Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKeystone Pipeline Will Create Only 35 Permanent Jobs, Emit 51 Coal Plants Worth Of Carbon
On Wednesday, Secretary of State John Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that he wasnt touching the Keystone pipeline decision with a ten-foot pole:
I am staying as far away from that as I can now so that when the appropriate time comes to me, I am not getting information from any place I shouldnt be, and I am not getting engaged in the debate at a time that I shouldnt be, Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday.
Right now, Kerry has the State Departments Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, but if that is all he information he relies on, he wont get the full picture. While he will see that the project will only bring 35 permanent jobs, which is true, he would also see almost no discussion of the pipelines impact on the climate. (Oddly, he will be able to read an extended discussion of climate changes projected impacts on the construction and maintenance of the proposed pipeline.)
So where is a Secretary of State sincerely concerned about climate change to go to find the climate consequences of approving the Keystone XL pipeline? He could peruse a new report out yesterday from Oil Change International called: Cooking the Books: How The State Department Analysis Ignores The True Climate Impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
I am staying as far away from that as I can now so that when the appropriate time comes to me, I am not getting information from any place I shouldnt be, and I am not getting engaged in the debate at a time that I shouldnt be, Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday.
Right now, Kerry has the State Departments Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, but if that is all he information he relies on, he wont get the full picture. While he will see that the project will only bring 35 permanent jobs, which is true, he would also see almost no discussion of the pipelines impact on the climate. (Oddly, he will be able to read an extended discussion of climate changes projected impacts on the construction and maintenance of the proposed pipeline.)
So where is a Secretary of State sincerely concerned about climate change to go to find the climate consequences of approving the Keystone XL pipeline? He could peruse a new report out yesterday from Oil Change International called: Cooking the Books: How The State Department Analysis Ignores The True Climate Impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
The rest:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/17/1885621/keystone-pipeline-will-create-only-35-permanent-jobs-emit-51-coal-plants-worth-of-carbon/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 549 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keystone Pipeline Will Create Only 35 Permanent Jobs, Emit 51 Coal Plants Worth Of Carbon (Original Post)
Triana
Apr 2013
OP
byeya
(2,842 posts)1. Very informative post. I had no idea the stats were so awful.
So, we're about to let a foreign country throw people off their land(or degrade it) to ship a nasty goo to Louisiana and Texas for refining to then export it all the while encouraging more C02 to be dumped into our atmosphere while taking the risks of more petro spills.
Doesn't sound like a good deal for the USA & its people to me.
Triana
(22,666 posts)2. It's only a good deal for oil companies & the Koch brothers...
...who also have interest in Canadian tar sands.