Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 07:16 AM Apr 2013

America Is Ruled by Billionaires, and They Are Coming After the Last Shreds of Our Democracy

http://www.alternet.org/america-ruled-billionaires-and-they-are-coming-after-last-shreds-our-democracy



Plutocracy literally means rule by the rich. “Rule” can have various shades of meaning: those who exercise the authority of public office are wealthy; their wealth explains why they hold that office; they exercise that authority in the interests of the rich; they have the primary influence over who holds those offices and the actions they take. These aspects of “plutocracy” are not exclusive. Government of the rich and for the rich need not berun directly by the rich. Also, in some exceptional circumstances rich individuals who hold powerful positions may govern in the interests of the many, e.g. Franklin Roosevelt.

The United States today qualifies as a plutocracy – on a number of grounds. Let’s look at some striking bits of evidence. Gross income redistribution upwards in the hierarchy has been a feature of American society for the past decades. The familiar statistics tell us that nearly 80% of the national wealth generated since 1973 has gone to the upper 2%, 65% to the upper 1 per cent. Estimates as to the rise in real income for salaried workers over the past 40 years range from 20% to 28 %. In that period, real GDP has risen by 110% – it has more than doubled.

To put it somewhat differently, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the top earning 1 percent of households gained about 8X more than those in the 60 percentile after federal taxes and income transfers over a period between 1979 and 2007; 10X those in lower percentiles. In short, the overwhelming fraction of all the wealth created over two generations has gone to those at the very top of the income pyramid. That pattern has been markedly accelerated since the financial crisis hit in 2008. Between 2000 and 2012, the real net worth of 90% of Americans has declined by 25%. Theoretically, there is the possibility that this change is due to structural economic features operating nationally and internationally. That argument won’t wash, though, for three reasons. First, there is no reason to think that such a process has accelerated over the past five years during which disparities have widened at a faster rate. Second, other countries (many even more enmeshed in the world economy) have seen nothing like the drastic phenomenon occurring in the United States. Third, the readiness of the country’s political class to ignore what has been happening, and the absence of remedial action that could have been taken, in themselves are clear indicators of who shapes thinking and determines public policy. In addition, several significant governmental actions have been taken that directly favor the moneyed interests.

The latter include the dismantling of the apparatus to regulate financial activities specifically and big business generally. Runaway exploitation of the system by predatory banks was made possible by the Clinton “reforms” of the 1990s and the lax application of those rules that still prevailed. Attorney General Eric Holder just a few weeks ago went so far as to admit that the Department of Justice’s decisions on when to bring criminal charges against the biggest financial institutions will depend not on the question of legal violations alone but would include the hypothetical effects on economic stability of their prosecution. Earlier, Holder had extended blanket immunity to Bank of America and other mortgage lenders for their apparent criminality in forging, robo-signing, foreclosure documents on millions of home owners. In brief, equal protection and application of the law has been suspended. That is plutocracy.
61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America Is Ruled by Billionaires, and They Are Coming After the Last Shreds of Our Democracy (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2013 OP
MUST READ malaise Apr 2013 #1
Criminals will get away with crime base not on their crimes, but on the prosecutors decision about midnight Apr 2013 #2
Eric Holder PuraVidaDreamin Apr 2013 #3
Worst AG EVER! chuckstevens Apr 2013 #12
Many people have known for a long time Jeff Murdoch Apr 2013 #18
Which is why they don't even bother to cover-up their crimes, anymore. leveymg Apr 2013 #26
It Goes Beyond Separate Law DallasNE Apr 2013 #30
to be fair librechik Apr 2013 #58
Billionaires won't be happy until they're trillionaires. And then the goalpost will move yet again. valerief Apr 2013 #4
DU Rec Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2013 #5
IT'S THE CORPORATIONS, STUPID! 90-percent Apr 2013 #6
"and now they're coming for your SOCIAL SECURITY!" 90-percent Apr 2013 #7
This seems so obvious to us. Are there any reading here who disagree, I wonder? OneGrassRoot Apr 2013 #8
they may not disagree with it, but they're okay with it. some, more than okay. KG Apr 2013 #13
Gotcha. Thanks. n/t OneGrassRoot Apr 2013 #14
It doesn't do any good to agree. Blanks Apr 2013 #21
I agree with that. OneGrassRoot Apr 2013 #22
We seem to be powerless Newest Reality Apr 2013 #40
In other words....... socialist_n_TN Apr 2013 #43
Yes! Newest Reality Apr 2013 #45
k&r nt steve2470 Apr 2013 #9
Recommend. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Apr 2013 #10
Long Read but well worth the time ewagner Apr 2013 #11
THAT is what makes me think about foreign involvement. Huge money. loudsue Apr 2013 #20
All with full endorsement of Repubs & Dems! dmosh42 Apr 2013 #15
Tracy Chapman, I hope you're right...... marmar Apr 2013 #16
... xchrom Apr 2013 #17
IF we could get the president or even a congressman to admit this dotymed Apr 2013 #19
And yet, actual people fighting back nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #23
Just sent that post to the Greatest page appal_jack Apr 2013 #24
Thanks. It just gets frustrating nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #25
Hunger strikes work in functional democracies. This isn't, anymore. leveymg Apr 2013 #27
must read. snagglepuss Apr 2013 #28
It's way past time to overthrow the plutocracy. Initech Apr 2013 #29
When I last checked, corporations didn't have Secret Service protection. Go for it leveymg Apr 2013 #31
There's no need for them to have Secret Service protection. Initech Apr 2013 #33
Walmart for President, '16. It will almost certainly be, either way. leveymg Apr 2013 #34
If SCOTUS says corporations people what's to stop them? Initech Apr 2013 #39
D.C. and many of the state legislatures are run by and for gangsters duffyduff Apr 2013 #32
Holy Crap... That's About As MUST READ As It Gets... HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2013 #35
Thanks for posting this. David Zephyr Apr 2013 #36
LETS TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY barryboomer Apr 2013 #37
Millionaires want to be billionaires. moondust Apr 2013 #38
As long a one poor person has a penny in his pocket, the rich will not give up. alfredo Apr 2013 #41
K&R woo me with science Apr 2013 #42
Time to kick this one..... socialist_n_TN Apr 2013 #44
K&R GiveMeFreedom Apr 2013 #46
Until Americans Decide That Enough Is Enough - Nothing Will Change cantbeserious Apr 2013 #47
kr HiPointDem Apr 2013 #48
Kick! octoberlib Apr 2013 #49
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #50
when will the silverspoon up the assholes have to sacrifice fascisthunter Apr 2013 #51
k&r and bookmarked n/t RainDog Apr 2013 #52
Yup Bigredhunk Apr 2013 #53
K&R! TeamPooka Apr 2013 #54
Government by and for the 1%. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #55
K&R, Thank You! smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #56
This is the end-game of Reaganism deutsey Apr 2013 #57
k&r...most imortant read. tex-wyo-dem Apr 2013 #59
Good article kr PufPuf23 Apr 2013 #60
kick woo me with science Apr 2013 #61

