Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:17 AM Apr 2013

Chelsea Clinton says she'd consider a run for public office

__________________

___ Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of former President Bill Clinton and
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said in an interview that aired Monday she would consider running for public office herself if the opportunity presented itself.

"Right now I’m grateful to live in a city, in a state and a country where I strongly support my mayor, my governor, my president, my senators and my representative,” Clinton told NBC News. "If at some point that weren’t true and I thought I could make a meaningful and measurably greater impact, I’d have to ask and answer that question."

. . . In September, Clinton hinted to Vogue that her mother's presidential campaign had changed her thinking on the possibility of forging her own political career.

"Before my mom’s campaign I would have said no," Clinton told the magazine. "Not because it was something I had thought a lot about but because people have been asking me that my whole life. And now I don't know."


read/watch clip: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/292301-chelsea-clinton-says-shed-consider-a-run-for-public-office


Rich Beauchesne

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chelsea Clinton says she'd consider a run for public office (Original Post) bigtree Apr 2013 OP
I think she's being lined up for that malaise Apr 2013 #1
Does she live in that district?? karynnj Apr 2013 #4
Go for it Chelsea!!!!! Little Star Apr 2013 #2
The House would be a good starting point. graham4anything Apr 2013 #3
Huh? Raine1967 Apr 2013 #5
OMG Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #6
After Jeb and Hillary run NightWatcher Apr 2013 #9
Oh I forgot about the Hispanic George Bush kid NightWatcher Apr 2013 #11
Glad to have Obama in there somewhere Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #18
You know, I really think it's a natural result of wildly unbalanced wealth distribution. Marr Apr 2013 #28
I think it stopped when it hit that other name back in '08...who was it? demwing Apr 2013 #29
Nepotism is nepotism. joeglow3 Apr 2013 #7
if she can get support and votes she will serve in office bigtree Apr 2013 #10
I am always surprised how these folks are immediately supported joeglow3 Apr 2013 #17
Name alone? No! with a pretty face? ...yes. That's enough to draw the support of the worshipers. n/t L0oniX Apr 2013 #32
Seems to me that denying a person for office simply due to blood LanternWaste Apr 2013 #21
Agreed. And she has done nothing to show me she is qualified joeglow3 Apr 2013 #24
Can she connect with an average person? LittleBlue Apr 2013 #8
that's usually not disqualifying for voters bigtree Apr 2013 #12
Pathetic whatchamacallit Apr 2013 #19
no, you're just challenged to find a candidate who can lead, inspire bigtree Apr 2013 #22
Yes. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #15
How could anyone whatchamacallit Apr 2013 #20
I am speaking from personal observations DURHAM D Apr 2013 #23
Added info - DURHAM D Apr 2013 #13
+ bigtree Apr 2013 #16
I'd like to know what her politics are first. Cleita Apr 2013 #14
If she thought like Eleanor, you'd know it by now. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #27
Wealth does not always translate into heartlessness. Look at the Kennedys. n/t Cleita Apr 2013 #30
I don't see the same commitment to public service from Chelsea as the Kennedys. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #34
She's like her Mom and Dad bigtree Apr 2013 #33
message auto removed L0oniX Apr 2013 #35
Yeah, really-- it's about time Wall Street had some representation in our government. Marr Apr 2013 #25
She needs to sock away few more million first, I imagine. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #26
barf pfffft L0oniX Apr 2013 #31
Damn, there are some Clinton hating people on this site. Beacool Apr 2013 #36
Yeah .. nepotism. AtomicKitten Apr 2013 #37
nepotism would mainly apply to an appointment bigtree Apr 2013 #39
It would be hard to argue name recognition isn't a huge advantage. AtomicKitten Apr 2013 #43
I'm not saying it's desirable in all races bigtree Apr 2013 #45
well, as they say in the biz AtomicKitten Apr 2013 #47
I'll give you odds she doesn't get the Ashley Judd treatment Glitterati Apr 2013 #38
I'd bet that a candidacy by her would attract all sorts of politics bigtree Apr 2013 #40
Not a fan of dynasties. Orsino Apr 2013 #41
The job at an arbitrage firm and marriage to a Goldman betterdemsonly Apr 2013 #42
I'd assume she wouldn't be running against herself bigtree Apr 2013 #46
maybe not for a house seat betterdemsonly Apr 2013 #48
Ahh, royalty. moondust Apr 2013 #44
I'd guess RudynJack Apr 2013 #50
no more clintons and no hedge fund spouses HiPointDem Apr 2013 #49
heh bigtree Apr 2013 #51
heh. indeed i do wish. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #52

