General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHawking: people will become extinct on Earth within the millennium.
Speaking at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles the 71-year-old scientist called for further exploration of space to guarantee the future of mankind, the Belfast Telegraph reports.
"We must continue to go into space for humanity. If you understand how the universe operates, you control it in a way," Professor Hawking said, adding that "we won't survive another 1,000 years without escaping our fragile planet."
http://rt.com/news/earth-hawking-mankind-escape-702/
What do you think? Is his timeline is too long?
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)Humans are very adaptable to rapid change. We're bad at long term change. But I have no doubt some portion of humanity will find a way to survive the next 87 years. There's too damn many of us to go extinct that rapidly.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)fear I am.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The phone keeps ringing and THE CALLS ARE COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE!
Drale
(7,932 posts)I think the human race is very resilient and we will survive pretty much anything. Now that's not to say that there will not be a huge die off but humanity will survive
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and most of life on Earth, like 99%, has already gone extinct. I am talking of the whole 4.5 Billion years of history, not just the modern geological era.
Another fun fact. we are in the middle of the Great Holocene Extinction, top species (we are) tend not to survive those.
Oh and race is a term I have a problem with.
Now humans might EVOLVE into something else, like all life on Earth has done, but quite frankly changes are moving way too fast with the environment.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)Our civilization might come in for rough times, both natural and man made, but the species is bright enough to subsist even if we face a civilizational collapse.
Extinction is a strong word barring some cataclysmic natural event.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)I do occasionally worry about Yellowstone going off or an Apophis-type asteroid hitting us; that, along with any full-scale nuclear war scenarios that might have happened during the Cold War, very well could cause a total collapse of global civilization as we know it.....but none of these are likely, and global warming isn't going to be enough to cause such by itself(despite the cries of our resident wannabe Cassandras), no matter which plausible scenario plays out.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)then we could figure out how to live sustainably on earth.
I personally doubt either great solution will happen. I think we'll run the earth ragged and die off, leaving cockroaches and ants to inherit the earth.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)variables. Will we finally have that overdue monster pandemic? Will unseen feedback loops escalate the melting of the glaciers and ice at the poles? Will weather patterns become so extreme that lack of rainfall makes feeding our population impossible? Will some nutcase open the nuclear genie's lamp again?
I do agree that he is right. If we don't send at least some of us off-planet then the race in general will go extinct. Most species do at one time or another.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)And btw I'm fine with the Chinese or Indians using their new found trillions on space colonization.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)I was under the impression we might not make it through the next century. I think if we can make it through the next 100 years, we'll be able to make it off the planet.
On another note, Stephen Hawking is 71? That's awesome. I remember hearing that he never thought he'd make it through his 30s.
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I plan on living forever.
So far, so good....
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)Yes I can, Yes I can, Yes I can -- maybe
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)montanto
(2,966 posts)Warpy
(111,254 posts)with the death of the human species. While we will eventually become extinct, I don't see it happening quite that quickly barring the type of planetary disaster that extinguishes all life.
Even if global warming becomes the runaway phenomenon some alarmists think it will, humanity will still likely cling to Arctic islands and Antarctica.
Now if he'd said we'd be extinct in a million years, the odds of that go up.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)It's the foundation of progress.
progressoid
(49,988 posts)Nobody wants to make sacrifices for future generations.
Yeah, if we continue like this, it's over for us.
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)We may need to shoot the planet in order to survive.
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)Okay, you gave me my first laugh-out-loud moment of the day.
Thanks.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)lovuian
(19,362 posts)marybourg
(12,627 posts)They can import some of those fantasticly assertive honey-making bees from Africa! What could go wrong?
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)Homo Sapiens exist for less than a million years, and we've only been civilized for 10,000.
In other words, a quick blip on this planet's multi billion year history.
But hey, it was a fun ride.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)in what Mr. Hawking says after he backpedaled on his black hole theory.
Initech
(100,068 posts)truegrit44
(332 posts)This man has more rational sense then every politician combined in this country.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)The heck with space. If people can't learn to take care of their shit on this planet, extinction is the honorable option.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Back in the 70's, reading Rachel Carson and Paul Tillich and Paul Erlich ( The Population Bomb), seeing what was already happening to the planet....
I was very aware there was this idea out there that "mankind"' could use the space program to find other habitable planets so we could spread to other places in the universe once we had trashed this blue globe sufficiently.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)There is no way humans can survive in space. Firing rockets into space is a threat to the atmosphere already, as are jet travel and automobile emissions. If humans want to survive, they must diminish population and get back into harmony with the natural system.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)And what's more nature is never in balance with itself.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)And this is definitely one of those times; sorry, doomsters, but barring a K/T event or gamma ray burst, or any other type of catastrophe that is truly cosmic in scale, we ain't going extinct anytime soon, and that's geologically speaking, mind you.
lebeckford
(1 post)Man has the inherent ability to make the same historical mistakes over and over again.
He is greedy, jealous, wasteful, and his own worst enemy, I we don't kill each other in a war, we will destroy the environment if a natural does not get rid of us first.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)"Alone among God's primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother's land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death."
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours.
Back in teh 70's, when The Population Bomb made such a furor, geometric progression of pop. numbers alone was an alarming fact.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I know, it's upsetting to consider, but it's quite possible.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's the smart thing to do, for long-term survival.
And we will.
But that's a long-ass way from "Stephen Hawking says wur doooomed!!!!"