midnight

(26,624 posts)
2. Criminals will get away with crime base not on their crimes, but on the prosecutors decision about
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 07:30 AM
Apr 2013

economic stability of their prosecution... Well that kinda of explains why Scott Walker was not prosecuted he had a bank vault of money to make his prosecution an economic instability on a county he left in shambles....

 

chuckstevens

(1,201 posts)
12. Worst AG EVER!
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 08:46 AM
Apr 2013

This guy is the wimpiest, most feckless law enforcement official ever. The fact that he (as an african American) is totally unconcerned about the voter disenfranchisement issues going on particularly bothers me.

Jeff Murdoch

(168 posts)
18. Many people have known for a long time
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:35 AM
Apr 2013

that there is a separate set of laws for the poor and the wealthy, but I think this is the first time that I have seen a senior government official actually admit to it.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
26. Which is why they don't even bother to cover-up their crimes, anymore.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:43 AM
Apr 2013

One law for the rest, and no law for the rich and powerful. That's a prescription for civil-war and social disintegration.

That's pretty much how all Empires collapse. On edit: That, and ugly hats.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
30. It Goes Beyond Separate Law
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 12:59 PM
Apr 2013

In civil court the Judges refuse to hear the defendants testimony, apparently believing in the honesty of corporate America. Also, laws covering consumer protections have been completely gutted so good luck there as well. Not sure how you weed the corruption out of the system either but corrupt it is.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
58. to be fair
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 02:45 PM
Apr 2013

I'm disgusted with Holder too, but while the Reps have controlled Congress they have altered the white collar crime laws. Now prosecutors have to prove criminal intent, which is ridiculously difficult to prove. We need to change the laws so that prosecutors have a chance to punish these fuckers, and to do that we need a strong majority in both houses.

Due to gerrymandering, we are unlikely to ever get it.

We are plain fucked. Holder is too.

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
8. This seems so obvious to us. Are there any reading here who disagree, I wonder?
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 08:19 AM
Apr 2013

I appreciate all your posts, xchrom (and alternet even more as a result of your sharings), and share them elsewhere with those who -- amazingly -- refuse to see this truth.

Yet it makes me wonder this morning: Have you found anyone at DU who disagrees with this? We tend to disagree about nearly everything, but surely everywhere here agrees that herein lies the crux of our problems? Surely?



