to Republicans and Im going to keep on doing it, Obama said, according to the report. Even if some of you think Im a sap, Im going to keep on doing it because thats what I think the country needs.
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obama-bush-loves-this-country-loves-its-people
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)lastlib
(23,226 posts)and all three suck the blood out of the object of their love. Bush and his neo-con allies are blood-suckers, pure and simple.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)babylonsister
(171,065 posts)I imagine he gagged just a bit.
man4allcats
(4,026 posts)While he may not have been able to comment in the manner he might have wished to, kissing ass is both unnecessary and uncalled for.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)between the Clintons and the Bushes, nothing about our phony 'democracy' shocks me anymore.
We are on our own. And to think we once thought there was even a remote chance of the Bush war criminals being brought to justice.
How naive we were.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)the NEW America wherein often D=R=I in matters of $$$$$. I really don't think many Americans have any clue of how far removed they are from the ruling elite be it corporations, politicians and/or religions. ... often guppies and lemmings ...
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Even at a Democratic event.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)Cha
(297,220 posts)UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)He meant every word of that.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'd expect no different.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)I'm not sure about the charm part but it sure as hell is offensive to me.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)or some lower-ranking official to represent the White House at this contrived event.
JEB
(4,748 posts)of the G.W. Bush sewage treatment facility.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Ron Green
(9,822 posts)The abused keeps reaching out to the abuser.
The children suffer.
JEB
(4,748 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Who, in turned, consumed the largesse, got all of the tax breaks, stole all of the wealth, killed our soldiers and Iraqi citizens by the cemetery-load, burned America's workers, torched their progress and dreams of a retirement and left US with the BILL.
So fuck him and fuck anyone who defends this war criminal or the laissez-fail capitalism we're yoked with. George Dubya Bewsh and his Administration should be in the HAGUE.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)Really...stop the lovin' guys. I don't think we can suvive any more of your kind of love.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I guess I should have made that clear.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)criminal, lucky to not be in prison.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)benefit of 'making the Left angry'.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)for the Left? Not even the Left but all the Democrats who voted for him to undo the damage Bush did.
Is he losing it? Something has snapped inside him? I can't make sense out of his need to make such a statement. But, it's very worrisome since we have close to four more years of this.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Reagan was either his hero or roll model, I've forgotten which. But, either way, that stunned me to hear it. Reagan was an unmitigated disaster for which America continues to pay dearly. I'm afraid that our President is a closet Republican who ran as a Democrat for expediency's sake.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He said that Reagan's presidency was transformational. And, that he also hoped to be a transformational president.
Haters jumped on it and assumed he meant he wanted to be like Reagan, when he never claimed he wanted to go in the same direction.
I swear people look for reasons to be angry at the president.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)it clear during the primaries of 2008 and the early days of his Presidency that Reagan was a person that should be emulated.
"As early as the Democratic primary in the winter of 2008, then-candidate Obama proffered Ronald Reagan as a role model to be emulated much to the Clintons chagrin should he capture the White House. I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not, he confessed to reporters during the Nevada primary an admission that nearly came back to haunt him with Democratic voters.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/02/05/reagan-obama-big-difference-presidents/#ixzz2RUf7ObDe
"
You, in my opinion, are just parsing words to defend Obama.
I am a person that voted for Obama. I preferred him to Hillary because he opposed the Iraq invasion. I was thrilled that he was elected the first time and also when he defeated Romney.
But, I haven't had to "search for reasons" to disapprove of his policies. I had search for things to be happy about.
You apparently think he is great. Think what you wish.
I am terribly disappointed with his performance and will be happy when we elect a President that seems to be for the mainstream Americans.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)It's not necessary...
"I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not,
Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, W, and Obama were all on a track that has followed the Reagan admin. Obama wants to be a transformational president that changes the trajectory.
As in getting off the Reagan train. How exactly is wanting to change the trajectory emulating the content of Reagan's policies?