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
4. Does she live in that district??
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:26 AM
Apr 2013

I seriously doubt it. She bought a condo off Madison Square Park on 26th street on the East side of Manhattan. Rangel's district is in Harlem on the West Side of Manhattan (about 150s)

I really do not see her trading a $10.5 million condo for something in Rangel's district.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. The House would be a good starting point.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:21 AM
Apr 2013

Senate is currently occupied

Then after Michelle's two terms,
VP for John Schlossberg in 2032 and 2036(or the other way around)
and President in 2040 and 2044

 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
6. OMG
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:29 AM
Apr 2013

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton... when will it all stop?

"Advocate for a more healthy, equitable, safe world and all things Clinton Foundation." https://www.facebook.com/chelseaclinton

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
28. You know, I really think it's a natural result of wildly unbalanced wealth distribution.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:37 PM
Apr 2013

The political influence congeals in a few small pools, as do the dollars.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
7. Nepotism is nepotism.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:31 AM
Apr 2013

What has she done that qualifies her? We have much better options than simply supporting another dynasty just because of whose crotch they popped out of.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
10. if she can get support and votes she will serve in office
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:38 AM
Apr 2013

. . . it's just that simple. Don't see the point in dissing her because of the family she's from. Like it or not, high profile candidates have a leg up in these races. She'll still have to prove herself, like any other candidate who doesn't happen to be named Clinton.

It's always interesting to me how these folks are dismissed by some without any mention at all of an alternative. That's what would determine her 'qualifications' to represent voters in public office.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
17. I am always surprised how these folks are immediately supported
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:50 AM
Apr 2013

EVERYONE can run. However, you HAVE to prove you are qualified. Sadly, too many people see the name and that is all the evidence they need.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
32. Name alone? No! with a pretty face? ...yes. That's enough to draw the support of the worshipers. n/t
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:45 PM
Apr 2013
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
21. Seems to me that denying a person for office simply due to blood
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:58 AM
Apr 2013

Seems to me that denying a person for office simply due to blood is just as absurd as supporting a person for office simply due to blood.





"What has she done that qualifies her?"
What specifically and objectively are the qualifications?

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
24. Agreed. And she has done nothing to show me she is qualified
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:31 PM
Apr 2013

Not to say she cannot, but when it comes to political office, my default position is you will not get my vote until you prove to me why you should have it. Thus, at this point, I don't give a shit that she "may want to run."

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
8. Can she connect with an average person?
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:34 AM
Apr 2013

She lives in $10.5m apartment with her investment banker husband.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
12. that's usually not disqualifying for voters
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:41 AM
Apr 2013

. . . I have personally been admiring the subjects she covers as a semi-journalist and the way she directly involves herself with her very important and interesting subjects. She has depth and substance.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
22. no, you're just challenged to find a candidate who can lead, inspire
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 12:00 PM
Apr 2013

. . . and get enough votes to win.

Putting that failure off on a candidate who you regard as inferior is just weirdness. Buck up and get to work promoting whoever you believe in. This anti-candidate stuff is non-productive and self-defeating.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
23. I am speaking from personal observations
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 12:03 PM
Apr 2013

of all three Clintons in public forums.

You seem to be speaking from ignorance of the subject.

Done

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
13. Added info -
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:43 AM
Apr 2013
http://www.parade.com/2340/lynnsherr/chelsea-clinton-leans-in/

Chelsea Leans In

Chelsea is now helping to run CGI U, an annual meeting for college students held through the Clinton Global Initiative, which her father launched in 2005 to develop innovative solutions to challenges around the world. The CGI U sessions, like the one taking place this weekend at Washington University in St. Louis, require attendees to make a Commitment to Action—a concrete plan to tackle a local or global problem. And the conference itself emphasizes practicalities and logistics, with speakers (from comedian Stephen Colbert to Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey) and workshops that explain how to get projects done.