Blanks

(4,835 posts)
21. It doesn't do any good to agree.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:20 AM
Apr 2013

This seems to be the thing that we are powerless against.

Everyone gets distracted by the 'shiny' (chained CPI for example) when this is the ball that we need to keep our eye on (IMHO).

While everyone may agree that this is the problem; everyone won't agree on what steps need to be taken to fix the problem. Without a plan that everyone is working on, it is only going to get worse.

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
22. I agree with that.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:29 AM
Apr 2013

There are so many who DON'T agree that this is a problem, however. Granted, they're not likely to be on a site called "Democratic Underground."

But, yes, how to deal with it -- and recognizing that this lies at the heart of all the injustice and suffering -- is where we can't get on the same page.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
40. We seem to be powerless
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 07:41 PM
Apr 2013

and often, seeing this as it is, we can become overwhelmed.

However, that's really the first milestone collectively. Get over being overwhelmed. Then think in a way that is a bit more creative and adaptive rather than yielding to self-imposed thresholds. Keep in mind that we have spent decades immersed an expert form of propaganda that has deeply influenced our thinking, reactions and capacity to act and react in a way that impacts the system around us.

I suggest that people first do their best to "get it" and investigate more about the system's nature and structure. Do that in a relaxed, leisurely way with a sense of discovery and for the sake of empowerment.

Then, rather than reaching out to higher levels of abstraction alone, (the big picture) consider how you can change your thinking, beliefs and behavior and what small steps you can take here and there. Consider how micro-changes can accrue when more and more people begin to move, in increments, against the momentum built around us. Support others who understand what's at stake and who want to change the direction we are going in and do commiserate about the natural sense of frustration that goes with this process.

Of course, with that kind of openness to a more emergent way of transforming things, we can start to see how the concepts of control are built-in to the system and sublimated to the point that we are supposed to feel powerless. We are very adaptable beings with extremely powerful bio-computers that have survived for thousands of years. That's quite a tool to have and use once you take note and break out of conceptual shells and the cages of beliefs designed skillfully by the "owners" to keep you in your place and complacent.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
45. Yes!
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:03 PM
Apr 2013

and Chomsky, and also look into the use of language, symbols, religion, propaganda, etc. All we are dealing with here is the use of abstracts in various ways to alter and motivate masses as well as inculcate a certain perspective that becomes transparent due to our habitual nature and the repetitive nature of the inputs.

There is a great series by the BBC called, The Century of the Self. That's a good primer on "public relations" and just how precisely consent is manufactured, our politics are co-opted, and our minds are influenced in a systematic way.

There are scores of good sources, some simple and more superficial, others more complex and in-depth. Perhaps more people will get inspired to educate themselves more and be less easily influenced by the masters of persuasion.

ewagner

(18,964 posts)
11. Long Read but well worth the time
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 08:45 AM
Apr 2013

All the issues discussed have been floating around like individual pieces of knowledge...I never once gathered them all together under a single heading...Brenner ties them all together:

It's PLUTOCRACY

This infuriates me:

As to cleverness, the American plutocracy is actually a stupid plutocracy. First, it is overreaching. Far better to leave a few goodies on the table for the 99% and even a few crumbs for the 47% than to risk generating resentment and retaliation. Since the financial meltdown, financial and business interests have been unable to resist picking the pockets of the weak. Fishing out the small change in the wake of grand larceny is rubbing salt into wounds.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
20. THAT is what makes me think about foreign involvement. Huge money.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:17 AM
Apr 2013

Think, like, who exports 12 million barrels of oil per day, at a current price of $110 per barrel? So who makes.... and, therefore, WHO TAKES IN $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS A DAY? Per day!!!!!! THAT is who is controlling the government of the USA. Hand in hand with Exxon, and hand in hand with Rupert Murdock.

And 17 of the 9/11 hijackers were from that country, whose sheiks own 7% of Fox news, and who have financed a great many of Rupert Murdock's losses over the years, and who, by the way, are like God Fathers to junior bush. Jeb Bush, next up to bat. That is where the rules of the plutocracy are coming from.

Is it any wonder that Blackwater (a rose by any other name....I believe they've changed their name 3 or 4 times since "Blackwater", but the Amway son in law's Aryan nation mercenary company still lives) moved to Dubai? The oil exporting middle east countries, who believe in slavery, by the way, and forbid women to have a say in anything, are where our orders are really coming from.

