Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDraw the Line
Your boss isn't allowed to tell you where to go on vacation. Your boss has absolutely no say in how you spend your salary.So why should your boss get to decide whether you can use your health insurance to get copay-free birth control?
The answer is simple: They shouldn't.
Speak out now to stop employers from denying women access to copay-free contraception. The deadline for comments is April 8, 2013.
On February 1, 2013, the Obama Administration announced that it will stand firm in its commitment to copay-free birth control under the Affordable Care Act.
This announcement angered the smallbut incredibly vocal and well-fundedopposition that wants to deny women this critical benefit based on an employer's "religious objections." These groups are flooding the Department of Health and Human Services with reasons why women don't deserve affordable reproductive health care. But we know they're wrongand we're speaking out.
Stand up for women's health. Send your comments to HHS before April 8, 2013.
The Center believes that access to contraception is a human right that cannot be subject to an employer's religious opinions. Allowing employers to deny women coverage of copay-free contraception would directly harm employees' health, burden them financially, and infringe on their rights.
This issue is too important to remain silent. Take action today.
Thanks, as always, for all you do,
Nancy Northup
President & CEO
From my email:
Please go to the link to Sign!
http://www.drawtheline.org/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1209 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Draw the Line (Original Post)
sheshe2
Apr 2013
OP
Across my teaching career, my contracts gave my bosses a say in how I spent my money
HereSince1628
Apr 2013
#6
silverweb
(16,402 posts)1. Signed and shared!
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)2. Thanks, silverweb! n/t
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)3. Signed. Thanks.n/t
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)4. Thank you, LadyHawk.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)5. K&R and signed.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)6. Across my teaching career, my contracts gave my bosses a say in how I spent my money
and how I spent my time away from work, because my contracts could be terminated for 'moral terpitude'.
Now, moral terpitude, is a weasley term, depending upon those who invent claims against it.
I know a physicist who taught at a rather fundamental evangelical college in Wheaton Illninois who was fired when someone squealed that he had served wine at a dinner at home.
I know of a microbiologist/geneticist who was terminated because he visited a strip club while away from school at a convention.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)7. Now that's just sad!
And un frigging believable!
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)8. People often hold teacher to higher moral standards than clergy
A contract at one school said I had to be "friendly" and didn't specify with whom.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)9. That statement alone makes me nervous!
A contract at one school said I had to be "friendly" and didn't specify with whom.
Thanks, HereSince.