What do you want people to know about CGI U?

CGI U is a testament to why we all should be optimistic about the future. We have more than 1,000 students coming from every state, from all across the world, who have made more than 600 commitments. It just gives me so many reasons to believe that our future will be brighter, healthier, more equitable than life has ever been.




Cleita

(75,480 posts)
14. I'd like to know what her politics are first.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:44 AM
Apr 2013

If she's a chip off the old mom and dad blocks, no thanks. On the other hand, I always thought she bore a resemblance to a young Eleanor Roosevelt. If she thinks like Eleanor, yeah I hope she goes into politics, sooner and not later.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
27. If she thought like Eleanor, you'd know it by now.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:37 PM
Apr 2013

She's the product of wealth and privilege, and she can't possibly relate to anyone outside the Upper East Side.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
34. I don't see the same commitment to public service from Chelsea as the Kennedys.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:47 PM
Apr 2013

JFK was LONG since a war hero when he was 33, and had been in Congress for years.

Ted Kennedy was a Senator by 33.

RFK was busting the rackets when he was 33.

Chelsea Clinton, by contrast, has gotten wealthy.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
33. She's like her Mom and Dad
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:46 PM
Apr 2013


tweeted by, SHOFCO ?@hope2shine
Think our girls at The Kibera School for Girls loved having @ChelseaClinton visit? This picture says it all. pic.twitter.com/VPkmQWSm


Chelsea Clinton 'On Assignment': Couple's love story leads to life-changing school in Kenyan slum

read story/watch: http://rockcenter.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/17/16548601-on-assignment-couples-love-story-leads-to-life-changing-school-in-kenyan-slum


 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
25. Yeah, really-- it's about time Wall Street had some representation in our government.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:33 PM
Apr 2013

That goes double for the wealthy children of the wealthy. Where's their voice, huh? Go, Chelsea!

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
36. Damn, there are some Clinton hating people on this site.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:27 PM
Apr 2013

Chelsea is a lovely person, smart, compassionate and down to earth. If she chooses to run for office, I'm sure that she will work hard to win votes. She won't expect to receive the job on a silver platter (as Caroline Kennedy did when she lobbied for Hillary's Senate seat). She has her mom's work ethic and her father's touch when dealing with people.

BTW, she looks a lot like a younger Hillary in that pic.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
39. nepotism would mainly apply to an appointment
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:47 PM
Apr 2013

. . . if voters want her to represent her in office they'll elect her.

That's not 'nepotism.' That's politics. Recognition+ appeal = votes. Hell, the Clinton name will likely still be as much of a lightning rod for rw hate as it is for her parents. Where's the advantage in that?

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
43. It would be hard to argue name recognition isn't a huge advantage.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:58 PM
Apr 2013

Stephen Colbert's sister is benefiting from it.

With name recognition comes money, the lifeblood of a political campaign.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
45. I'm not saying it's desirable in all races
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 03:03 PM
Apr 2013

. . . but I can think of quite a few critical elections where we'd kill for name recognition. It still comes down to her worth as a candidate, in voters' eyes. I'm not comfortable thinking of voters as gullible dupes. At some point, that vote is the candidate's ultimate qualification to represent the state or district they've campaigned in. Afterward, that vote is their ultimate accountability.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
40. I'd bet that a candidacy by her would attract all sorts of politics
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:48 PM
Apr 2013

. . . most of completely unrelated to her duties or potential in office.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
41. Not a fan of dynasties.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:55 PM
Apr 2013

I'd rather hear about her political ambitions when she has decided what they are, and preferably after hearing about some courageous stances she has taken.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
42. The job at an arbitrage firm and marriage to a Goldman
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 02:56 PM
Apr 2013

Sachs guy, would make it hard to disguise Clinton representation of Wallstreet.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
46. I'd assume she wouldn't be running against herself
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 03:07 PM
Apr 2013

. . . that's the rub of politics. She's in New York, right? Think the majority of those folks give a damn about working for Arbitrage or Sachs?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chelsea Clinton says she'...