I have been disappointed with the CCPI, but am not so intellectually dishonest as to claim that I know he wants to be like Reagan because he may do something I really really don't want him to do.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)pointed assertion that I, unlike you, am an "intellectually dishonest" person claiming that Obama is emulating Reagan because he is making policy with which I don't agree.
Please read the following sentences carefully if you want to understand my beliefs.
I am disappointed with Obama's performance as President. I don't know or care who he might be emulating. I will be glad when we have a Democratic President who seems to be standing up for the majority of Americans.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)not necessary. Obama's sounding like a broken record.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)must we slam him for being gracious and being bigger than we are? The man and his family are under constant threats of being harmed, he has the weight of this dysfunctional government on his shoulders and a citizenry that only bitches and complains but adds nothing resolving or solving our problems and we can't even give him credit for a few moments of human decency...Wow!!
President Obama, I don't agree with every decision that you make but I highly respect you and appreciate your decency.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)Has he been reading comic books from the 50's? "Sap?" Or was it just a Freudian Slip?
This comment from TPM'er at the site seems to be appropriate reply:
Stoneyjack 4 hours ago
Pathetic, pandering Obama looks forward to the day when he, Dubya & Zipper Bill can walk the links arm in arm, chuckling & reminiscing.
tritsofme
(17,377 posts)Outrageous.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Unless of course you don't think lying a country into a wrong war, instituting torture as a policy, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people are not war crimes. I guess all war criminals claim to 'love their countries'. I can think of a few others who have made that claim also. But, they didn't get away with it.
If you believe Bush loves this country, and I imagine you wouldn't say it if you didn't mean it as that would be lying, then you also don't believe the US CAN commit war crimes. Sorry but I don't subscribe to that theory and could never, ever be in the same room with any war criminal where I am expected to pay homage to him/her.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)who was born with a silver spoon up his ass and he hates middle-class America."
Would that be more to your liking? Should the President have said that?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)administration, the torture memos, the collapse of the economy, etc etc. Then he would not be in a position of having to praise any war criminals, they would be busy trying to defend themselves instead of building libraries with obscene amounts of money. Nixon who in retrospect, is beginning to look good compared to gang of criminals, at least had to leave office. But I guess we still had some standards back then. Not nearly enough, or his cohorts Cheney and Rumsfeld et al would have never again managed to get so close to the WH.
But we are now beginning to accept the sad state of our democracy, which in many ways is better than the false hopes we had during the Bush years, that we actually did still have any standards at all. Now maybe we can begin to rethink what to do about it. We have failed, spectacularly as today's obscene 'show' clearly demonstrates.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)with what he said at the library dedication?
You perpetually outraged wacko birds are all missing the central point: WHAT SHOULD PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA HAVE SAID AT THE DEDICATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FOR HIS PREDECESSOR?
Number23
(24,544 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)U.S. Engaged in Torture After 9/11, Review Concludes
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/world/us-practiced-torture-after-9-11-nonpartisan-review-concludes.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
I never cease to be amazed at the level of childishness and hate express at this place.
We could use a few more adult voices.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)He pokes stick in eyes of Dems who voted for him and says he will keep doing it and those shocked by that are being childish and full of hate? It seems PBO has a disdain for "some of his voters" that he can't keep quiet about. In fact he says he's going to keep doing what has bothered them. Like "Chained CPI" for the Old Folks where he works with Repugs. He's gonna keep doing it. And Fracking...he's gonna keep doing it, Killing innocents as collateral damage with his Drones...he's gonna keep on doing it...Trade Agreements like TPP/EURO....he's gonna keep on doing it...Trans Canadian Pipeline...he's gonna keep on doing it...
===============
Even if some of you think Im a sap, Im going to keep on doing it because thats what I think the country needs.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)it is not unexpected.
PufPuf23
(8,776 posts)rather tha rub salt in the wounds.
Obama protects and panders to war and financial criminals.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I am quite frankly disappointed and disgusted by this comment.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I sometimes think some of us are stuck in junior high...
