General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerica Is Ruled by Billionaires, and They Are Coming After the Last Shreds of Our Democracy
http://www.alternet.org/america-ruled-billionaires-and-they-are-coming-after-last-shreds-our-democracyPlutocracy literally means rule by the rich. Rule can have various shades of meaning: those who exercise the authority of public office are wealthy; their wealth explains why they hold that office; they exercise that authority in the interests of the rich; they have the primary influence over who holds those offices and the actions they take. These aspects of plutocracy are not exclusive. Government of the rich and for the rich need not berun directly by the rich. Also, in some exceptional circumstances rich individuals who hold powerful positions may govern in the interests of the many, e.g. Franklin Roosevelt.
The United States today qualifies as a plutocracy on a number of grounds. Lets look at some striking bits of evidence. Gross income redistribution upwards in the hierarchy has been a feature of American society for the past decades. The familiar statistics tell us that nearly 80% of the national wealth generated since 1973 has gone to the upper 2%, 65% to the upper 1 per cent. Estimates as to the rise in real income for salaried workers over the past 40 years range from 20% to 28 %. In that period, real GDP has risen by 110% it has more than doubled.
To put it somewhat differently, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the top earning 1 percent of households gained about 8X more than those in the 60 percentile after federal taxes and income transfers over a period between 1979 and 2007; 10X those in lower percentiles. In short, the overwhelming fraction of all the wealth created over two generations has gone to those at the very top of the income pyramid. That pattern has been markedly accelerated since the financial crisis hit in 2008. Between 2000 and 2012, the real net worth of 90% of Americans has declined by 25%. Theoretically, there is the possibility that this change is due to structural economic features operating nationally and internationally. That argument wont wash, though, for three reasons. First, there is no reason to think that such a process has accelerated over the past five years during which disparities have widened at a faster rate. Second, other countries (many even more enmeshed in the world economy) have seen nothing like the drastic phenomenon occurring in the United States. Third, the readiness of the countrys political class to ignore what has been happening, and the absence of remedial action that could have been taken, in themselves are clear indicators of who shapes thinking and determines public policy. In addition, several significant governmental actions have been taken that directly favor the moneyed interests.
The latter include the dismantling of the apparatus to regulate financial activities specifically and big business generally. Runaway exploitation of the system by predatory banks was made possible by the Clinton reforms of the 1990s and the lax application of those rules that still prevailed. Attorney General Eric Holder just a few weeks ago went so far as to admit that the Department of Justices decisions on when to bring criminal charges against the biggest financial institutions will depend not on the question of legal violations alone but would include the hypothetical effects on economic stability of their prosecution. Earlier, Holder had extended blanket immunity to Bank of America and other mortgage lenders for their apparent criminality in forging, robo-signing, foreclosure documents on millions of home owners. In brief, equal protection and application of the law has been suspended. That is plutocracy.
malaise
(268,967 posts)Rec
midnight
(26,624 posts)economic stability of their prosecution... Well that kinda of explains why Scott Walker was not prosecuted he had a bank vault of money to make his prosecution an economic instability on a county he left in shambles....
PuraVidaDreamin
(4,100 posts)Has certainly earned a cushy job in plutocracyville at the end of 'his service'.
chuckstevens
(1,201 posts)This guy is the wimpiest, most feckless law enforcement official ever. The fact that he (as an african American) is totally unconcerned about the voter disenfranchisement issues going on particularly bothers me.
Jeff Murdoch
(168 posts)that there is a separate set of laws for the poor and the wealthy, but I think this is the first time that I have seen a senior government official actually admit to it.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)One law for the rest, and no law for the rich and powerful. That's a prescription for civil-war and social disintegration.
That's pretty much how all Empires collapse. On edit: That, and ugly hats.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)In civil court the Judges refuse to hear the defendants testimony, apparently believing in the honesty of corporate America. Also, laws covering consumer protections have been completely gutted so good luck there as well. Not sure how you weed the corruption out of the system either but corrupt it is.
librechik
(30,674 posts)I'm disgusted with Holder too, but while the Reps have controlled Congress they have altered the white collar crime laws. Now prosecutors have to prove criminal intent, which is ridiculously difficult to prove. We need to change the laws so that prosecutors have a chance to punish these fuckers, and to do that we need a strong majority in both houses.
