Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Klukie

(2,237 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:27 PM Apr 2013

Local Tea Party is tying Common Core Standards to Agenda 21 conspiracy

I live in Pennsylvania and our state has adopted the Common Core Standards. Our school district is in the process of realigning curriculum to meet the expectations of the CC. A local tea party group is preparing to hold a meeting to discuss the CC and it's relation to Agenda 21. I was wondering if any educators out there have any thoughts on this matter.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Local Tea Party is tying Common Core Standards to Agenda 21 conspiracy (Original Post) Klukie Apr 2013 OP
Glenn Beck has them all riled up over this ZRT2209 Apr 2013 #1
I kind of figured he was involved when I looked up Agenda 21 Klukie Apr 2013 #2
I also live in PA and never heard of Agenda 21 until reading this post. femmocrat Apr 2013 #3
Yes, Murciélago Guano Loco Viking12 Apr 2013 #4
Good, at least somebody in your neighborhood is standing up to CC MadHound Apr 2013 #5
Thanks for responding to this Klukie Apr 2013 #6
Read some education blogs. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #7
Ravitch declared her opposition to Common Core in February Simian20 Aug 2013 #8

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
3. I also live in PA and never heard of Agenda 21 until reading this post.
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:24 PM
Apr 2013

Sounds like right wing, bat-shit paranoia to me. People love being whipped into a frenzy, don't they?

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
5. Good, at least somebody in your neighborhood is standing up to CC
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:48 PM
Apr 2013

Sorry, I don't believe in Agenda 21 or any of that nonsense, but as a teacher I find CC, along with RTTT and other such education initiatives over the past thirteen years to be counter productive, and actually destructive to public education. Common Core is simply another tool that is going to be used to further tear down public education.

The sad thing is, while liberals hated No Child Left Behind, in part because it was a Bush administration program, some are now embracing RTTT and CC because, while equally destructive to public education, they were proposed by the Obama administration.

Which leaves the RW whackos, teachers, and a relative few liberals to defend public education from these ongoing assaults.

Klukie

(2,237 posts)
6. Thanks for responding to this
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:37 AM
Apr 2013

Can you tell me what you don't like about CC. I have a 2nd and a 4th grader and I am trying to understand all of the changes.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. Read some education blogs.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:49 AM
Apr 2013
http://dianeravitch.net/category/common-core/


The tea party disliking common core doesn't mean common core is good.

jeb bush likes common core.

it's an education deform thing.

Simian20

(12 posts)
8. Ravitch declared her opposition to Common Core in February
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 09:02 AM
Aug 2013

She opposes the Common Core (CCSS) on state autonomy reasons, and that so far it's not working out well.
Just because the right argues some points we do too doesn't make it wrong. Don't many of us support Rep. Barr for government surveillance or Rand Paul for his opposition to rampant military encroachment abroad?
"Why I Cannot Support the Common Core Standards"
http://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/26/why-i-cannot-support-the-common-core-standards/
On state autonomy grounds. The Congress passed a law ESEA, 1965, which included a position against authority for a national curriculum.

"I have long advocated for voluntary national standards, believing that it would be helpful to states and districts to have general guidelines about what students should know and be able to do as they progress through school.

"Such standards, I believe, should be voluntary, not imposed by the federal government; before implemented widely, they should be thoroughly tested to see how they work in real classrooms; and they should be free of any mandates that tell teachers how to teach because there are many ways to be a good teacher, not just one. I envision standards not as a demand for compliance by teachers, but as an aspiration defining what states and districts are expected to do. They should serve as a promise that schools will provide all students the opportunity and resources to learn reading and mathematics, the sciences, the arts, history, literature, civics, geography, and physical education, taught by well-qualified teachers, in schools led by experienced and competent educators."

She then talks about how the Common Core is untested:
"After much deliberation, I have come to the conclusion that I can’t wait five or ten years to find out whether test scores go up or down, whether or not schools improve, and whether the kids now far behind are worse off than they are today.

"I have come to the conclusion that the Common Core standards effort is fundamentally flawed by the process with which they have been foisted upon the nation.

"The Common Core standards have been adopted in 46 states and the District of Columbia without any field test. They are being imposed on the children of this nation despite the fact that no one has any idea how they will affect students, teachers, or schools. We are a nation of guinea pigs, almost all trying an unknown new program at the same time."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Local Tea Party is tying ...