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I'd like him to toss his murdering ass in prison for crimes against humanity instead of attending a ceremony honoring the bastard. In a sane world, this would happen. Unfortunately, we live in anything but that.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Wow.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I am suggesting it would be a horrible idea.
Remember what a wonderful, uniting time Clinton's impeachment proceedings brought? Nixon's Watergate hearings? Multiply that times ten. Obama would be viewed as a vengeful opportunist, and it would be decades before we saw another Democrat in the White House.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)People were against Clinton's impeachment because they recognized it as the partisan sham it was. On the other hand, any investigations into Chimp-boy's presidency would be completely justified and any criminal charges against him would be fully supported by the American people once all the facts are revealed.
Doing the right thing shouldn't be a decision made based on what is popular or because of fear of some possible political consequence that I personally doubt would even happen. The man led 4000 Americans to their deaths over a lie. Maybe some people just want to sweep that under the rug and let it go but I'm definitely not among them.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)You're saying absolution is a rational national policy?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Someone is calling for absolution?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)In effect, that's what the policy is.
: the act of absolving; specifically : a remission of sins pronounced by a priest (as in the sacrament of reconciliation)
See absolution defined for English-language learners »
See absolution defined for kids »
Examples of ABSOLUTION
He asked the priest to give him absolution for his sins.
<the jury's verdict of not guilty was absolution in the eyes of the law, but the verdict would always be guilty in the court of public opinion>
First Known Use of ABSOLUTION
13th century
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)This is absurd. Typical for DU, but absurd nevertheless.
When you get caught trying to pawn off ridiculous hyperbole, simply back off. Don't make it worse by acting like this.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)If you think opinion expressed on DU is typically absurd and hyperbolic, why do you stick around? There are other places, like the National Review Online and perhaps The New Republic where "serious people" rule and the idea of prosecuting Presidents for conducting optional wars is never seriously entertained. You do want to be considered a "Serious Person", don't you? Seriously.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Some big name lawyer (Shapiro?) tried to indict George W. Bush in Vermont on 3000 counts of murder; that would be a place to start.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 25, 2013, 01:28 PM - Edit history (1)
He didn't need to poke stick in eyes of what he refers to as "some" Democrats who voted for him by saying this. And, what President calls himself "a sap?" It's truly undignified.
Even if some of you think Im a sap, Im going to keep on doing it because thats what I think the country needs. "
democrank
(11,094 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)I'll be darned.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)"One of the things I will insist upon is whatever our political differences, President Bush loves this country and loves its people and shares that same concern, and was concerned about all people in America, not just those who voted Republican. I think thats true about him and I think thats true about most of us.
I saw no evidence during the Bush years that this was true.
I think his administration went out of it's way to hurt Democratic voters.
As for "loving his country", he almost loved it to death.
Kim Jong Un and Bashar el-Assad also love their countries.
Blue Owl
(50,373 posts)It was their way or the highway.
Clearly Pres. Obama is reading off the money party's script here...
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)That's why he made so many of them.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)No Republican will ever, ever declare that you loved our country. When you open your library, the teabillies will spit on it.
What you need to worry about is if the progressives will spit on it as well.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)At least that seems to be the consensus.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)The Bewsh Admin should be thrown in the Hague and STARVED.
We also need to get over and ABOLISH this notion that America is ALWAYS the Good Guy. NO we're fucking not.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)We must act mature here and honor this man, because we equate maturity with being nice and quite and polite at all times, no matter what. You see, it is more about proving how decent we are than acknowledging and deploring the sheer contempt for us that George W. revealed while he catered to the interests of the Neocon agenda.
That kind of maturity reminds me of how you must behave in a 1st-grade classroom as you are molded to accept and even relish in the kind of behavior a war criminal indulges in.
So, he get's away with it and this is a nice time to remember how mature we should be about it, of course. The Status Quo is far more important than decimated veterans, and the lists of results we have to bear the burden of as a society thanks to people like George W. and his partners in crime.
That's infamy, not something to honor. Yes, these are thought crimes so I shall desist and go to room 101 for some therapy now.