Due to gerrymandering, we are unlikely to ever get it.
We are plain fucked. Holder is too.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)n/t
90-percent
(6,829 posts)-90% Jimmy
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)I appreciate all your posts, xchrom (and alternet even more as a result of your sharings), and share them elsewhere with those who -- amazingly -- refuse to see this truth.
Yet it makes me wonder this morning: Have you found anyone at DU who disagrees with this? We tend to disagree about nearly everything, but surely everywhere here agrees that herein lies the crux of our problems? Surely?
KG
(28,751 posts)OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)This seems to be the thing that we are powerless against.
Everyone gets distracted by the 'shiny' (chained CPI for example) when this is the ball that we need to keep our eye on (IMHO).
While everyone may agree that this is the problem; everyone won't agree on what steps need to be taken to fix the problem. Without a plan that everyone is working on, it is only going to get worse.
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)There are so many who DON'T agree that this is a problem, however. Granted, they're not likely to be on a site called "Democratic Underground."
But, yes, how to deal with it -- and recognizing that this lies at the heart of all the injustice and suffering -- is where we can't get on the same page.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)and often, seeing this as it is, we can become overwhelmed.
However, that's really the first milestone collectively. Get over being overwhelmed. Then think in a way that is a bit more creative and adaptive rather than yielding to self-imposed thresholds. Keep in mind that we have spent decades immersed an expert form of propaganda that has deeply influenced our thinking, reactions and capacity to act and react in a way that impacts the system around us.
I suggest that people first do their best to "get it" and investigate more about the system's nature and structure. Do that in a relaxed, leisurely way with a sense of discovery and for the sake of empowerment.
Then, rather than reaching out to higher levels of abstraction alone, (the big picture) consider how you can change your thinking, beliefs and behavior and what small steps you can take here and there. Consider how micro-changes can accrue when more and more people begin to move, in increments, against the momentum built around us. Support others who understand what's at stake and who want to change the direction we are going in and do commiserate about the natural sense of frustration that goes with this process.
Of course, with that kind of openness to a more emergent way of transforming things, we can start to see how the concepts of control are built-in to the system and sublimated to the point that we are supposed to feel powerless. We are very adaptable beings with extremely powerful bio-computers that have survived for thousands of years. That's quite a tool to have and use once you take note and break out of conceptual shells and the cages of beliefs designed skillfully by the "owners" to keep you in your place and complacent.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)Read some Marx. He and Engels are being proven more and more right every day.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)and Chomsky, and also look into the use of language, symbols, religion, propaganda, etc. All we are dealing with here is the use of abstracts in various ways to alter and motivate masses as well as inculcate a certain perspective that becomes transparent due to our habitual nature and the repetitive nature of the inputs.
There is a great series by the BBC called, The Century of the Self. That's a good primer on "public relations" and just how precisely consent is manufactured, our politics are co-opted, and our minds are influenced in a systematic way.
There are scores of good sources, some simple and more superficial, others more complex and in-depth. Perhaps more people will get inspired to educate themselves more and be less easily influenced by the masters of persuasion.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)ewagner
(18,964 posts)All the issues discussed have been floating around like individual pieces of knowledge...I never once gathered them all together under a single heading...Brenner ties them all together:
It's PLUTOCRACY
This infuriates me:
As to cleverness, the American plutocracy is actually a stupid plutocracy. First, it is overreaching. Far better to leave a few goodies on the table for the 99% and even a few crumbs for the 47% than to risk generating resentment and retaliation. Since the financial meltdown, financial and business interests have been unable to resist picking the pockets of the weak. Fishing out the small change in the wake of grand larceny is rubbing salt into wounds.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)Think, like, who exports 12 million barrels of oil per day, at a current price of $110 per barrel? So who makes.... and, therefore, WHO TAKES IN $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS A DAY? Per day!!!!!! THAT is who is controlling the government of the USA. Hand in hand with Exxon, and hand in hand with Rupert Murdock.
And 17 of the 9/11 hijackers were from that country, whose sheiks own 7% of Fox news, and who have financed a great many of Rupert Murdock's losses over the years, and who, by the way, are like God Fathers to junior bush. Jeb Bush, next up to bat. That is where the rules of the plutocracy are coming from.
