General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCarville: I Think Obama Likes Angering Liberals
I think he likes that, Carville said. I dont think hes upset. He got a very favorable Washington Post editorial. Morning Joe, very favorable commentary right here. I guarantee you if hes up watching this right now. Got a good David Brooks column. Hes kind of excited this morning. This is kind of important to him.
More:
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/carville-i-think-obama-likes-upsetting-liberals-video
what's even funnier to kpete, is that Carville thinks he's becoming relevant once again, Mary is sure to follow...................kp
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)& has-beens back in front of the cameras again. Not looking forward to that at all. I don't think Hillary has any idea how much these people hurt her the first time. I hope she'll be much wiser in choosing who represents her in the media this time.
Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 12, 2013, 01:38 PM - Edit history (1)
Neo-Liberalism abandoned governmental Due Process requirements. It was a lawless era that destroyed public trust.
I'm certainly not looking forward to a repeat.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)which is corporate purchase of the system, by making the conversation into juicy armchair psychology of one man.
Rex
(65,616 posts)The millionaire/billionaire sunset crowd sits and pretend they understand normal people that have actual daily crisis like picking between 'gas in car' or 'lunch'.
This is why I turned off the M$M years ago...watching the plutocrats pretend is for those that like to be fooled or played for a fool.
Marr
(20,317 posts)He hasn't done anything that isn't systematically pushed 24-7 on these corporate outlets.
Rex
(65,616 posts)like NASCAR and so should ALL snake charm salesmen. At least we would instantly know which groceries we would be boycotting or buying at the store and REALLY ain't that all that matters to them anyway? They destroyed our fun and got commercials pushed onto us on the Internets - - - what did we get back in return? Pron? Been there longer than ads.
Nothing, we get nothing from them but ashes and furious wind.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)and he can pull out lines that make him sound like "Mr. Homespun" ...but, he and Begalla did some nasty campaign work in South America and elsewhere. And, they do it elsewhere. They are "Great Talking Spin artists. And, the best in the business. Carville is particularly good I think because he always gets a profound kernal of truth into his spin that resonates with Democrats. He suckered me in for the Clinton years. Wasn't until I woke up to all the De-Regulation Clinton achieved that I realized that you always have to watch what the one hand is doing behind the back rather than the hand that is waving at you to make their point.
I think Begalla is working with a Dem Group again. Maybe it's on an Obama initiative ....so I suspect they have a candidate in mind for 2016.
Skittles
(153,156 posts)and it won't help us to SOFTEN REPUBLICANS!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2661227
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Professional shill. Makes his own rules.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Because President Obama doesn't have a big ego, and knows the easiest way to ensure everything on his agenda is passed, is to have 16 or more years to do it.
His agenda needs to be continued and Hillary will continue it.
President Obama is never one to gloat or whine. He just does
I believe he will also be one of the 5 greatest US supreme court justices, and would finally be a suitable replacement for Thurgood Marshall, probably around 2018-19.
Then he can put a seal of approval on every single wonderful thing he has done, and will be done in the following 8 years.
I don't know any president who picked such a wonderful first term staff either.
It was a major stroke of understanding and genius to pick Hillary Clinton (his replacement as President in 2017 to 2025), to get past the problem past times have had.
That being a continuation of more than 2 terms is needed.
Rev. Martin Luther King would be proud of Barack Obama
Jerry Brown is Proud of Barack Obama
LBJ would be proud of Barack Obama
FDR would be proud of Barack Obama
Lincoln would be proud of Barack Obama
Ted Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Jack Kennedy would be proud of Barack Obama
Mike Dukakis would be proud of Barack Obama
Bella Abzug would be proud of Barack Obama
Tom Daschlie IS proud of Barack Obama
Caroline Kennedy is proud of Barack Obama
Rev. Jackson is proud of Barack Obama
Rev. Al Sharpton is proud of Barack Obama
Jackie Robinson would be proud of Barack Obama
Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are proud of Barack Obama
Anybody who is anybody would be proud of Barack Obama
Personally, I am proud to live in a country and wake up every day to have Barack Obama as President.
Both sets of my late grandparents would be very, very ,very proud of Barack Obama
Nelson Mandela is proud of Barack Obama
Muhamad Ali is proud of Barack Obama
and Bill and Hillary Clinton and the others (who were able to achieve Bill's unbelievable upset in 1992 over Bush41, are proud and part of the same wanting to continue.
imho of course.
in conclusion
What makes Hillary look good, Makes Obama's agenda continue.