Victory Gin for all! The library is open.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)at a Presidential Library dedication.
babylonsister
(171,065 posts)Any opportunity to lambast Obama is happily accepted by so many.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)smash-and-grab ala' austerity (shock doctrine/disaster capitalism), then yes. Bullshit is bullshit, is all.
Note: The Bush disaster family are among those buying up the world's largest aquifers in a bid for hydraulic empirism.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The Boston bombing last week knocked all of their standard outrage topics right out of the news. So their outrage has been trapped and building up inside them.
If they didn't have this opportunity to release some of their endless outrage, some of them would explode.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but still it's gag worthy.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... defends misunderstood bad cop.
It's all a game folks.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Then he said Bin Laden didn't matter.
Gin
(7,212 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Yet, this is exactly what I expect - Obama to be nice no matter what. I know I wouldn't be.
Initech
(100,075 posts)Let's look at how many people died on his watch:
- 4000+ on 9/11. Bush ignored clear and concise warnings that an attack on American soil was imminent.
- 3000+ when Hurricane Katrina hit. Had the Republican party not lobbied for deregulation a decade earlier the levees would not have leaked.
- Over 4500+ in two unnecessary wars, not to mention the countless Iraqi and Afghan civilians that were killed so the BFEE and their criminal friends could loot the national treasury.
Bush loves people? Think again.
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
librechik
(30,674 posts)I know that seems impossible to someone like you. But it's true.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)True love, like in Psycho.
zeeland
(247 posts)It was a robocall from some group called Republican something or other.
it was yesterday from this #202-810-0485. So while Obama is blowing smoke up
Republican ass they are trying to organize an impeachment. Yes, I think you
are acting like a sap Mr. President.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It works both ways.
Bush will show up at Obama's dedication to his own library and say nice things, and Republicans will skewer Bush for doing it.
I take no issue with Obama's thoughts on Bush.
JEB
(4,748 posts)comment on the war criminal's sentencing. Their is no Hope for this country.
ellie
(6,929 posts)makes me believe it is a lie.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)deeply. But GW Bush's solutions for making the country a better place to live were grossly misguided.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)seriously - it is simply the correct role of the sitting President at such an event to say nice things .. to do anything less would be seen as crude
mick063
(2,424 posts)The problem is that times have changed.
Our President is vilified by the Tea Party in every way imaginable. The Republican Party walks lock step with them as well as major media outlets.
The Robber Barons are stealing from all of us. ALEC is shaping our country into a profit centric monster. It is now acceptable to teach impressionable 4th graders that Jesus rode a dinosaur. Women deserve rape because of their attire. The once untouchable public sector collective bargaining is being systematically crushed. Extremist Supreme Court Justices are allowing our Democracy to be sold to the highest bidder. Nation building is a credible foreign policy. Trade agreements are rapidly expanding unspeakable working conditions abroad. It is criminal to use the term vagina but acceptable to probe them. Low level appointees are being needlessly filibustered. Sequestration is a miserable compromise.
Let me make this clear. Bush did not love our country. Bush was a facilitator in rapidly changing our country in to a nightmare.
There is no high ground anymore. The right redefined the rules. Now is not the time to play nice because the future of this country is on the line.
Now is the time to take on a "Tea Party" like personality. Now is the time to become the crude assholes. They are not playing nice anymore. We cannot afford to play under a different rule set. Compassionate Conservatism was thrown in the dumpster.
Stop coddling the dipshits that are destroying our nation!!!!!!
Arkana
(24,347 posts)It's one of those "close your eyes and think of England/baseball/whatever" moments.
flvegan
(64,407 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)What does he think he'll accomplish by praising every leading conservative on the planet as a "true champion of liberty" and "great friend of America"? Tea and sympathy?
gordianot
(15,238 posts)They were both there at the same time.
His praise of George W. Bush is the same man who in public asked for an aide to give him a hand cleaner after he first shook hands with Barack Obama.
Barack Obama has some issues cozying up to those who truly hate him.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)but after eight years of lies and distortion who should be reaching out to who?