Is it any wonder that Blackwater (a rose by any other name....I believe they've changed their name 3 or 4 times since "Blackwater", but the Amway son in law's Aryan nation mercenary company still lives) moved to Dubai? The oil exporting middle east countries, who believe in slavery, by the way, and forbid women to have a say in anything, are where our orders are really coming from.
As I said: Saudi Arabia, ALONE exports $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS A DAY worth of oil. That does not include UAE, Oman, etc, etc.
dmosh42
(2,217 posts)marmar
(77,078 posts)Don't you know
They're talkin' bout a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
Don't you know
They're talkin' about a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
While they're standing in the welfare lines
Crying at the doorsteps of those armies of salvation
Wasting time in the unemployment lines
Sitting around waiting for a promotion
Poor people gonna rise up
And get their share
Poor people gonna rise up
And take what's theirs
dotymed
(5,610 posts)(the MSM would be the best) often and on tee vee, then maybe the idiots who will not acknowledge this..will. IF that happens, MAYBE enough average Americans (it should be millions) would unite and take to the streets in protest to restore(?) Democracy in America.
IF Helen Thomas before she was removed (or an actual white house journalist still allowed in the whitehouse) were to daily ask "our" president or his spokesperson, if we are a plutocracy (as opposed to a democracy) and get an honest answer on tee vee ("yes, we are a plutocracy) Then "average Americans" may become incensed enough to ACT and demand a real democracy.
Of course, "there is a big "I" in front of that "F." Something has to change...
capitalism destroyed the USSR and it is doing the same to the USA....
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Sink like a stone here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022623997
I will be there today later today...but we are all talk and theory.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Proud to be your 5th rec there, Nadin. Thanks for all you do to bring important issues to light here at DU!
-app
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)The question was posed to Gandhi, would peaceful civil disobedience work in a totalitarian state? We never really got a convincing answer to that one.
P.S. - I gave you a 6th rec over at the other thread.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)Who are the real takers in our society?
The mom on welfare who's working three jobs just to be able to have barely enough to put a roof over her kids?
Or the billion dollar corporation that rakes in billions in profit every quarter and then gets another few billion from the government in the form of "subsidies"
They're bleeding us dry and getting away with it. It's fucking disgusting. And they have the balls to call themselves "job creators".
leveymg
(36,418 posts)before they do. Start with Walwart and AIG, too deserving global criminal organizations.
Initech
(100,068 posts)They already own the police, judges, prisons, Congress, and SCOTUS. They decide who gets locked up and who to go to war against. Really after you have all that do you really need protection?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)It's less clear who will be the GOP candidate, but (s)he'll be owned, too.
Initech
(100,068 posts)duffyduff
(3,251 posts)It isn't even just billionaires--it's gangsters, crooks, who want to plunder every last dime away from the people so they can have more.
They don't even believe in national sovereignty, either, for they will plunder every last dime from everywhere in the world.
They believe in slavery for the masses.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)K&R.
barryboomer
(3 posts)We are in deep doo doo. It's almost too late to turn it around.
I wrote songs about this stuff BUT the Mainstream Bizz won't touch it.
Check out MY Song and Video called
"LET'S TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY"
I'm up at barrydbutler channel on youtube...lots of all kinds of songs.
Barry David Butler
bdbutler@centurylink.net
moondust
(19,978 posts)Isn't the government's main job to help them in their grueling struggle?
(And why can't somebody in Texas rewrite the history books to reflect this ancient truth?)
alfredo
(60,071 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)nm
GiveMeFreedom
(976 posts)Great article. I for one, DO NOT welcome our new overlords.
The fight between the rich and poor has been going on for a long time. I do not think anything will change the control that the plutocracy has, short of an alien outer space intervention. Then we will find out we have been raised like cattle, ready for the intergalactic slave market. Hey, I am old and I like aliens, so I will not substitute reality for what the plutocracy tells me, there are outer space people (?). Peace.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)~Frederick Douglass
[center][/center]
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)bunch of god complex nut jobs telling folks how to live while they live comfy sheltered lifestyles.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)And they keep all of us separated (fighting each other) over bullshit like wedge issues.
TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)Plutocracy was always the goal.
I'm not sure what it's going to take to undo it now that it's firmly in place.
Sucks to be us, I guess.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Thank you for posting, xchrom!
PufPuf23
(8,771 posts)AG Holder is pathetic in protecting the innocent and powerless.