As I said: Saudi Arabia, ALONE exports $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS A DAY worth of oil. That does not include UAE, Oman, etc, etc.

marmar

(77,078 posts)
16. Tracy Chapman, I hope you're right......
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:30 AM
Apr 2013

Don't you know
They're talkin' bout a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
Don't you know
They're talkin' about a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
While they're standing in the welfare lines
Crying at the doorsteps of those armies of salvation
Wasting time in the unemployment lines
Sitting around waiting for a promotion

Poor people gonna rise up
And get their share
Poor people gonna rise up
And take what's theirs




dotymed

(5,610 posts)
19. IF we could get the president or even a congressman to admit this
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:35 AM
Apr 2013

(the MSM would be the best) often and on tee vee, then maybe the idiots who will not acknowledge this..will. IF that happens, MAYBE enough average Americans (it should be millions) would unite and take to the streets in protest to restore(?) Democracy in America.
IF Helen Thomas before she was removed (or an actual white house journalist still allowed in the whitehouse) were to daily ask "our" president or his spokesperson, if we are a plutocracy (as opposed to a democracy) and get an honest answer on tee vee ("yes, we are a plutocracy) Then "average Americans" may become incensed enough to ACT and demand a real democracy.
Of course, "there is a big "I" in front of that "F." Something has to change...

capitalism destroyed the USSR and it is doing the same to the USA....

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
24. Just sent that post to the Greatest page
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:09 AM
Apr 2013

Proud to be your 5th rec there, Nadin. Thanks for all you do to bring important issues to light here at DU!

-app

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. Hunger strikes work in functional democracies. This isn't, anymore.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:52 AM
Apr 2013

The question was posed to Gandhi, would peaceful civil disobedience work in a totalitarian state? We never really got a convincing answer to that one.

P.S. - I gave you a 6th rec over at the other thread.

Initech

(100,068 posts)
29. It's way past time to overthrow the plutocracy.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 12:47 PM
Apr 2013

Who are the real takers in our society?

The mom on welfare who's working three jobs just to be able to have barely enough to put a roof over her kids?

Or the billion dollar corporation that rakes in billions in profit every quarter and then gets another few billion from the government in the form of "subsidies"

They're bleeding us dry and getting away with it. It's fucking disgusting. And they have the balls to call themselves "job creators".

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
31. When I last checked, corporations didn't have Secret Service protection. Go for it
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:20 PM
Apr 2013

before they do. Start with Walwart and AIG, too deserving global criminal organizations.

Initech

(100,068 posts)
33. There's no need for them to have Secret Service protection.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:31 PM
Apr 2013

They already own the police, judges, prisons, Congress, and SCOTUS. They decide who gets locked up and who to go to war against. Really after you have all that do you really need protection?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
34. Walmart for President, '16. It will almost certainly be, either way.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:37 PM
Apr 2013

It's less clear who will be the GOP candidate, but (s)he'll be owned, too.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
32. D.C. and many of the state legislatures are run by and for gangsters
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:26 PM
Apr 2013

It isn't even just billionaires--it's gangsters, crooks, who want to plunder every last dime away from the people so they can have more.

They don't even believe in national sovereignty, either, for they will plunder every last dime from everywhere in the world.

They believe in slavery for the masses.

 

barryboomer

(3 posts)
37. LETS TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 04:15 PM
Apr 2013

We are in deep doo doo. It's almost too late to turn it around.
I wrote songs about this stuff BUT the Mainstream Bizz won't touch it.
Check out MY Song and Video called
"LET'S TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY"
I'm up at barrydbutler channel on youtube...lots of all kinds of songs.




Barry David Butler
bdbutler@centurylink.net

moondust

(19,978 posts)
38. Millionaires want to be billionaires.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 04:46 PM
Apr 2013

Isn't the government's main job to help them in their grueling struggle?

(And why can't somebody in Texas rewrite the history books to reflect this ancient truth?)




GiveMeFreedom

(976 posts)
46. K&R
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:21 PM
Apr 2013

Great article. I for one, DO NOT welcome our new overlords.

The fight between the rich and poor has been going on for a long time. I do not think anything will change the control that the plutocracy has, short of an alien outer space intervention. Then we will find out we have been raised like cattle, ready for the intergalactic slave market. Hey, I am old and I like aliens, so I will not substitute reality for what the plutocracy tells me, there are outer space people (?). Peace.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
50. K&R
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:56 PM
Apr 2013
''Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.''

~Frederick Douglass


[center][/center]
 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
51. when will the silverspoon up the assholes have to sacrifice
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:37 PM
Apr 2013

bunch of god complex nut jobs telling folks how to live while they live comfy sheltered lifestyles.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
57. This is the end-game of Reaganism
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 08:10 AM
Apr 2013

Plutocracy was always the goal.

I'm not sure what it's going to take to undo it now that it's firmly in place.

Sucks to be us, I guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America Is Ruled by Billi...