The agenda is what is important. The individual is just the vessel for the agenda.
President Obama being the #4 president already, is assured in 75 or 100 years of that monument where Lincoln, Washington, Jefferson, King, LBJ have one
What will be greater is that his agenda will still be going strong 100-200-300 years from now
Remembered as Lincoln is remembered as one of the greatest ever.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)they should be thanking us, we're making their guy's day.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)relevence in a world where no one cares what he and his wife think. I wish the two of them would leave us all alone.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)but, he's good at what he does and if he's working for Hillary he'd definitely use an insight about Obama for his own purpose. He might shade it a little...but, he wouldn't outright LIE like the Repug Campaign Operatives do. He's too smart a fox to outright lie. Carville probably has several "insiders" in the Obama White House Staff. He and Begalla are wired into the Dem Establishment. So...a little truth...shaded a bit for whoever their next candidate will be who will find them.
Sorry to be so cynical ....but, long time observing them in action during the Clinton years.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)He sees that as the best way to get back into the big money of political consulting...
Cleita
(75,480 posts)have pillow talk and she is an influence.
However, I do wonder why pissing off liberals does not seem to affect the President.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Why shouldn't he be pleased?
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)monmouth3
(3,871 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)and unrealistic. You can't let yourself be affected by irrational people.
Skittles
(153,156 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)That's all you got? Irrational, ad hominem and not going to soften one Republican whatsoever.
Skittles
(153,156 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)I give a fuck about making sure the President is an unhappy thwarted centrist until the day he moves left and abandons whatever "I'm the President for conservatives too" bullshit that has taken root between his ears. Any centrist or right-of-center proposal should be and seems to be DOA because he loses the left of his party and can't gain a single vote from the other side of the aisle.
Earth to Obama: The Democratic left are the ones you need to placate. David Brooks and Joe Scarsborough don't have votes in Congress and can't make Boehner's or McConnell's cronies support your crap ideas on the deficit, Social Security or the next "give away the farm" idiocy that falls out of your mouth. If Hillary's actually planning on running, she best learn that lesson too and start her transformation to a liberal hero.
Rex
(65,616 posts)This is why even though I have no one on ignore, I still will ignore some of the posters here...they simply have a different agenda then us and want to waste our time with non-starter threads and posts. And I think I know why too.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)slice of fudge
Autumn
(45,066 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Remember his initial round of cabinet picks? It was basically a neon sign saying, "Fuck you liberals, I'm with Wall Street". That attitude toward people on the left has been a constant with this administration.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)a backlash were the tip off, definitely. Along with his appointments.. That any of us had much hope after that shows that we are just hopeful Dems...and we were desperate after Bush. We were putty in whatever hands besides a Repugs ...were waiting to capture us.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)green for victory
(591 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)warning.
As for the President wanting to get creds from Republicans by angering the left, we knew that already. And we don't care. Because this isn't about him getting creds from Republicans, James, it is about the lives of millions of Americans.
The good thing about the anger he has generated this time is that we now have no more reason to give him the benefit of the doubt. So thanks for yet another confirmation of what we were hoping was not true.
This frees the left now to move forward, unburdened by the need to 'wait and see' what he might do.
The job we have to do is monumental because of our mistake of 'waiting to see' when in our hearts we knew we were being scammed.
Now we have to start with the primaries in 2014. He has done one good thing, he has united the Left and motivated them like no one else could have.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)It's gotta go way beyond just electing "More and Better Dems." In some states with the gerrymandering, redistricting there isn't going to be anything but another DINO Dem elected. There's a chance some change comearound the edges if there was an angry backlash against programs Repugs are pushing through in so many Blue/Purple states.. But how do we deal with Dem anger against Obama to motivate getting voters out.
We don't have anyone "waiting in the wings" as an emerging candidate yet. Some say Hillary, others say Elizabeth Warren. But, there must be someone else who is disgusted with both Dems and Repugs performance who has Principles, Character, Backbone and Charisma plus independent back of some kind that isn't tainted by Wall Street, Military Industrial Complex or Petersen/Koch/Heritage Foundation, etc.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I could support Sanders/Warren in a heartbeat.
Sam
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)and tired of being taken for granted. They know that it is the liberals that are their base and they always vote, no matter what.